This subscription does not include access to ft.com or the FT App
Essential digital access to quality FT journalism on any device
Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders
Terms & Conditions apply
Discover all the plans currently available in your country
See why over a million readers pay to read the Financial Times
You don't have permission to access the page you requested
What is this page?The website you are visiting is protected.For security reasons this page cannot be displayed
Please enable JS and disable any ad blocker
Blow to Starmer’s hopes of post-Brexit reset and efforts to clear asylum claims amid rise of populist right
A UK request for access to shared European Union crime and illegal migration data has reportedly been rejected in a blow to Keir Starmer’s hopes of a post-Brexit relations “reset”
British negotiators have been hoping to reach a deal on gaining access to the Schengen Information System (SIS)
a vital tool for sharing police alerts across borders within the area where 29 countries have abolished passport controls
European officials were reported by the Times to have ruled out allowing access to it and to the bloc’s centralised fingerprinting system
which stores information on illegal migrants
Access to the records would be a significant boost to attempts by the Labour government to clear Britain’s asylum claims and appeals backlog at a time when political opponents on the populist right are on the rise
The prime minister suggested last year at an Interpol annual general assembly in Glasgow that EU leaders had shown an interest in giving the UK access to the intelligence database used to identify people seeking asylum
Asked whether he could detect enthusiasm from EU leaders about giving the UK access to Eurodac data as part of a new security deal
there is an appetite to work more closely with us on this
said on Monday that the prime minister had cast his reset of relations with the EU as a “magic bullet” to deliver on Labour’s manifesto pledge to “smash the gangs” when it came to illegal Channel crossings
He needs to start taking action in the UK and stop creeping to Brussels,” Lord Moylan added
The European Commission has been approached for comment
In the absence of a deal on giving access to Eurodac and Schengen data, one area of potential progress revolves around work and travel freedoms. The EU is prepared to make major concessions in negotiations to allow British and European 18- to 30-year-olds to travel and work freely, the Guardian reported last month.
there have been suggestions that figures in the British government have made access to EU databases a “red line” in negotiations over such a youth mobility scheme
Free newsletterA digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day
The previous UK government signed a deal earlier last year for Britain work more closely with the EU’s border agency to stop small boats crossing the Channel
But the lack of access to the Eurodac fingerprinting system – which stores more than 7m fingerprint records and was lost to Britain with the ending of the Brexit transition period in December 2020 – limits potential collaboration
Access would help returns by proving individuals had rightful residence in other countries
is one of the three pillars that the UK government has been working on as part of a touted “reset” of UK-EU relations
The others are on foreign policy and security cooperation and growth and trade cooperation
BRUSSELS — The spring drought plaguing Europe since March is worsening and spreading to more countries, the European Commission's scientific service warned today
A lack of rainfall and warmer than usual weather have dried out soils and sapped rivers across large stretches of Central and Eastern Europe
including the continent's grain production powerhouses Poland and Ukraine
Dry conditions are starting to spread to almost every corner of the continent
the Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) said in a new report
as well as the eastern Mediterranean region
are experiencing broadening warning drought conditions
Similar conditions are emerging in north-western Europe," they write
The "warning" stage is the second of three drought development categories used by the JRC's European Drought Observatory
In the EU, only the Iberian peninsula, southern France and most of Italy have been spared so far, according to the observatory's latest update. In contrast, parts of Cyprus, Greece and the Balkans, as well as Turkey, have reached the red "alert" stage.
Forecasts for the coming months suggest higher than usual temperatures up to July, the scientists say. Rainfall predictions are less clear, though some forecasts point to drier conditions over large parts of northern Europe, including the United Kingdom, parts of Germany and the Benelux countries, the JRC report notes.
While other factors such as water mismanagement contribute to dry conditions, droughts are predicted to become more frequent and intense in Europe as a result of climate change.
People rarely think about Europe’s criss-crossing energy system. We tell you how it works, what went wrong (and right) on Monday and what happens next.
There has not been any type of intrusion in the electrical network control systems,” authorities say.
Portugal also remains in the dark following mass power outage south of the Pyrenees.
The idea will be one of several options Brussels will suggest in May to sever Russian energy links.
Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world
2025 at 8:25 AM EDTBookmarkSaveTakeaways NEWThe European Union is set to propose measures to ban Russian gas imports by the end of 2027
as the bloc pushes to sever ties with the country that was once its biggest energy supplier
The EU is moving ahead with a long-held intention to phase out Russian fossil fuels
after earlier this year delaying the release of its “road map” in order to assess the impact of US efforts to end the war in Ukraine
according to people familiar with the matter
Russian gas flows to Europe dropped sharply in the wake of Moscow’s full invasion in 2022
through a pipeline via Turkey and shipments of liquefied natural gas
This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks
The action you just performed triggered the security solution
There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase
You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked
Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page
This interactive dashboard provides a weekly integrated epidemiological summary for influenza
respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) and the WHO European Region
The summary for the EU/EEA is provided by ECDC and the summary for the WHO European Region is provided by WHO Regional Office for Europe
ERVISS describes the epidemiological and virological situation for respiratory virus infections across the EU/EEA and the WHO European Region and follows the principles of integrated respiratory virus surveillance outlined in Operational considerations for respiratory virus surveillance in Europe
Seasonal influenza is a preventable infectious disease with mostly respiratory symptoms
It is caused by influenza virus and is easily transmitted
predominantly via the droplet and contact routes and by indirect spread from respiratory secretions on hands etc
surveillance and laboratory guidance and how to protect yourself and others
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory virus that usually causes mild
The EU called for restraint from Israel on Monday after the country’s security Cabinet approved an expanded military operation in Gaza
“The European Union is concerned at the planned extension of the operation by Israeli forces in Gaza
which will result in further casualties and suffering for the Palestinian population
We urge Israel to exercise the utmost restraint,” European Commission spokesperson Anouar El Anouni said during a press briefing Monday
The Israeli plan reportedly includes capturing and occupying territory in the Gaza Strip
where it has been waging war against Hamas militants since October 2023
Responding to a question from POLITICO on whether the EU is considering sanctions should Israel disregard its calls
El Anouni said: “I will not enter into any speculations on any foresight or any reactions that we might have
and we will be re-calling it as much as necessary
The security Cabinet — an inner grouping within Israel’s broader Cabinet focusing on foreign and defense policy — also gave preliminary approval to resume humanitarian aid deliveries through private companies. The United Nations said the move would violate basic humanitarian principles and vowed not to cooperate
The new military phase is reportedly set to begin following U.S. President Donald Trump’s visit to the Middle East, scheduled for May 13-16. It comes despite repeated warnings from the U.N. that “serious violations” of international law have occurred in Gaza
where Israel has killed more than 50,000 people in a retaliatory assault for Hamas’ violent attack on Oct
“We are finally going to occupy the Gaza Strip. We will stop being afraid of the word ‘occupation,’” Israel’s hard-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said during a conference on Monday
“Excellent result,” cheers former Polish PM Mateusz Morawiecki
President Donald Trump’s efforts to end the conflict have proved fruitless so far
An uptick in gang violence has seen more than a dozen shootings so far this year
Russia has yet to prove it wants to end the war
The Scientific Council of the European Research Council welcomes the offer of substantial additional budget from the European Commission for the development of a new ERC funding instrument offering larger, longer-term grants. These 'super grants' were announced this morning by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in her speech at the Sorbonne
she spoke at the "Choose Europe for Science" conference
The operational details of the new funding instrument are being developed by the Scientific Council and will be announced in due course
Closing speech by the President at the ‘Choose Europe for Science' event at La Sorbonne
Madeleine DrielsmaPress Adviser to the ERC PresidentT: +32 2 298 76 31
Marcin MońkoHead of Media and Content SectorT: +32 2 296 66 44
French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen attend the “Choose Europe for Science” event
to encourage researchers and scientists from all over the world to practice in Europe
French President Emmanuel Macron attends the “Choose Europe for Science” event
French President Emmanuel Macron welcomes European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen as she arrives at the “Choose Europe for Science” event
French President Emmanuel Macron delivers his speech at the “Choose Europe for Science” event
European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen delivers he speech at the “Choose Europe for Science” event
no one would have imagined that one of the biggest democracies in the world would cancel research programs under the pretext that the word diversity was in this program,” French President Emmanuel Macron said at the “Choose Europe for Science” event in Paris
“No one would have thought that one of the biggest democracies in the world would delete with a stroke the ability of one researcher or another to obtain visas,” Macron said
Taking the same stage at the Sorbonne University
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that the EU’s executive branch would set up a “super grant” program aimed at offering “a longer-term perspective to the very best” in the field
AP correspondent Karen Chammas reports the European Union has launched a drive to attract U.S
She said that 500 million euros ($566 million) will be put forward in 2025-2027 “to make Europe a magnet for researchers.” It would be injected into the European Research Council
which already has a budget of more than 16 billion euros ($18 billion) for 2021-2027
Von der Leyen said that the 27-nation EU intends “to enshrine freedom of scientific research into law” with a new legal act
Europe will not compromise on its principles,” she said
The White House responded by describing DEI as “an inherently discriminatory policy.”
