You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser or activate Google Chrome Frame to improve your experience The latest financial stability report ranks Tesla and Hyundai Electric in the top five spots out of 55 manufacturers A Varta lithium-ion battery exposed at the Museum Autovision Image: Klaus Ableiter/Wikimedia Commons/https://bit.ly/2Wd909f Sinovoltaics, a Hong Kong-based technical compliance and quality assurance service firm, has released its Q3 PV Energy Storage Manufacturer Ranking Report it provides financial stability scores over the past three years for 55 suppliers The report is available to download for free Some changes to the top ten segment since the previous edition included South Korea’s LG Energy moved out of the top ten segment to seventeenth place while compatriot Hyundai Electric entered the top ten The report includes a chart that groups manufacturers into those with scores that put them in the safe zone and those with scores that indicate distress In the safe zone this quarter were 20 companies There was no change in the overall number of battery industry companies that were tracked in the report The analysis of the publicly traded battery producers uses a balance sheet-based model and publicly available financial information to track financial strength over the past three years from September 2021 to June 2024 to provide insight into the changes in the scores over time The so-called Altmann Z-scores are based on a quantitative formula that uses publicly available information about corporate income and balance sheet values to measure the financial health of a company It assesses a company’s financial strength through a credit-strength test based on profitability A score that is 1.1 or lower indicates a higher probability of bankruptcy within the next two years More articles from Valerie Thompson Please be mindful of our community standards and website in this browser for the next time I comment Δdocument.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value" By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy Δdocument.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value" This website uses cookies to anonymously count visitor numbers. View our privacy policy. × The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this Close Volume 10 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01338 The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether former childhood cancer patients who developed a subsequent secondary primary neoplasm (SPN) are characterized by elevated spontaneous chromosomal instability or cellular and chromosomal radiation sensitivity as surrogate markers of compromised DNA repair compared to childhood cancer patients with a first primary neoplasm (FPN) only or tumor-free controls Primary skin fibroblasts were obtained in a nested case-control study including 23 patients with a pediatric FPN 22 matched patients with a pediatric FPN and an SPN Clonogenic cell survival and cytogenetic aberrations in Giemsa-stained first metaphases were assessed after X-irradiation in G1 or on prematurely condensed chromosomes of cells irradiated and analyzed in G2 Fluorescence in situ hybridization was applied to investigate spontaneous transmissible aberrations in selected donors No significant difference in clonogenic survival or the average yield of spontaneous or radiation-induced aberrations was found between the study populations two donors with an SPN showed striking spontaneous chromosomal instability occurring as high rates of numerical and structural aberrations or non-clonal and clonal translocations No correlation was found between radiation sensitivity and a susceptibility to a pediatric FPN or a treatment-associated SPN the results of this unique case-control study show genomic stability and normal radiation sensitivity in normal somatic cells of donors with an early and high intrinsic or therapy-associated tumor risk These findings provide valuable information for future studies on the etiology of sporadic childhood cancer and therapy-related SPN as well as for the establishment of predictive biomarkers based on altered DNA repair processes despite such correlations there is still a large variation in the individual susceptibility to treatment-induced SPN which has been attributed to genetic variation the causalities for the vast majority of sporadic childhood cancers or an inherent susceptibility to iatrogenic SPN remain to be unraveled to identify patients who are at high risk for a pediatric FPN or a therapy-related SPN based on such surrogate biomarkers of compromised DNA repair and genome instability is still a major and unsolved clinical challenge we examined spontaneous chromosome aberrations as well as cellular and chromosomal IR sensitivity in primary skin fibroblasts obtained from a carefully matched case-control study nested in a cohort of childhood cancer survivors who were successfully treated for a sporadic FPN and either developed an SPN or not Our findings will provide relevant clinical information whether sporadic and IR-induced chromosome aberrations and thus a limited DNA repair capacity