Mone Lapao’o works with the Waste Management & Pollution Control Division within Tonga’s Department of Environment He is leading work to reduce plastic waste impacting the coasts and waters of Tonga through education and all-hands-on-deck efforts to clean up trash In Tonga we are very proud of our oceans – we are after all an Island nation – and the ocean and our waters hold great significance for us This is the biggest reason why we need to look after our oceans It starts with keeping them clean and healthy The main sources of waste here are littering and illegal dumping Any plastic waste that enters our waterways ultimately flows to the ocean where it breaks down and enters the food chain as microplastic are consumed by marine life Recent reports have exposed the threat of plastic waste from domestic and international sources it’s clear that the fight begins at home – tackling the sources of plastic pollution within our own borders When did you first get involved in trying to address this issue / make a change I first got involved in waste management in 2011 as a member of the team leading a community-level program supported through the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) I joined the Department of Environment under a similar program but one with a broader national reach What impact do you hope your work/project can achieve I hope we can start by eliminating the sources of plastic waste within our borders Most of the waste we find in Tonga’s waterways and oceans is shown to come from Tonga itself The majority of this waste is junk and takeaway food packaging We are working to better enforce the Waste Management Act, by restricting dumping and ensuring no plastic is incinerated. We are also engaged in direct clean-up exercises to remove physical waste from waterways and coastal areas, like the Beat Pollution Trash Challenge I know that through a greater focus on awareness – why we need to stem the flow of plastic waste – we can solve this critical issue Healthy oceans are critical for the health and beauty of Tonga – this country of which I am very proud This is probably my biggest motivator for the work I am undertaking It also motivates me to plan ahead for the future or consider areas that require further attention like waste in the shipping sector: where is it going now and how should we manage it when ships dock in our waters People need to be responsible for their own actions including around littering and illegal dumping We are trying to help increase this awareness and sense of responsibility through education – there’s much more to be done If there’s one change you’d like to see every person in Tonga make to reduce plastic pollution STAY CURRENT WITH OUR LATEST DATA & INSIGHTS Metrics details A Correction to this article was published on 08 August 2024 This article has been updated Population aging is forcing the transformation of health care Long-term care in the home is complex and involves complex communication with primary care services the expansion of digital health has the potential to improve access to home-based primary care; however the use of technologies can increase inequalities in access to health for an important part of the population The aim of this study was to identify and map the uses and types of digital health interventions and their impacts on the quality of home-based primary care for older adults This is a broad and systematized scoping review with rigorous synthesis of knowledge directed by the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) The quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and the qualitative data were analyzed through basic qualitative content analysis interpersonal and technical dimensions of care The preliminary results were subjected to consultation with stakeholders to identify strengths and limitations as well as potential forms of socialization The mapping showed the distribution of publications in 18 countries and in the Sub-Saharan Africa region Older adults have benefited from the use of different digital health strategies; however this review also addresses limitations and challenges such as the need for digital literacy and technological infrastructure In addition to the impacts of technologies on the quality of health care The review gathered priority themes for the equitable implementation of digital health such as access to home caregivers and digital tools importance of digital literacy and involvement of patients and their caregivers in health decisions and design of technologies which must be prioritized to overcome limitations and challenges shorter hospitalization time and autonomy of older adults results can be measured by the 7 pillars of quality: effectiveness (ensuring that digital technologies produce desirable results) These include: effectiveness (ensuring that digital care achieves the same results in day-to-day practice); efficiency (use of available resources; optimization with the search for improvements in processes and results); acceptability (adaptation and acceptance of technologies by older people and health professionals); legitimacy of the ethical and legal compliance of digital care; and equity (equal access and quality in digital health services for all older people regardless of their individual characteristics) This scoping study is relevant for its originality in mapping the use and types of digital health interventions and evaluating their impact on the quality of health care for the elderly from Donabedian's theoretical perspective adapting his framework to evaluate the quality of technology-mediated health care It has theoretical robustness as it is based on a theory of quality assessment that is widely recognized in the field and one of the differential aspects of the methodology is the inclusion of stakeholder consultation as a way of consulting the applicability of the review's results so that they can be accessible to other researchers Seeking to contribute to improving the quality of primary health care this review aim to identify and map the uses and types of digital health interventions and their impacts on the quality of home-based primary care for older adults The following research questions were developed according to the PCC (population—older adults concept—digital health interventions and context- home-based primary care): Which countries use digital health interventions in home-based primary care for older adults What kind of digital health interventions (methods human resources and technology) are used in home-based