“If the European Union wants to embrace policies that divide
rather than focus on real scientific discovery
innovation continues to outpace Europe,” said spokesperson Anna Kelly
“America will continue to attract and cultivate the best talent in science
Macron said that the French government would also soon make new proposals to beef up investment in science and research
More than 380 grant projects have been cut so far
including work to combat internet censorship in China and Iran and a project consulting with Indigenous communities to understand environmental changes in Alaska’s Arctic region
While not mentioning the Trump administration by name
von der Leyen said that it was “a gigantic miscalculation” to undermine free and open research
“We can all agree that science has no passport
“We believe that diversity is an asset of humanity and the lifeblood of science
It is one of the most valuable global assets and it must be protected.”
vowed that the EU would also address some of the roadblocks that scientists and researchers face
notably excessive red tape and access to businesses
Macron said that science and research must not “be based on the diktats of the few.”
Macron said that Europe “must become a refuge” for scientists and researchers
and he said to those who feel under threat elsewhere: “The message is simple
Associated Press writer Chris Megerian contributed from Washington
Top right-wing officials across Europe hailed George Simion’s victory in the first round of Romania’s presidential re-run on Sunday as a major boost for nationalist and euroskeptic forces within the EU
“Congratulations to George Simion, Vice President of ECR Party, on the excellent result in the first round of the presidential elections! Wishing you the best of luck in the second round!” said Mateusz Morawiecki
former Polish prime minister and current president of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group in the European Parliament
anti-establishment agenda that mirrors MAGA-style rhetoric
His victory on Sunday raises the prospect of Romania aligning with anti-Ukraine voices at the EU leaders’ table
“In Romania the people finally voted, freely, with their heads and hearts. With all due respect to the ‘gentlemen’ of Brussels and their dirty tricks. Bravo George Simion!” said Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini
“Congratulations to our ally George Simion who came out on top in the first round of the presidential election in Romania this evening, with more than 30 percent of the vote,” said Marion Maréchal, a senior official in France’s far-right Reconquête
as initial results were announced Sunday evening
Simion, founder of the hard-right Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR), won more than 40 percent of the vote Sunday, defeating his rivals by a wide margin. Centrist Bucharest Mayor Nicușor Dan came in second with just under 21 percent, narrowly edging out establishment candidate Crin Antonescu, who secured 20 percent.
Simion and Dan are set to face off in a runoff election on May 18.
“The European Union is concerned at the planned extension of the operation by Israeli forces in Gaza,” a Commission spokesperson says.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s efforts to end the conflict have proved fruitless so far.
An uptick in gang violence has seen more than a dozen shootings so far this year.
Russia has yet to prove it wants to end the war, prime minister says.