in normal somatic cells can be used as a measure of risk assessment and stratification for the development of pediatric FPN or subsequent SPN The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Rhineland-Palatinate [No Clonogenic survival after X-ray exposure of fibroblasts in G1 To obtain primary human skin fibroblasts from cancer patients biopsies were taken on the inside of the cubital region and for NN donors at the site of the planned surgery Biopsies were dissected and kept in rich cell culture medium (Amniogrow Germany) in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 to allow for outgrowth and expansion of primary fibroblasts cells were cultured in Dulbecco‘s Minimal Essential Medium (Sigma-Aldrich USA) containing 1% non-essential amino acids (Biochrom Passaging was done using 0.05% trypsin with 0.1% ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetate (Biochrom cells were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen Only cells with <20 population doublings were used for experiments To irradiate fibroblasts selectively in G1 for clonogenic survival and the cytogenetic G1 assay cells were synchronized by contact inhibition fibroblasts were seeded at a density of 9,000 cells/cm2 in cell culture dishes with a diameter of 10 cm (Greiner Bio-One GmbH Germany) and were allowed to grow at least for 14 days with a medium change every 4 days Synchronization in G1 was confirmed by flow cytometric cell cycle analysis revealing that more than 90% of the population was in G1 when the cells were exposed to X-rays To irradiate and analyze cells selectively in G2 (G2 assay) 9,000 cells/cm2 were seeded in cell culture dishes with a diameter of 10 cm (Greiner Bio-One GmbH Two days later exponentially growing cells were exposed to X-rays Irradiation was performed with a D3150 X-Ray Therapy System (Gulmay Ltd. UK) at 140 kV and a dose rate of 3.6 Gy/min at room temperature kept at the same conditions in the radiation device control room and survival curves were established considering the plating efficiencies of sham-irradiated controls The average numbers of surviving cells per technical replicate counted as colonies with at least 50 cells after exposure to 0 and 6 Gy X-rays from all available samples were 59.3 ± 39.3 and 25.6 ± 20.7 (mean ± standard deviation) The fraction of tetraploid cells was calculated as the ratio of metaphases with 92 chromosomes divided by the total number of all analyzed diploid and tetraploid metaphases To assess the proportion of tetraploid cells on average 506 metaphases were scored for each sample For the analysis of chromatid aberrations in cells exposed to 1 Gy X-rays in G2, 2.25 h after irradiation 50 nM calyculin A (LC Laboratories, Woburn, US) was added for 45 min to the cultures to induce G2-PCC. Detached cells were collected and chromosome preparation and Giemsa staining were performed as described previously (38) Chromatid aberrations were scored as breaks and exchanges (radials) in G2-PCCs with at least 46 chromosome pieces which are usually considered to be achromatic lesions rather than true chromatid discontinuities were included due to the obscure structure of chromosomes after G2-PCC Chromatid exchanges were rare and scored as one aberration Isochromatid breaks were scored as 2 chromatid breaks 100 G2-PCCs were analyzed for each control sample and 50 G2-PCCs were analyzed for each irradiated sample The yield of spontaneous aberrations in sham-irradiated cells was subtracted from that in irradiated samples. If the desired number of metaphases or G2-PCCs was not achieved due to poor proliferation even in repeated experiments, all available metaphases or G2-PCCs were used for the analysis. The exact numbers of analyzed cells are provided in Tables 3, 4 Spontaneous and radiation-induced chromosome aberrations per cell in first post-exposure metaphases collected 48 h after irradiation of fibroblasts in G1 with 3 Gy X-rays (G1 assay) Spontaneous and radiation-induced chromatid aberrations per G2-PCC 3 h after irradiation of exponentially growing fibroblasts with 1 Gy X-rays (G2 assay) basic aberration forms such as translocations (t) or dicentric chromosomes (dic) are described Chromosome fragments containing a centromere are indicated by an apostrophe An uppercase “T” indicates a truncated centric element which has become visibly shortened a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 1 and 2 is designated “t (1′-2) (2′-1).” Identical chromosome aberrations were termed clonal if they were present in at least two metaphases of one sample For each sample 100 diploid metaphases were analyzed The clonogenic survival after IR exposure was analyzed using a linear mixed model with the fixed variables dose, dose2, group (NN, FPN, or SPN) and intercept including the patient as a random effect. The model was fitted using the lmer function in lme4 R package (43). Aberrations scored in the G1 and G2 assay were analyzed separately using the R package glmmTMB (44) Mixed models were fitted to estimate the effect of dose and tumor entity on the number of aberrations The negative binomial model with the patient as a random variable