primary care for older adults What is the impact of digital health interventions on the quality of home-based primary care for older people We chose to include publications that addressed the use of digital health interventions in home-based primary care for older adults and responded to the PCC of the research; included primary studies theoretical communications; and included gray literature No time or language filters will be applied to the searches as the search strategies have been designed to reach a wide range of publications Duplicate publications (Duplicate publications are those retrieved more than 1 × during the literature search process) and studies with patients under 60 years of age were included as exclusion criteria so studies that included patients under the age of 60 were excluded to avoid biasing the results considering that the health needs and challenges faced by older people are different Studies that included caregivers and health professionals under the age of 60 were not excluded A search strategy adapted to the different bases was used; it was refined by a librarian to improve sensitivity and assertiveness based on the objective of the study and the standard search strategy is available in Additional file 1 The study selection process was guided by the steps proposed in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) The identified studies were grouped according to the Endnote® reference manager Rayyan software® was used to assist in blinding the reviewers who independently performed the double-blind selection conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer The studies selected by title and abstract were moved to the full-text reading phase After reading the full texts and validating the final sample 4 researchers evaluated the compatibility and relevance of the evidence with the objective of the review The evidence was extracted and organized in an Excel® spreadsheet and the data were extracted according to the extraction form available in Additional file 2 (for which the form was updated) A summary of the results was preliminarily shared with stakeholders who were considered to be a mechanism for knowledge transfer and exchange as well as for developing effective dissemination strategies and ideas for future studies A summary of the stakeholder comments is available after the discussion the study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the authors' institute under CAEE 54853921.0.0000.5292 Selection of sources of evidence—PRISMA-ScR Distribution of the number of publications according to year Distribution of the number of publications according to country The mapping of countries reveals nations with different levels of socioeconomic development The group of countries considered socioeconomically developed is responsible for the largest number of studies mapped With the intention of knowing the main health conditions of people who use digital health strategies, Fig. 4 presents a word cloud. Health conditions addressed by digital means in the HBPC for older people In the case of positive impacts, presented in Table 1 the organizational dimension was reported in two subcategories The first subcategory addresses the contributions of technologies to facilitating access and accessibility to health care The second subcategory includes the results focused on the use of digital health technologies The Relational Dimension and Interpersonal dimension portray the use of technologies to improve communication between patients The technical dimension was the most expressive among the positive impacts because 57.97% of the analyzed documents reported some positive outcomes from the use of digital health services covering health care directed at older adults There are challenges and limitations when using digital health interventions for the health care of older adults. Table 2 summarizes how this issue relates to the quality of care The organizational dimension is organized into three sub-dimensions access to technologies and to technological infrastructure challenges related to the management of people and teams and challenges linked to economic impacts limitations related to the communication of people mediated by technologies challenges in using digital tools and how this communication affects the relationship between older adults and caregivers are discussed limitations related to clinical outcomes were found such as patients reporting no significant improvement in quality of life The evidence also indicates that digital technologies do not yet have an impact on health care or quality of life Strategies for improving the quality of care mediated by digital health The results presented in this study provide a comprehensive overview of the use of digital health interventions in primary home care for older adults Sweden and Canada have published the most studies on the subject A wide range of digital interventions were used in home-based primary care for the elderly health monitoring and assistive technologies The main health conditions addressed were chronic non-communicable diseases and the digital interventions showed significant improvements in the quality of life and mental health of the elderly such as limited access to technologies and communication problems Several points for discussion emerge from these results with emphasis on the evaluation of the impacts of digital health on the quality of HBPC for older adults digital technologies in health can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals of Health and Well-Being helping individuals collaborate to achieve universal health coverage and expand access to health services digital health has impacts on the relational dimension with regard to the feasibility of communication proximity and improvement of human interactions this approach can provide updated information in real time and optimize care social inequities are responsible for dividing those who can use technologies to improve health care from those who could have their access to health improved by technologies but do not have access to adequate infrastructure it is early to conclude that digital interventions can interfere with the cost-effectiveness of health care The findings of this study will assist public health policymakers in their decision-making presenting the difficulties to be faced and the main benefits of digital health Mapping the digital tools used in the HBPC of older people contributes to choosing the most appropriate digital interventions for each patient When making the choice