Tuesday
World Subscribers only In Zurich
the leaf blower war or the anti-'woke' backlash
World Subscribers only Germany's Friedrich Merz is embracing pragmatism
World Subscribers only Trump-Carney meeting: Canada seeks reconciliation
World Subscribers only Friedrich Merz bets on two private sector converts to revive the German economy and reform the state
World Subscribers only Founder of Sant'Egidio community fears next pope could undo Francis's legacy
Opinion Subscribers only 'Russian gas and Europe is an old story that ended badly
Economy Subscribers only Europe's steel industry flattened by crisis
World Subscribers only How European countries plan to fund defense efforts
France Subscribers only Macron announces citizens' convention on school schedules
France Subscribers only 21 charged over French prison attacks as investigation narrows in on drug traffickers
France Subscribers only French mosque stabber was driven by 'morbid fascination,' prosecutor says
France Subscribers only At the trial of Kim Kardashian's robbers
Videos World expos: From Paris 1855 to Osaka 2025
Videos How the Trump administration is attacking scientific research in the US
Videos Tesla cars set on fire in Las Vegas as calls to boycott Musk's company grow worldwide
Videos Can France's nuclear deterrent protect Europe
Opinion Subscribers only 'The American dream is dying'
Opinion Subscribers only John Bolton: 'The term chaos is commonly used to describe the top of the Defense Department'
Opinion Subscribers only 'It is pointless to imagine a significant wave of American academics leaving'
Magazine Subscribers only Tracking down the pianos taken from French Jews during the Nazi Occupation
Magazine Subscribers only Eve Rodsky
the American helping couples balance the mental load
Magazine Subscribers only Desecration or more glory
Joan Didion's private diaries are revealed
Magazine Subscribers only For Jewish cartoonist Joann Sfar
2025."> Pixels Subscribers only Golden Owl solution is revealed
but leaves players of 31-year hunt disappointed
Pixels Subscribers only Secrets of decades-long Golden Owl treasure hunt to be revealed
Lifestyle Inside Chanel's French leather workshops
Culture Subscribers only The marvelous bronzes of Angkor on display at the Musée Guimet in Paris
The 'Choose Europe for science' conference is taking place in Paris on Monday in an effort to offer an alternative to US researchers disenfranchised by Donald Trump's policies
French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen arrive to attend the "Choose Europe for Science" conference in the amphitheatre of the Sorbonne University in Paris
GONZALO FUENTES / AFP French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen took aim at Donald Trump's policies on science on Monday
as the EU seeks to encourage disgruntled US researchers to relocate to Europe
Von der Leyen told a gathering at Paris's Sorbonne university that the European Union will launch a new incentives package worth €500 million to make the bloc "a magnet for researchers."
"We have to offer the right incentives," she said
von der Leyen told the "Choose Europe for Science" conference that the role of science was being put in question "in today's world," and condemned such views as "a gigantic miscalculation."
Universities and research facilities in the United States have come under increasing political and financial pressure under Trump
including threats of massive federal funding cuts
"Nobody could have imagined that this great global democracy whose economic model depends so heavily on free science (...) was going to commit such an error," Macron said
"But here we are." He added: "We refuse a diktat consisting of any government being able to say you cannot research this or that." Macron said that the French government would also soon make new proposals to beef up investment in science and research
Macron added that Europe "must become a refuge" for scientists and researchers
and he said to those who feel under threat elsewhere: "The message is simple
tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired and foreign students fear possible deportation for their political views
The 27-nation EU hopes to offer an alternative for researchers
academics and ministers for research from EU member countries are taking part in Monday's conference
as are representatives from non-EU members Norway
researchers to "choose France." Last month he unveiled plans for a funding programme to help universities and other research bodies cover the cost of bringing foreign scientists to the country
Aix Marseille University in the south of France announced in March it would open its doors to US scientists threatened by cuts
It says its "Safe Place for Science" scheme has already received a flood of applicants
France's flagship scientific research center
launched another initiative aimed at attracting foreign researchers whose work is threatened
It is also seeking to tempt back French researchers working abroad
some of whom "don't want to live and raise their children in Trump's United States"
is the fact that while EU countries can offer competitive research infrastructure and a high quality of life
research funding and researchers' remuneration both lag far behind US levels
But CNRS's Petit said last week he hoped that the pay gap would seem less significant once the lower cost of education and health
and more generous social benefits were taken into account
Macron's office said France and the European Union were targeting researchers in a number of specific sectors
Lecture du Monde en cours sur un autre appareil
Vous pouvez lire Le Monde sur un seul appareil à la fois
Ce message s’affichera sur l’autre appareil
Parce qu’une autre personne (ou vous) est en train de lire Le Monde avec ce compte sur un autre appareil
Vous ne pouvez lire Le Monde que sur un seul appareil à la fois (ordinateur
En cliquant sur « Continuer à lire ici » et en vous assurant que vous êtes la seule personne à consulter Le Monde avec ce compte
Que se passera-t-il si vous continuez à lire ici
Ce dernier restera connecté avec ce compte
Vous pouvez vous connecter avec votre compte sur autant d’appareils que vous le souhaitez
mais en les utilisant à des moments différents
Nous vous conseillons de modifier votre mot de passe
Votre abonnement n’autorise pas la lecture de cet article
merci de contacter notre service commercial
PARIS ― European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Monday slammed U.S
President Donald Trump's campaign against American higher education as she unveiled a half-billion-euro plan to attract foreign researchers
“The role of science in today’s world is questioned
What a gigantic miscalculation,” von der Leyen said
Appearing alongside French President Emmanuel Macron at Paris' storied Sorbonne University on Monday
von der Leyen said the “Choose Europe for Science” initiative would put forward a €500 million program from 2025 to 2027 to attract foreign researchers to “help support the best and the brightest researchers and scientists from Europe and around the world.”