fitted best Adding the matching group as an additional random variable did not improve the model and tumor entity showed no significant impact on aberrations and were therefore excluded from the final model The relationship between two variables was analyzed using Pearson's test and is provided as the correlation coefficient (r) All levels of significance were set at p < 0.05 Average rates of chromosome aberrations or the fraction of surviving cells of pooled donors of the different study populations are provided as the mean ± standard deviation An overview of the summarized characteristics of cancer patients is provided in Table 1 Total numbers of 23 cases with FPN only and 22 cases with the same FPN and a subsequent SPN as well as 22 NN donors were enclosed in the study Hematopoietic and lymphoid cancers represented the majority of FPN (76%) and only a minor fraction of SPN (36%) Information on oncologic therapies is provided to the best of our knowledge based on the documentation of treating physicians voluntarily and on patient-based self-reports during a medical interview All FPNs except for two retinoblastomas were treated by CT since no matching of oncologic therapies has been performed between the corresponding FPN and SPN cases differences in the application of RT were noted as follows: Four SPN and two FPN cases received radiochemotherapy compared to their respective FPN and SPN counterparts treated with CT only In at least two other cases RT was administered to different or unknown anatomic regions One FPN donor was treated by surgery only for unilateral retinoblastoma whereas the matched SPN case received RT only for bilateral retinoblastoma One FPN and six SPN patients received a bone marrow or stem cell transplant during therapy without preconditioning by total body RT RT was administered locally to the site of a solid tumor as cranial or craniospinal irradiation for leukemia mainly at the thoracic and neck region for lymphoma or as radioiodine-therapy for papillary thyroid cancer According to the common RT plans for the enclosed tumor entities the treatment fields of partial-body RT did not involve the site of skin biopsy near the cubital region Due to the retrospective nature of the study with an inevitable long follow-up skin biopsies were collected from young adults on average 20 years after the diagnosis of the pediatric FPN and on average 10 years after the diagnosis of the adolescent SPN The cellular IR sensitivity of primary fibroblasts was measured as clonogenic survival after X-ray exposure of cells in G1. The summarized results for FPN, SPN, and NN donors are presented in Figure 1 and raw data for each donor is provided in Table 2 and SPN donors were similar with fractions of 6.4 ± 3.9% and 6.8 ± 3.9% of cells forming colonies no significant difference in the fraction of surviving cells was found between NN and FPN or SPN donors Mean surviving fractions at 2 Gy (SF2) of NN Clonogenic survival of primary skin fibroblasts from donors with no neoplasm (NN n = 23) or an FPN and a subsequent second primary neoplasm (SPN Error bars represent the standard deviation All lines were fitted by a linear-quadratic function Box and whisker plots of (A) spontaneous and (B) radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in primary skin fibroblasts from donors with no neoplasm (NN) or an FPN and a subsequent second primary neoplasm (SPN) Aberrations were scored in metaphases of the first cell cycle after exposure in G1 to 3 Gy X-rays The inner line represents the median value whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values (C) Two representative Giemsa-stained complete metaphases from an SPN donor showing an abnormally high rate of spontaneous numerical and structural aberrations Differences in the morphology of chromosomes between metaphases result from the different degrees of condensation Structural aberrations are exemplarily indicated (arrow: dicentric chromosome Representative metaphases of an SPN donor carrying the spontaneous clonal translocations (A) t (15′-1) (1′T) and (B) t (1′-5) (5′T) after Giemsa staining (left panel) Translocations are indicated by red arrows in metaphase spreads after Giemsa staining and three-color FISH After irradiation of fibroblasts with 3 Gy X-rays in G1 the mean yield of IR-induced chromosome aberrations in first post-exposure mitoses of a total of 61 donors was 0.650 ± 0.129 per cell. Shown in Figure 2B the different sub-groups of donors had comparable average rates of IR-induced aberrations per cell of 0.642 ± 0.114 in NN donors 0.683 ± 0.148 in FPN donors and 0.628 ± 0.124 in SPN donors For a qualitative examination of the accuracy of DSB repair the average rates of RI interchromosomal exchanges scored as dicentric chromosomes were compared between the different donor groups RI dicentrics occurred at similar frequencies per cell of 0.321 ± 0.062 in NN donors Box and whisker plots of (A) spontaneous and (B) radiation-induced chromatid aberrations in primary skin fibroblasts from donors with no neoplasm (NN) Aberrations were scored in prematurely condensed chromosomes of G2 cells (G2-PCCs) 3 h after the