to include digital tools in the home care of older people caregivers and patients should be aware of the strengths and limitations of these strategies as the implementation of digital health without proper monitoring of the quality of care can increase inequities Technology developers must pay attention to the results presented when developing digital interventions that meet the health needs of older people intuitive and improve their quality of life seeking to overcome possible difficulties and limitations so that the use of technologies does not become a burden in the HBPC of older people Further research should be carried out to understand the local reality in different countries motivators for professionals to use digital health and the satisfaction of older people and their caregivers with health technologies In order to assess the maturity and quality of digital health in HBPC especially in emerging countries and universal health systems The strong point is that this was the first scoping review with methodological rigor and broad analysis of the evidence to identify the types of digital intervention used in home-based health care for older people in the context of primary care and to assess the quality of care at the same time The results allow us to visualize the regions that published their results in the literature to determine the most commonly used tools and the main health conditions of the patients in the context of interest in the study we can mention the lack of reach of countries that use digital health tools in the home environment for older people but did not publicize their results This study included the place of interest in the family home; this cut excluded publications that included the place of research community residences hospitals and long-stay institutions for older adults A new study focusing on these modalities of residence should be considered Twenty potential stakeholders were invited via e-mail; among them eight had confirmed participation and answered questions of interest via Google forms The stakeholder consultation strengthened the discussion pointing out the most relevant results and weaknesses in the presentation of these results that were corrected at the preparation stage of the article Regarding strategies for the dissemination and sharing of results stakeholders suggested scientific socialization in national/international journals The technical sharing of the results (science translation) among managers with decision-making power was suggested to enable the implementation monitoring and evaluation of interventions in digital health The results of this consultation indicate that the authors should be concerned with promoting the participation of professionals managers and other stakeholders in the formulation and implementation of guidelines and policies for the implementation of digital health to reduce health inequities articulating with figures of political influence and social representatives is relevant Stakeholders encouraged dissemination at health events in the form of banners and sharing on social networks and official websites of the institutions to which the researchers are linked It was suggested that the theme of this research be expanded in the training spaces of future health professionals The present scoping review mapped and identified the uses and types of digital health interventions and their impacts on the quality of primary home care for older adults The findings presented here will be useful for researchers managers and users to understand the current landscape and the actions needed to improve technology-mediated health care the results point to the relevance of the use of digital health and the types of technologies most commonly used in clinical situations that can be mediated by digital health Digital health is playing an increasingly important role in improving the quality of home-based health care for older people through the use of a multidisciplinary approach it is crucial to address the challenges identified and ensure that interventions are tailored to the individual needs of patients as well as to investment in digital literacy age-appropriate technologies and policies for equitable deployment of digital health This approach can help promote healthy aging and provide high-quality care to older adults worldwide it is possible to establish priority themes that should be addressed and researched such as the challenges for equitable implementation of digital health in emerging countries the sustainability of universal health systems and home care policies for assessing the quality and safety of digital health technologies used in the HBPC new business models of digital services and the financing of digital health in the context of PHC Advances in the health area must be distributed according to the concept of equity Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05280-y Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Schenker M, Costa DHD. Avanços e desafios da atenção à saúde da população idosa com doenças crônicas na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Ciênc saúde col. 2019;24(4):1369–80. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018244.01222019 Elbaz S, Cinalioglu K, Sekhon K, Gruber J, Rigas C, Bodenstein K, et al. A systematic review of telemedicine for older adults with dementia during COVID-19: an alternative to in-person health services? Front Neurol. 2021;12:761965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.761965 Steindal SA, Nes AAG, Godskesen TE, Holmen H, Winger A, Österlind J, et al. Advantages and Challenges of Using Telehealth for Home-Based Palliative Care: Systematic Mixed Studies Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43684-e. https://doi.org/10.2196/43684 Lyth J, Lind L, Persson HL, Wiréhn AB. Can a telemonitoring system lead to decreased hospitalization in elderly patients? J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19858178 Maia JS, Marin H de F. Aplicativos móveis para as sociedades menos favorecidas. Acta paul enferm. 2021;34:eAPE002214. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2021AR02214 Khanuja K, Joki J, Bachmann G, Cuccurullo S. Gait and balance in the aging population: Fall prevention using innovation and technology. Maturitas. 