Macron said the country would commit another €100 million from the France 2030 program to woo researchers and make Europe a “safe haven” for science.
“There can be no lasting democracy without free and open science,” he said
Both French Minister of Higher Education Philippe Baptiste and Robert Proctor
a prominent professor of the history of science at Stanford
called what’s happening across the Atlantic a “reverse enlightenment.”
The head of the European executive did not name-check American researchers or Trump
She even framed her speech around the story of Marie Curie — the groundbreaking
Nobel Prize-winning scientist who fled Russian-occupied Poland for France.
“We must not downplay what is at stake today
No one could have imagined a few years ago that one of the world's largest democracies would abolish research programs on the grounds that there was the word diversity in their programs,” he said
“No one could have imagined that one of the world's greatest democracies could
strike out the possibility of obtaining a visa for a researcher.”
Von der Leyen also announced she would put forward a “European Innovation Act” and a “Startup and Scaleup Strategy” to cut red tape and boost access to venture capital to help turn innovative science into business opportunities
She pledged to legally codify the freedom of scientific research on the continent by proposing a “European Research Area Act.”
She added that she wants EU countries to spend 3 percent of their gross domestic product on research by 2030, though Brussels has been pushing member states to meet this figure for decades to no avail
Macron attempted a similar pitch during Trump’s first term after the U.S
president withdrew from the Paris climate agreement
but it’s not clear to what extent the “Make Our Planet Great Again” plan worked
Macron said Monday that the program allowed France to “welcome the best researchers” whose work on climate science was under threat.
opening a new front in the transatlantic trade war
German lawmaker Nils Schmid argues there is no need to open the subject as the U.S
has not said it would withdraw its nuclear umbrella
“Before aiming for a free trade deal with the U.S.
our first demand is that they withdraw their tariffs,” says French official
The transatlantic trade war is increasing pressure on France to back a trade deal with South America’s Mercosur bloc
Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information
Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information
2025 at 8:45 AM EDTBookmarkSaveTakeaways NEWFrench President Emmanuel Macron made a plea to US-based researchers who have been affected by Donald Trump’s policies to choose Europe
come and do research here,” Macron said Monday at the Sorbonne University in Paris as he attacked US decisions to shut down university programs
“No one could have thought that this great democracy
whose economic model relies so heavily on free science
and its ability over the past three decades to innovate more than the Europeans and to spread this innovation more widely
Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for serious discussion of American foreign policy and global affairs
The magazine has featured contributions from many leading international affairs experts
SOPHIA BESCH is Senior Fellow in the Europe Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and an Adjunct Lecturer at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies
RICHARD YOUNGS is Senior Fellow in the Democracy
and Governance Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Professor of International Relations at the University of Warwick
Sophia Besch and Richard Youngs
Both Russian aggression and the Trump administration’s political and economic antiliberalism are threatening the continent’s cohesion and stability
such as gathering more money for defense—through spending by individual countries and loans from the European Union—and forming smaller coalitions of states to bring together like-minded governments
These patches will help Europe muddle through immediate turmoil but will not solve the continent’s most fundamental political and security challenges
European governments must design a new regional order through which they can achieve a more secure Europe
The EU has struggled to implement much-needed reforms and is hobbled by growing differences among its member states
has relied on the United States to organize European security as the alliance’s first among equals
An effective security and defense policy depends on a shared sense of political community
which a successive string of crises—including the eurozone financial crisis
and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine—has depleted
Europeans must agree among themselves on exactly what they are defending and why
Solutions thus far do not reflect the depth and complexity of the adjustments required to safeguard the European order
and analysts who continue to insist that the continent can achieve greater unity only through deeper integration within the EU
European governments are trying to advance their defense and security interests quickly through ad hoc coalitions of the willing
in which small groups of states convene to address specific policy challenges—most recently
to discuss solutions for the conflict in Ukraine
Although these coalitions may get around the bloc’s lack of political cohesion and offer speed and flexibility to meet urgent challenges
and access to institutional budgets and integrated planning
European governments must instead embrace a different regional order
the continent will not be able to weather the geopolitical storms that have unsettled many of its long-standing strategic assumptions
including the notion that it will always enjoy the military backing of the United States
To ensure Europe’s long-term security and to address other pressing political challenges