exposure of exponentially growing cells to 1 Gy X-rays With increasing success in tumor control due to the constant progress of diagnostics and therapeutic strategies in oncology, treatment-related adverse late-effects inevitably gain high clinical relevance. Iatrogenic high-grade toxicities and second primary malignancies are a major threat and cause of long-term morbidity for the continuously increasing number of cancer survivors, in particular for childhood cancer patients (1, 2, 6) The present study examined if a relation between the susceptibility to pediatric FPNs or therapy-related SPNs and impaired genome maintenance exists measurements of sporadic chromosomal instability and cellular or chromosomal IR sensitivity in normal somatic cells were performed in matched SPN We observed no significant difference for clonogenic cell survival after IR or the average yield of spontaneous and IR-induced chromosome aberrations between the study populations Striking spontaneous chromosomal abnormities were found in two donors with SPN only The results obtained in this study population indicate that the etiology of sporadic childhood cancer or the risk for SPN might underlie limited DNA repair capacities and provide useful information for future studies including the need for other biomarkers Applying γH2AX fluorescence intensity measurements by flow cytometry as a surrogate marker for DSBs in patient-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines established on average 24 years after the diagnosis of the FPN an association between higher rates of basal as well as IR-induced DSBs and the risk of SPN in childhood cancer survivors was demonstrated no tumor-free controls were included in the study our results do not support previous findings of overall elevated spontaneous or IR-induced chromosome aberrations in normal somatic cells of individuals with early and high cancer incidence High-resolution cytogenetic analysis by FISH for all donors which allows much more sensitive detection of cytogenetic damage including transmissible aberrations that are missed by conventional solid-staining may sustain such findings in the future testing the study population of this work for their proficiency to deal with replication stress-associated DNA damage induced by physical obstacles to the replication machinery is a future task to mimic and investigate the vulnerability to such pathophysiological processes related to cancer risk Detailed questionnaires will provide information on lifestyle socio-economical and anthropometric factors as well as on health and medical radiation history including phantom based dosimetry to obtain distinct organ doses Detailed analysis of genetic predispositions and other molecular-biological factors is already underway Next-generation sequencing approaches and functional assays on DNA repair in a high-throughput design will be performed to unravel risk factors and potential predictive biomarkers for childhood cancers and treatment-related second malignancies for the most benefit of future cancer patients All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Rhineland-Palatinate [No The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study and JM: analysis and interpretation of data (e.g. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version This study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest Disque-Kaiser for excellent technical assistance and cancer patients as well as healthy donors who have participated in this study The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.01338/full#supplementary-material G2 premature chromosome condensation; FISH 24-multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization; t phosphorylated ataxia telangiectasia mutated 1. ^Marron M An innovative nested case-control study to identify genetic predispositions of childhood and second primary cancers related to ionizing radiation - the KiKme study PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Can we reduce the incidence of second primary malignancies occurring after radiotherapy PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 3. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), Statistics Review 1975-2015. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute (2016). Available online at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2002/ (accessed September 18 Long-term population-based risks of second malignant neoplasms after childhood cancer in Britain Risk of a second malignant neoplasm among 5-year survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence in British Columbia Risk of second malignancies in long-term survivors of childhood cancer Radiotherapy-induced malignancies: review of clinical features and evolving approaches for mitigating risk The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers radiosensitivity to cancer and susceptibility to acute tissue reactions in radiotherapy-treated cancer patients A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity Individual radiosensitivity in oncological patients: linking adverse normal tissue reactions and genetic features Clinical and functional