2018;110:51–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.01.021 Gaspar AGM, Lapão LV. A digital health service for elderly people with balance disorders and risk of falling: a design science approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031855 Koo BM, Vizer LM. Examining mobile technologies to support older adults with dementia through the lens of personhood and human needs: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(11):e15122. https://doi.org/10.2196/15122 Rathbone AL, Prescott J. The use of mobile apps and SMS messaging as physical and mental health interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8):e295. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7740 Lloyd-Sherlock P, Ebrahim S, Geffen L, McKee M. Bearing the brunt of covid-19: older people in low and middle income countries. BMJ. 2020;13:m1052. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1052 Ivan L, Cutler SJ. Ageism and technology: the role of internalized stereotypes. Univ Tor Q. 2021;90(2):127–39. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.90.2.05 Mannheim I, Wouters EJM, Köttl H, van Boekel LC, Brankaert R, van Zaalen Y. Ageism in the discourse and practice of designing digital technology for older persons: a scoping review. Gerontologist. 2023;63(7):1188–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac144 Greenhalgh T, Koh GCH, Car J. Covid-19: a remote assessment in primary care. BMJ. 2020;368:m1182. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1182 Fagherazzi G, Goetzinger C, Rashid MA, Aguayo GA, Huiart L. Digital health strategies to fight COVID-19 worldwide: challenges, recommendations, and a call for papers. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(6)e19284. https://doi.org/10.2196/19284 Celuppi IC, Lima G dos S, Rossi E, Wazlawick RS, Dalmarco EM. Uma análise sobre o desenvolvimento de tecnologias digitais em saúde para o enfrentamento da COVID-19 no Brasil e no mundo. Cad Saúde Pública. 2021;37(3):e00243220. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00243220 Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. O Papel das Tecnologias Digitais no Envelhecimento e na Saúde. Washington, DC: OPAS; 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37774/9789275726907 Lapão LV, Peyroteo M, Maia M, Seixas J, Gregório J, Mira da Silva M, et al. Implementation of digital monitoring services during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with chronic diseases: design science approach. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(8):e24181. https://doi.org/10.2196/24181 Procópio LCR, Seixas CT, Avellar RS, Silva KLd, Santos MLdMd. A Atenção Domiciliar no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde: desafios e potencialidades. Saúde Debate. 2019;43(121):592–604. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201912123 Paulo MS, Loney T, Lapão LV. The primary health care in the emirate of Abu Dhabi: are they aligned with the chronic care model elements? BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2691-4 Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-Dewan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;6(11):e1196–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3 An introduction to quality assurance in health care Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol 8(1):19–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2021;19(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021;74(9):790–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2023;21(3):520–32. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123 Silva ÍdS, Silva CRDV, Lopes RH, Araújo AJd, Figueirêdo RCd, Bay OdG, et al. Digital health interventions and quality of home-based primary care for older adults: A scoping review protocol. Front in Public Health. 2023;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022587 Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x O'Brien N, Ayisi-Boateng N, Lounsbury O, Leis M, Ghafur S, Darzi A, et al. Digital health in primary health care: Current use and future opportunities in the Sub-Saharan African region. London: Imperial College London; 2023. https://doi.org/10.25561/104371 Arnaert A, Klooster J, Chow V. Attitudes towards videotelephones: An exploratory study of older adults with depression. J Gerontological Nursing. 2007;33(9):5–13. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20070901-02 The effectiveness of a care coordination home telehealth program for veterans with diabetes mellitus: A 2-year follow-up Bendixen RM, Levy CE, Olive ES, Kobb RF, Mann WC. Cost effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program to support chronically ill and disabled elders in their homes. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(1):31–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2008.0046 Reducing the distance in distance-caregiving by technology innovation Cardozo L, Steinberg J. Telemedicine for recently discharged older patients. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0058 The association of home-telehealth use and care coordination with improvement of functional and cognitive functioning in frail elderly men Correa G, Domènech M. Care networking: A study of technical mediations in a home telecare service. Int J Env Res and Public Health. 2013;10(7):3072–88. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10073072 Finch M, Griffin K, Pacala JT. Reduced healthcare use and apparent savings with passive home monitoring technology: a pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(6):1301–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14892 Gellis ZD, Kenaley B, McGinty J, Bardelli E, Davitt J, Ten Have T. Outcomes of a telehealth intervention for homebound older adults with heart or chronic respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontologist. 2012;52(4):541–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr134 Giraldo-Rodriguez L, Torres-Castro S, Martinez-Ramirez D, Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Perez-Cuevas R. Tele-care and tele-alarms for the elderly: preliminary experiences in Mexico. Rev Saud Public. 2013;47(4):711–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004574 Thomas S, Terry R, Jennifer L, Catherine FR, Suzanne B, Patricia D, et al. Feasibility and impact of telemonitor-based depression care management for geriatric homecare patients. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(8):620–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0011 Wray LO, Shulan MD, Toseland RW, Freeman KE, Vásquez BE, Gao J. The effect of telephone support groups on costs of care for veterans with dementia. Gerontologist. 2010;50(5):623–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq040 Roberts A, Philip L, Currie M, Mort A. Striking a balance between in-person care and the use of eHealth to support the older rural population with chronic pain. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015;10. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v10.27536 Schofield RS, Kline SE, Schmalfuss CM, Carver HM, Aranda JM, Pauly DF, et al. Early outcomes of a care coordination-enhanced telehome care program for elderly veterans with chronic heart failure. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(1):20–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2005.11.20 Takahashi PY, Hanson GJ, Pecina JL, Stroebel RJ, Chaudhry R, Shah ND, et al. A randomized controlled trial of telemonitoring in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: The Tele-ERA study. BMC Health Services Res. 2010;10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-255 Algilani S, Langius-Eklöf A, Kihlgren A, Blomberg K. An interactive ICT platform for early assessment and management of patient-reported concerns among older adults living in ordinary housing - development and feasibility. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(11–12):1575–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13468 Chung J, Thompson HJ, Joe J, Hall A, Demiris G. Examining Korean and Korean American older adults’ perceived acceptability of home-based monitoring technologies in the context of culture. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017;42(1):61–76. https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2016.1160244 Elers P, Hunter I, Whiddett D, Lockhart C, Guesgen H, Singh A. User requirements for technology to assist aging in place: qualitative study of older people and their informal support networks. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(6):e10741. https://doi.org/10.2196/10741 Ewers A, Gnass I. painApp-mobile pain monitoring in the home care setting. Schmerz. 2018;32(5):348–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-018-0313-7 Wilkinson JR, Spindler M, Wood SM, Marcus SC, Weintraub D, Morley JF, et al. High patient satisfaction with telehealth in Parkinson disease A randomized controlled study. Neurol Clin Pract. 2016;6(3):241–51. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000252 Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.036 Göransson C, Eriksson I, Ziegert K, Wengström Y, Langius-Eklöf A, Brovall M, et al. Testing an app for reporting health concerns-Experiences from older people and home care nurses. Int J Older People Nurs. 2018;13(2):e12181. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12181 Jia H, Chuang HC, Wu SS, Wang X, Chumbler NR. Long-term effect of home telehealth services on preventable hospitalization use. J Rehab Res Devel. 2009;46(5):557–65. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2008.09.0133 Kao DP, Lindenfeld J, Macaulay D, Birnbaum HG, Jarvis JL, Desai US, et al. Impact of a telehealth and care management program on all-cause mortality and healthcare utilization in patients with heart failure. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(1):2–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0007 Kobb R, Hoffman N, Lodge R, Kline S. Enhancing elder chronic care through technology and care coordination: Report from a pilot. Telemed J E Health. 2003;9(2):189–95. https://doi.org/10.1089/153056203766437525 Lamothe L, Fortin JP, Labbe F, Gagnon MP, Messikh D. Impacts of telehomecare on patients, providers, and organizations. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(3):363–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.12.363 Makai P, Perry M, Robben SHM, Schers HJ, Heinen MM, Olde Rikkert MGM, et al. Evaluation of an eHealth intervention in chronic care for frail older people: why adherence is the first target. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e156-e. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3057 Pecina JL, Vickers KS, Finnie DM, Hathaway JC, Hanson GJ, Takahashi PY. Telemonitoring increases patient awareness of health and prompts health-related action: initial evaluation of the TELE-ERA study. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(6):461–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2010.0213 Peel NM, Russell TG, Gray LC. Feasibility of using an in-home video conferencing system ingeriatric rehabilitation. J Rehab Med. 2011;43(4):364–6. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0675 Upatising B, Hanson GJ, Kim YL, Cha SS, Yih Y, Takahashi PY. Effects of home telemonitoring on transitions between frailty states and death for older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Intern J Gen Med. 2013;6:145–51. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S40576 van Hoof J, Kort HSM, Rutten PGS, Duijnstee MSH. Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(5):310–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.010 Vimarlund V, Olve Nils-Goran NG, Scandurra I, Koch S. Organizational effects of information and communication technology (ICT) in elderly homecare: A case study. Health Informatics J. 2008;14(3):195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X08092830 Vincent C, Reinharz D, Deaudelin I, Garceau M, Talbot LR. Public telesurveillance service for frail elderly living at home, outcomes and cost evolution: A quasi experimental design with two follow-ups. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-41 Dang S, Ruiz DI, Klepac L, Morse S, Becker P, Levy CR, et al. Key characteristics for successful adoption and implementation of home telehealth technology in veterans affairs home-based primary care: an exploratory study. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(4):309–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0009 Telessaúde com Idosos em Tempos de Pandemia: Experiência de uma Residência Multiprofissional Bjørkquist C, Forss M, Samuelsen F. Collaborative challenges in the use of telecare. Scand J Car Sci. 2019;33(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12605 Christiansen L, Lindberg C, Berglund JS, Anderberg P, Skar L. Using Mobile Health and the Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life: Perceptions of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment. Int J Res Public Health. 2020;17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082650 Göransson C, Wengström Y, Ziegert K, Langius-Eklöf A, Blomberg K. Self-care ability and sense of security among older persons when using an app as a tool for support. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020;34(3):772–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12782 Dang S, Olsan T, Karuza J, Cai X, Gao S, Intrator O, et al. Telehealth in home-based primary care: factors and challenges associated with integration into veteran care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(9):1928–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16045 Glomsås HS, Knutsen IR, Fossum M, Halvorsen K. “They just came with the medication dispenser’- a qualitative study of elderly service users” involvement and welfare technology in public home care services. BMC health serv res. 2021;21(1):245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06243-4 Gomes LA, Gregório MJ, Iakovleva TA, De Sousa RD, Bessant J, Oliveira P, et al. A home-based ehealth intervention for an older adult population with food insecurity: Feasibility and acceptability study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(8). https://doi.org/10.2196/26871 Guzman-Clark J, Yefimova M, Farmer MM, Wakefield BJ, Viernes B, Lee ML, et al. Home telehealth technologies for heart failure: An examination of adherence among veterans. J Gerontological Nursing. 2020;46(7):26–34. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20200605-05 Hawley CE, Genovese N, Owsiany MT, Triantafylidis LK, Moo LR, Linsky AM, et al. Rapid integration of home telehealth visits amidst COVID-19: What do older adults need to succeed? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(11):2431–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16845 Hunter I, Elers P, Lockhart C, Guesgen H, Singh A, Whiddett D. Issues associated with the management and governance of sensor data and information to assist aging in place: Focus group study with health care professionals. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(12). https://doi.org/10.2196/24157 Iyer SS, Ngo V, Humber MB, Chen P, Pallaki M, Dolinar T, et al. Caregiver experience of tele-dementia care for older veterans. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38(13):2960–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08188-2 Jakobsson E, Nygård L, Kottorp A, Malinowsky C. Experiences from using eHealth in contact with health care among older adults with cognitive impairment. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33(2):380–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12634 Kalicki AV, Moody KA, Franzosa E, Gliatto PM, Ornstein KA. Barriers to telehealth access among homebound older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(9):2404–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17163 Karlsen C, Moe CE, Haraldstad K, Thygesen E. Caring by telecare? A hermeneutic study of experiences among older adults and their family caregivers. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(7–8):1300–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14744 Comparative study of home care digitalization for elderly people in Brazil and Finland Lai FHY, Yan EWH, Yu KKY, Tsui WS, Chan DTH, Yee BK. The protective impact of telemedicine on persons with dementia and their caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;28(11):1175–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2020.07.019 McDonald AP, Rizzotti R, Rivera JM, D’Arcy RCN, Park G, Song X. Toward improved homecare of frail older adults: A focus group study synthesizing patient and caregiver perspectives. Aging Med (Milton). 2021;4(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12144 Read Paul L, Salmon C, Sinnarajah A, Spice R. Web-based videoconferencing for rural palliative care consultation with elderly patients at home. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(9):3321–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4580-8 Rodrigues MA, Santana RF, Hercules ABS, Bela JC, Rodrigues JN. Telenursing in the home care service in COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Online Braz J Nurs. 2021;20:1–15. https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20216462 Scheibe M, Lang C, Druschke D, Arnold K, Luntz E, Schmitt J, et al. Independent use of a home-based telemonitoring app by older patients with multimorbidity and mild cognitive impairment: qualitative study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021;8(3):e27156. https://doi.org/10.2196/27156 Van Doorn-van Atten MN, Haveman-Nies A, Heery D, de Vries JH, de Groot LC. Feasibility and effectiveness of nutritional telemonitoring for home care clients: a pilot study. Gerontol. 2019;59(1):158–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny059 Weiskittle R, Tsang W, Schwabenbauer A, Andrew N, Mlinac M. Feasibility of a COVID-19 rapid response telehealth group addressing older adult worry and social isolation. Clin Gerontol. 2022;45(1):129–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2021.1906812 Yu J, Huang J, Yang Q. Long-Term Adoption or Abandonment of Smart Technology in the Chinese Elderly Home Care Environment: A Qualitative Research Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172440 Ahad A, Tahir M, Yau KLA. 5G-based smart healthcare network: architecture, taxonomy, challenges and future research directions. IEEE Access. 2019;7:100747–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930628 Sorocco KH, Bratkovich KL, Wingo R, Qureshi SM, Mason PJ. Integrating care coordination home telehealth and home based primary care in rural Oklahoma: a pilot study. Psychol Serv. 2013;10(3):350–2. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032785 Olsen M, Udo C, Dahlberg L, Boström AM. Older persons’ views on important values in Swedish home care service: a semi-structured interview study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:967–77. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S347886 Artificial intelligence for older people receiving long-term care: a systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness studies Naik N, Hameed BMZ, Sooriyaperakasam N, Vinayahalingam S, Patil V, Smriti K, et al. Transforming healthcare through a digital revolution: A review of digital healthcare technologies and solutions. Front Digit Health. 2022;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.919985 Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of "smart home" applications. Yearb Med Inform. 2008;17(01):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-16385802008 Chén OY, Roberts B. Personalized health care and public health in the digital age. Front Digital Health. 