European governments need to craft more fluid and flexible alliances
Instituting a new system parallel to the EU in which different clusters of European states can cooperate on select areas of policy would cut through many of the bloc’s current bureaucratic and ideological roadblocks and allow Europeans to form a new
more democratically accountable alliance that better protects Europe’s liberal order
Through many crises over the past two decades
EU member states have repeatedly promised to reform the bloc’s elaborate institutional structures and procedures
including those related to decision-making
Although all European governments believe the EU needs reform
Some member states benefit from the current setup more than others and thus resist a redistribution of power and resources
and most national governments are reluctant to fully cede their sovereignty
favor technocratic management over disruptive change; bureaucratic inertia and legal complexity block ambitious efforts
To get around the fact that the EU and NATO both struggle to respond to the kind of political disorder emanating from U.S
President Donald Trump’s second administration
European governments have been drawn to building coalitions of the willing
This strategy has its appeals: leaders get to pick and choose whom they want to consult on any specific issue and can bypass slow and bureaucratic institutional processes
A prominent recent example is the coalition focused on Ukraine
which began with small meetings of European leaders hosted by France and the United Kingdom in March 2025 to coordinate military aid
and postwar planning for Ukraine outside EU or NATO frameworks
This model is now often discussed as a silver bullet to circumvent Europe’s strategic paralysis
coalitions of the willing are best suited for politics
Narrow caucuses composed of countries that can mobilize significant political and economic resources often end up excluding small and medium-sized states
This is precisely what happened with the Ukraine grouping: after pushback from excluded states
the coalition was rapidly expanded to include 31 countries
it now includes several members that are either unwilling or unable to contribute significantly
which dilutes its effectiveness and illustrates how a mechanism designed for speed and cohesion can become just as unwieldy as the institutions it seeks to bypass
ad hoc coalitions are too flimsy to organize long-term policy discussions and are not able to manage the overlaps between different areas of policy—for example
between climate change and security—because they tend to address single issues in isolation
Coalitions also do not benefit from the kind of blocwide intelligence sharing or command-and-control structures that are necessary to coordinate multilateral military deployments
Nor do they have access to the institutional EU funding critical to financing core objectives
What on paper may look like a breakthrough—European governments setting up meetings quickly—is in reality another instance of muddling through problems arising from systemic deficiencies
Washington has not only supplied the bulk of the continent’s conventional and nuclear deterrent but also designed
the strategic security consensus around which European states have coalesced
government that is at best apathetic and at worst antagonistic and that appears set on unilaterally shifting the burden of the continent’s security onto its European allies
They have agreed to spend more money to build up European capabilities and ammunition stores
But a truly European defense requires strategic coherence on how to organize this effort: where
and to what ends this money should be spent
Recent objections from some member states to the EU’s ReArm proposals to boost defense spending—in particular to the initiative’s aggressive branding and focus on conventional military buildup over other priorities
such as border defense or cybersecurity—illustrate how a failure to find such common ground can undermine important progress
The way forward must have some roots in current institutions
NATO’s command-and-control structures and defense planning processes currently make up the backbone of Europe’s defense
and the EU’s defense-industrial policy levers
are essential to effectively organize European and Ukrainian rearmament
But these processes can take Europe only so far
NATO doesn’t function without the United States
and EU member states do not fully trust their institutions in Brussels or one another
neither organization is set up to satisfy the myriad needs of European security
must be based on shared political values and objectives
Neither EU nor NATO membership today suggests a state’s commitment to the basic notions of liberal order
The EU has debated the issue of its members not sharing the same foundational values for many years
and the cost of its nonresolution has now become damagingly high
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s actions
such as supporting Russian positions and styming cooperation with Ukraine
not only to democracy in Hungary but to core norms of Europe’s liberal order
The EU has in vain sought to persuade the Hungarian government to mend its ways
The emerging practice of EU leaders issuing statements on behalf of 26 states—the whole bloc excluding Hungary—is not a durable solution
The Slovakian government is moving in a direction similar to Hungary’s
More radical ways are needed to move such countries away from vitally important areas of cooperation
some non-EU and non-NATO members should be closer to the heart of the European order
would benefit from brokering a new political and security alliance to urgently bridge the rifts caused by Brexit
and economic support for Ukraine and imposing sanctions on Russia
A relatively modest EU-British security pact is currently in the works