assays of radiosensitivity and radiation-induced second cancer Chromosome condensation outside of mitosis: mechanisms and new tools PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients with a known or putative genetic predisposition Radiation-induced micronucleus induction in lymphocytes identifies a high frequency of radiosensitive cases among breast cancer patients: a test for predisposition Increased chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients: a comparison of two assays X-ray-induced chromatid damage in relation to DNA repair and cancer incidence in family members DNA repair proficiency in breast cancer patients and their first-degree relatives doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970926)73:1<20::AID-IJC4>3.0.CO;2-3 Chromosomal radiosensitivity in G2-phase lymphocytes identifies breast cancer patients with distinctive tumour characteristics Mutagen sensitivity and risk of gliomas: a case-control analysis Gamma-radiation sensitivity and risk of glioma Chromosomal radiosensitivity as a marker of predisposition to common cancers Increased G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in cancer patients: the role of cdk1/cyclin-B activity level in the mechanisms involved Sensitivity to radiation-induced chromosome damage may be a marker of genetic predisposition in young head and neck cancer patients Chromosomal radiosensitivity in young cancer patients: possible evidence of genetic predisposition G(2) chromosomal radiosensitivity in Danish survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer and their offspring Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage and risk of second cancer in childhood cancer survivors DNA repair alterations in children with pediatric malignancies: novel opportunities to identify patients at risk for high-grade toxicities DNA-damage foci to detect and characterize DNA repair alterations in children treated for pediatric malignancies 32. Bonassi S, Hagmar L, Stromberg U, Montagud AH, Tinnerberg H, Forni A, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer independently of exposure to carcinogens. European study group on cytogenetic biomarkers and health. Cancer Res. (2000) 60:1619–25. Available online at: https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/60/6/1619 Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer: results from a pooled cohort study of 22 358 subjects in 11 countries Second malignancies following childhood cancer treatment in Germany from 1980 to 2014 International classification of childhood cancer PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar New giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Biodosimetry based on gamma-H2AX quantification and cytogenetics after partial- and total-body irradiation during fractionated radiotherapy Classification and relationships of induced chromosomal structural changes PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Three-color chromosome painting as seen through the eyes of mFISH: another look at radiation-induced exchanges and their conversion to whole-genome equivalency Duplicated chromosomal fragments stabilize shortened telomeres in normal human IMR-90 cells before transition to senescence Analyzing radiation-induced complex chromosome rearrangements by combinatorial painting doi: 10.1667/0033-7587.2001.155[0643:ARICCR]2.0.CO;2 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling Early life factors and risk of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma Chromosomal radiosensitivity and low penetrance predisposition to cancer PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Elevated G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in Irish breast cancer patients: a comparison with other studies Fanconi anemia: adult head and neck cancer and hematopoietic mosaicism Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia in patients with bone marrow failure Chromosome fragility in the buccal epithelium in patients with Fanconi anemia In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations Influence of nuclear geometry on the formation of genetic rearrangements in human cells Relative proximity of chromosome territories influences chromosome exchange partners in radiation-induced chromosome rearrangements in primary human bronchial epithelial cells Chromosomal aberrations in young cancer patients Nonclonal chromosome aberrations and genome chaos in somatic and germ cells from patients and survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma Nonclonal chromosomal aberrations in childhood leukemia survivors Radiation-induced premature senescence is associated with specific cytogenetic changes Frequent induction of chromosomal aberrations in in vivo skin fibroblasts after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: hints to chromosomal instability after irradiation Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability Stress-induced DNA damage biomarkers: applications and limitations Spix C and Schmidberger H (2020) Spontaneous and Radiation-Induced Chromosome Aberrations in Primary Fibroblasts of Patients With Pediatric First and Second