2021;3:595704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.595704 Facchinetti G, Petrucci G, Albanesi B, De Marinis MG, Piredda M. Can Smart Home Technologies Help Older Adults Manage Their Chronic Condition? A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021205 Alsbou N, Thirunilath NM, Ali I, editors. Smart Home Automation IoT System for Disabled and Elderly. In: IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS); 2022; Toronto. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS55184.2022.9795738 Thamman R, Janardhanan R. Cardiac rehabilitation using telemedicine: the need for tele cardiac rehabilitation. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020;21(4):497–500. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.201 Wurzer D, Spielhagen P, Siegmann A, Gercekcioglu A, Gorgass J, Henze S, et al. Remote monitoring of COVID-19 positive high-risk patients in domestic isolation: A feasibility study. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257095 Monaco A, Palmer K, Holm Ravn Faber N, Kohler I, Silva M, Vatland A, et al. Digital Health Tools for Managing Noncommunicable Diseases During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Patients and Caregivers. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e25652. https://doi.org/10.2196/25652 Galambos C, Rantz M, Craver A, Bongiorno M, Pelts M, Holik AJ, et al. Living With Intelligent Sensors: Older Adult and Family Member Perceptions. CIN: Comput Inform Nurs. 2019;37(12):615–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000555 Zhai J, Jiang H. Two-sample test with g-modeling and its applications. Stat Med. 2023;42(1):89–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9603 Asiri HM, Asiri AM, Alruwaili HF, Almazan J. A scoping review of different monitoring-technology devices in caring for older adults with cognitive impairment. Front Public Health. 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144636 Fjellså HMH, Husebø AML, Storm M. eHealth in care coordination for older adults living at home: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(10):e39584. https://doi.org/10.2196/39584 Silva CRDV, Lopes RH, de Goes BO, Martiniano CS, Fuentealba-Torres M, Arcêncio RA, et al. Digital health opportunities to improve primary health care in the context of COVID-19: scoping review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(2):e35380. https://doi.org/10.2196/35380 Murciano-Hueso A, Martín-García A-V, Cardoso AP. Technology and quality of life of older people in times of COVID: A qualitative study on their changed digital profile. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610459 Chen C, Ding S, Wang J. Digital health for aging populations. Nature Med. 2023;29(7):1623–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02391-8 Ienca M, Schneble C, Kressig RW, Wangmo T. Digital health interventions for healthy ageing: a qualitative user evaluation and ethical assessment. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02338-z Hu M, Sheng F. Blockchain-enabled cross-chain collaboration model for elderly health information from a whole process perspective. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1081539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1081539 Alvarez-Risco A, Del-Aguila-Arcentales S, Yáñez JA. Telemedicine in Peru as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic: perspective from a country with limited internet access. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;105(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0255 Kemp E, Trigg J, Beatty L, Christensen C, Dhillon HM, Maeder A, et al. Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: the need for a strategic approach. Health Promotion J Australia. 2021;32(S1):104–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.387 Magdalena M, Bujnowska F, Grata-Borkowska U. Use of telemedicine-based care for the aging and elderly: promises and pitfalls. Smart Homecare Technol Telehealth. 2015;3:91–105. https://doi.org/10.2147/SHTT.S59498 Fernandez-Luque L, Al Herbish A, Al Shammari R, Argente J, Bin-Abbas B, Deeb A, et al. Digital health for supporting precision medicine in pediatric endocrine disorders: opportunities for improved patient care. Front Pediatrics. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.715705 Eruchalu CN, Pichardo MS, Bharadwaj M, Rodriguez CB, Rodriguez JA, Bergmark RW, et al. The expanding digital divide: digital health access inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. J Urban Health. 2021;98(2):183–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00508-9 Nakayama LF, Binotti WW, Link Woite N, Fernandes CO, Alfonso PG, Celi LA, et al. The digital divide in Brazil and barriers to telehealth and equal digital health care: analysis of internet access using publicly available data. J Med Internet Res. 2023;21(25):e42483. https://doi.org/10.2196/42483 Rachid R, Fornazin M, Castro L, Gonçalves LH, Penteado BE. Saúde digital e a plataformização do Estado brasileiro. Ciênc Saúde Col. 2023;28(7):2143–53. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232023287.14302022 Adesão ao programa Informatiza APS nos estados brasileiros: um caminho à equidade em saúde digital Cattuto C, Spina A. The institutionalisation of digital public health: lessons learned from the COVID-19 app. Eur J Risk Reg. 2020;11(2):228–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.47 Ienca M, Vayena E. On the responsible use of digital data to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Med. 2020;26(4):463–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0832-5 Curioso WH. Building capacity and training for digital health: challenges and opportunities in Latin America. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(12):e16513. https://doi.org/10.2196/16513 Jokisch MR, Schmidt LI, Doh M. Acceptance of digital health services among older adults: Findings on perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, privacy concerns, ICT knowledge, and support seeking. Front Public Health. 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1073756 Lopes MACQ, Oliveira GMMd, Maia LM. Digital Health, Universal Right, Duty of the State? Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019;113. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190161 Naoum P, Pavi E, Athanasakis K. Economic evaluation of digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic review of the literature. Front Digital Health. 