A better way is also needed to formally include Ukraine within the European order
NATO membership is out of reach and EU accession is too slow
and bureaucratically burdensome to be of tangible help to Ukraine’s immediate security imperatives
Brussels has pledged to reform the accession process to make it quicker and more immediately beneficial but has yet to fulfill this promise
To ensure both strategic autonomy and inclusivity
Europe needs a reformed order centered on treaty-based cooperation among the continent’s liberal democracies
It should be built around an innovative institutional structure in which different clusters of states participate to varying degrees across all areas of policy
this model would be anchored by an institutional core
Each cluster would establish its own governance arrangements led by the governments of participating states and would be subject to oversight—by an appointed intergovernmental secretariat
or a parliamentary body composed of representatives from the cluster’s member states
Countries would join these clusters voluntarily—likely through agreements on certain areas of policy—allowing for some overlap in memberships to different clusters
Nordic and Mediterranean states with complementary energy profiles could unite in a climate cluster
Ukraine could cooperate fully with European states on foreign and security policies without having to wait for the result of formal EU accession talks
There is no need to abandon EU institutions
and processes that function well for certain policy areas
The body should continue to govern the continent’s tech
But the cluster model offers a way to break persistent deadlocks on other
by allowing groups of like-minded European states to cooperate more deeply without the constraint of needing EU-wide unanimity
Although the core clusters—especially the one focused on security—would require a firm commitment to liberal democratic values
the memberships of others could be broader
membership would not be static: governments could be suspended or expelled by the cluster if they violate foundational norms
And decisions made within a cluster would be binding only to the members of that cluster
The flexibility of this model can help the continent establish clear obligations and joint decision-making mechanisms
European security experts have been calling for this kind of integration for many years
policymakers have doubled down on protecting their own institutions rather than fashioning a much-needed new template for European order
The shock of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine led Europeans to launch a broad rearmament effort to defend the continent against military invasion
The shock of the Trump administration’s ideological attack against European values—expressed most vividly by Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference
in February—invites European governments to rethink the basic parameters of their regional order
It is a highly welcome development that European leaders seem to be stepping up to take over more responsibility
but this is not the same thing as comprehensively preparing Europe for a new
the “new European beginning” that these leaders have so confidently announced will likely prove to be another false dawn
Subscribe to Foreign Affairs to get unlimited access
Already a subscriber? Sign In
Liana Fix and Michael Kimmage
Barry R. Posen
Alexander Vindman
Alexander Gabuev, Alexandra Prokopenko, and Tatiana Stanovaya
Jack Watling
Tanisha M. Fazal
Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay
Tong Zhao
Zongyuan Zoe Liu
Anne Neuberger
* Note that when you provide your email address, the Foreign Affairs Privacy Policy and Terms of Use will apply to your newsletter subscription
Published by The Council on Foreign Relations
Privacy Policy Terms of Use
From the publishers of Foreign Affairs
This website uses cookies to improve your experience
You can opt-out of certain cookies using the cookie management page
* Note that when you provide your email address, the Foreign Affairs Privacy Policy and Terms of Use will apply to your newsletter subscription
Exclusive: British scientists ‘over the moon’ with re-entry to funding scheme after losing out for three years
British scientists are “over the moon” to be back in the EU’s flagship science research programme Horizon after a three-year Brexit lockout
with new data revealing they have been awarded about £500m in grants since re-entry
As the EU secretly draws up strategies for the next seven-year funding cycle in 2027
the UK is hoping its success in the first 12 months since returning to Horizon will leave it in pole position with Germany and France to dominate European science
With projects ranging from the research to develop brain catheters inspired by wasps to efforts to create aviation fuel from yeast and greenhouse gases
the UK has been catapulted to the top of the league of non-EU beneficiaries by number of grants
it looks set to resume its overall place in the coming 12 months
EU data shows nearly 3,000 grants were awarded to British science projects in 2024
the first year of the UK’s post-Brexit associate membership after a three-year pause caused by a Brexit row over Northern Ireland
“I am absolutely over the moon that we are back in the programme formally,” said Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena, a professor in medical robotics at Imperial College London
Taking stock after the first year back in the £80bn Horizon programme Prof Sir John Aston, the pro-vice-chancellor for research at the University of Cambridge
said he hoped the embargo “never happens again”
“It is really good that we are back inside the tent,” he said
adding that it showed the world the UK’s commitment to being a “science superpower” with world-class research
and [it shows] that people who get this funding are doing really impressive work.”