Neoplasms Received: 19 November 2019; Accepted: 26 June 2020; Published: 07 August 2020 Copyright © 2020 Zahnreich, Poplawski, Hartel, Eckhard, Galetzka, Hankeln, Löbrich, Marron, Mirsch, Ritter, Scholz-Kreisel, Spix and Schmidberger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited in accordance with accepted academic practice distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms *Correspondence: Sebastian Zahnreich, emFobnJlaWNAdW5pLW1haW56LmRl Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher 94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or goodLearn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish A German-Israeli research group has gathered for three days to discuss which storage technologies may outperform lithium-ion batteries in the future They concluded that there is no such a thing as a “post Li‐ion” era in sight They recommended a “side‐by‐side” approach for multiple technologies in different applications as well as the hybridization of technologies The group highlighted the strong potential of redox flow storage Researchers from Germany's Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU) and the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology started their recent three-day discussion on the future of energy storage with a basic assumption: “In this report it is shown that the quest for post Li‐ion and Li battery technologies is incorrect in its essence.” They talked about the kind of storage technologies that might be considered solid alternatives to Li‐ion storage and their conclusion was unequivocal: There is no end in sight for the “post Li‐ion” era the group concluded that the current vibe about the need of future technologies after the lithium era and the quest for which new technologies can replace lithium‐based battery technology are somewhat inappropriate and misleading (partially incorrect) they have recommended a “side‐by‐side” approach for all storage technologies They also identified the technologies that they see as more promising for the future Sodium‐oin batteries (Na‐Ion) which rely on the same ion storage principle of lithium-ion technologies are considered an interesting alternative as they could provide an affordable solution due to potential shortages of lithium and cobalt They are also easy to ship and have strong potential for further raw material cost reduction the cost and environmental friendliness of the layered oxide cathode materials proposed so far appear to be the major advantages of sodium‐ion batteries,” the group stated It added that Na‐ion batteries face similar safety issues as Li‐ion batteries in large-scale applications but development is still limited and not enough is known about failure modes Their use is recommended for stationary energy storage systems and light‐duty vehicles for short‐range transportation The main advantages of redox flow storage are the scalability of storage capacity the ability to operate in most environmental temperatures The storage capacity of commercial vanadium redox flow storage systems currently ranges from 4 MWh to 40 MWh while overall costs are $550/kWh in comparison to more than $200/kWh for Li‐ion Safety issues are mainly related to hazardous material spillage The technology could also suffer from the non-homogenous deposition of metal ions potentially leading to shape change and dendrite growth high-polarization losses due to sluggish kinetics of the reactions “Redox flow batteries are expected to outperform Li‐ion only for stationary applications where their key feature of storing the energetic chemicals in external reservoir enables large‐scale energy storage from renewable sources during peak‐production times and supplying when production falls developments of advanced materials and chemistries are said to be necessary to overcome the limitations of the current concepts and improve the system performances which also analyzed metal air batteries and multivalent metal anode-based storage at the gathering they concluded that lithium-ion battery technologies will remain crucial for many years to come They said that the search for a post-lithium technology is conceptually incorrect “The quest should be for multi‐technologies for different applications as well as hybridization of technologies,” they explained The results of the meeting were presented in Side by Side Battery Technologies with Lithium‐Ion Based Batteries which was recently published in Advanced Energy Materials More articles from Emiliano Bellini Problem is so many fake lithium ion batteries out there..dangerous fake batteries Sinovoltaics has released its latest energy storage manufacturers ranking report based on balance sheet assessments and publicly available financial information followed by South Korean’s LG Energy Solution along with US-based Solid Power in the top five Sinovoltaics, a Hong Kong-based technical compliance and quality assurance service firm, has released its latest Energy Storage Manufacturers Ranking which is global in scope and covers 55 manufacturers Results are calculated from June 2020 until March 2024 to provide insight into the stability of the scores