20213;3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.730755 Download references This study was partly financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 Ísis de Siqueira Silva & Aguinaldo José de Araújo Vilani Medeiros de Araújo Nunes & Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa WHO Collaborating Center on Health Workforce Policy and Planning Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Laboratório Associado de Sistemas Inteligentes Escola de Engenharia Universidade do Minho All authors read and approved the final manuscript The authors include six women and five men specialists in the field of public health and with extensive experience of the SUS One of the authors is Portuguese and a WHO consultant with experience in evaluating public health policies All the authors have experience in qualitative research and in the area of health evaluation and digital health seven of the authors have expertise in the methodology of scoping reviews and previous publications The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the authors' institute under CAEE 54853921.0.0000.5292 The authors declare no competing interests Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations The original online version of this article was revised: The authors reported that the affiliations of author Luís Velez Lapão was incorrect unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05120-z Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. The Movement for the Catalan Language in the 'Franja' promoted a Manifesto denouncing the “lamentable situation” of Catalan and Aragonese, languages spoken in the “Franja”, the name given to the Aragonese territories next to the border between Catalonia and Aragon. The Movement is protesting against the removal of the last law that recognised both languages in Aragon by its autonomic Parliament led by the People’s Party (PP) and the Regionalist Aragonese Party (PAR). This movement is also critical of everyday situations where Catalan and Aragonese are discriminated against, such as when in a school from Aragon the subject “Catalan Language” was called “Oriental Language”. So, the Franja’s Movement for Catalan Language is gathering signatures for its Manifesto so that Catalan has a more dignified status and the Government can implement linguistic policies for its normalisation in schools, institutions and public spaces.       According to the promoters of the Manifesto, these facts are not coincidental, but rather respond to a “calculated operation of discrediting and negation of the original language of the “Franja”, which is Catalan, and has the objective of pushing Catalan aside in schools and society”. At the moment, several civil and political associations have signed the Manifesto to change this situation.   The sociolinguist Natxo Sorolla, expert in Catalan and Aragonese language in Aragon, has recently criticised the new law passed by the regional parliament. Sorolla highlights that this reform replaces the terms “Catalan” and “Aragonese” to acronyms referring to “Aragonese languages with its linguistic modalities predominantly used in northern and eastern areas of the Autonomous Community”. Sorolla warns that the current law could lead to confusion because it does not specify if these “Aragonese languages” are one, two, or more. Furthermore, the sociolinguist also remarks that the new legislation does not recognise Catalan and Aragonese as minority languages, but as “original and historical” on the same level as Spanish, which does not need any protection and promotion.      Get the day's biggest stories right to your phone Police are still facing a blank wall over the alleged 'mass grave’ in Sapad Residents have dug out seven bodies buried in a shallow grave at Sitio Lapao in Barangay Karkum morning on Sunday Authorities have already identified three of the seven bodies The cadavers were brought to a funeral homes for the post mortem examination which happened in a remote area where communication signal is very challenging Investigation on the reported ‘mass grave’ is still ongoing gmaregionaltv.com is home to the latest stories produced by news teams of GMA Regional TV from stations in key areas across the Philippines gmaregionaltv@gmanetwork.com About us Advertise with us MENU ILIGAN CITY (MindaNews / 8 January) – Authorities revealed Monday the identities of the seven dead persons exhumed altogether from a shallow grave Sunday afternoon at Sitio Lapao, Barangay Karkum, in Sapad town, Lanao del Norte. In his report, Police Major Alibsar Daraba, Sapad police chief, said all the victims had multiple gunshot wounds in the different parts of their bodies. He identified them as Joselito Gaviola,  Marly Gaviola, Elvie Gaviola  Lenara, Epifanio Lenara, Jopay Lenara, Jomar Lenara and Epifanio Lenara Jr., all residents of Purok Dama de Noche, Sitio Lugimit, Poblacion Margosatubig, Zamboanga del Sur. Four of the victims were males and three were females. The supposed “salvage” victims or victims of summary execution were buried in a small shallow grave, which authorities uncovered following a report from a concerned civilian. The area is about 30 kilometers southwest of Sapad town. A team from the 51st Armor Company of the 5th Mechanized Infantry Battalion helped the Sapad police in exhuming the cadavers. Their remains were brought to a funeral home in Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte, Daraba said. Police Colonel Sandy Valles, Zamboanga del Sur police director, said they are still investigating the possibility that the victims were abducted and killed somewhere in Zamboanga del Sur, and buried in Sapad town. The immediate families were expected to arrive in Kapatagan today, January 8,  to claim the dead bodies and to provide information to authorities. (Richel V. Umel / MindaNews) 23C Saturn St. GSIS Subdivision, Davao City Philippines Tel. No.: 082 297 4360 editor [at] mindanews [dot] com — The neologism introduced by the new law poses a worrying question about its future consequences. It constitutes the clearest declaration of a narrow conception of Aragonʼs linguistic and cultural richness. — The neologism introduced by the new law poses a worrying question about its future consequences. It constitutes the clearest declaration of a narrow conception of Aragonʼs linguistic and cultural richness. ACN / Pau Cortina This progressive advance of the language as a whole coincides with “regional unbalance” as underlined by the Catalan Language Observatory in their 2011 report are accentuated “by the political offensive against the Catalan language and the legislative siege” it is victim of.  A constant growth in spite of a political “offensive” against Catalan At European Union level, Catalan ranked 16th in its number of speakers