over time The ranking uses a so-called Altmann Z-score a quantitative formula to analyze multiple corporate income and balance sheet values to gauge the financial health of a company It assesses a company’s financial strength based on publicly available information through a credit-strength test based on profitability while a higher score of 2.6 or greater indicates a solid financial position Sinovoltaics has published several other manufacturer rankings this year, including reports focused on inverter manufacturers and module manufacturers It points out that although the reports do not assess the quality of the equipment they can be used by buyers and other industry stakeholders as an element of the due diligence process or to help identify financially stable partners An international research team has conducted a techno-economical comparison between lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for stationary energy storage and has found the former has a lower LCOE and net present cost which was performed assuming the use of the batteries in connection with a 10 kW the scientists concluded that lithium-ion batteries are the most viable solution A Belgian-Ethiopian research team has compared the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and net present cost (NPC) of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for stationary energy storage and has found that the former are The analysis of both storage technologies was modeled through the HOMER software and the Equivalent Circuit Model (ECM) which describes the pure electrical behavior of a battery in terms of voltages “The ECM model is built-in using electrical components which respond to the battery electrically,” the scientists explained HOMER is software used for the optimization of the components to be used in the grid-connected electrical power system.” The analysis considered the charge and discharge rate influence on the performance of both kinds of batteries under typical application conditions assuming their use in a grid-connected photovoltaic system (PVGCS) with an inclination angle of 16 degrees and an azimuth angle of 0 degrees “The system consisted of a 10 kWp photovoltaic array a grid-connected converter of 5 kW capacity and a li-ion battery of 167 Ah with a load having a 4-5 kVA rating,” the group explained the grid electricity price was estimated at €0.084/kWh lead-acid batteries have an average energy capital cost of €253.50/kWh and lithium-ion batteries and that their total average power cost is €333.50/kWh and €2,210/kWh the environmental impact of lead-acid is categorized as having a high impact whereas li-ion has a medium/low environmental impact,” they also specified the academics found that li-ion and lead-acid batteries have almost comparable charge and discharge properties but they also ascertained that the lithium-ion devices have the same discharge characteristics response as lead-acid batteries even with less capacity and a lower number of battery units while also providing longer lifetime characteristics they found that the micro-grid formed by the PV system and the lithium-ion batteries has a net present cost of €14,399 while that of the PV system with lead-acid batteries is around €15,106 the latter reached a value of €0.34/kWh and the former “The reduced number of batteries affects the per-unit COE and therefore the COE of the micro-grid system with li-ion batteries is lower as compared to lead-acid batteries,” they further explained adding that li-ion batteries have lower lifetime costs when associated with PV and reduced losses if compared to lead-acid batteries the PVGCS system with li-ion batteries requires 40% lesser batteries as compared to lead-acid batteries and supporting in provision of reliable power supply with lower cost.” The comparison between the two storage technologies can be found in the paper Techno-economic analysis of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries in stationary energy storage application which was recently published in the Journal of Energy Storage The research group comprises scientists from the Vrije Universiteit Brussels In the beginning you write that Li is cheaper but the numbers cited later seem to show the opposite I don’t understand how they can say that lead acid batteries are more harmful to the environment than Lithium when 99% of a lead acid battery is recyclable Recycling Lithium batteries is only now being talked about with scant little recycling being done When Lithium batteries hit the $200/kWh price I’ll certainly entertain the idea of switching over the replace what I have in Lithium would cost me $40K To replace my current lead-acid battery bank The numbers just don’t make sense in this I think that need to be more clear about the full lifecycle for both Recycle it’s harder on Li-ion than on lead If good management is present on recycle leas battery process What is missing from the article is the # of charging cycles from lead-acid being much lower than li-ion What is claimed elsewhere is that lead-acid is good for only 500 cycles versus thousands for li-ion So that is where the arguing should commence