View image in fullscreenProf Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena (left) showed Maroš Šefčovič (right) and Nick Thomas-Symonds (centre) a prototype of the cranial catheter
Photograph: Cabinet OfficeRodriguez was among those to meet the European trade commissioner
on a visit to Imperial on Wednesday to underline the revived science collaboration with the EU
“Everyone is using that opportunity to start thinking with a European hat on about how to leverage these opportunities and reach out to colleagues in continental Europe and so on.”
His €11m (£9.4m) Eden2020 research to develop the cranial catheter was driven by an €8m grant for a consortium led by Imperial but involving a hospital and two universities in Italy along with universities in Germany and the Netherlands
The UK’s isolation was a “double whammy” to science
because he had stopped applying for funding and also collaboration with European partners had weakened
While “academia is porous” and the exchange of ideas had continued
there was “nothing like joint funding to cement a relationship”
Prof Carsten Welsch, the head of accelerator science at the University of Liverpool
was one of many who implored the government and the EU to allow the UK back into the Horizon programme
The pause cost him his leadership role in a prestigious Marie Curie network on novel plasma accelerators
the UK was back in the game and a lead participant in the new €10m project to help optimise plasma accelerator-based compact research infrastructures
“We have gone from maintaining presence to driving progress,” he said
The EU is developing its strategy for the next seven-year funding programme
“It’s all very secretive but it is in full swing and it is important that we position ourselves positively,” said Welsch
2,911 grants worth €574.7m were awarded to the UK
which had the highest number of beneficiaries of any of the 19 non-EU members in the programme and the third highest by value in just 12 months
The University of Oxford was the top beneficiary
and University College London and Imperial with about €28m
The Universities of Warwick and Edinburgh received more than €13m each while other organisations
were awarded smaller grants of about €275,000
Imperial College London’s 15-year cranial catheter project promises to provide a means of precision delivery of drugs
Photograph: Imperial College Eden2020 research projectFresh calls for funding for space and industry open at the end of May with virtual and augmented reality calls later this year
something Rodriguez is “eagerly” waiting for
The freeze saw UK-based scientists “bumped off” projects altogether
who is running eight active research programmes with EU grants
It would have been “catastrophic” if the UK had not been allowed back into the programme
“We wouldn’t have been able to start new collaborations
It would have been bad for post-doctorate developments
for training and for the exchange of students.”
Ledesma-Amaro’s eight grants centre on sustainable food research
including one project titled the “solar spoon”: this uses energy from the sun to generate hydrogen
which can then be processed using bacteria to generate proteins that can be used for food
Another centres on delaying “yeast death” to develop biotechnological processes around fermented food
while another is aimed at creating aviation fuel from yeast
Aston pointed to sustainable fuels research
aimed at converting solar energy and renewable electricity and greenhouse gases into sustainable fuels and chemicals
last month to show the spread of Horizon projects at Cambridge
which also include research into iridescent plant colours and information theory in AI
but these are the technologies that are going to solve some of the world’s big problems,” Aston said
Cambridge is one of the UK’s best-funded universities but
being intertwined again with European universities and private research outfits was vital
“We are incredibly fortunate to be in a university where we have amazing expertise across the university
but we certainly don’t have all expertise,” he said
President Trump’s administration to date has been blunt about its plans to assert US competitiveness and dominance
It has also not been afraid to subject itself and others to some bold dares under a volatile political agenda
Some are reconciling these high-level policy moves as causing a soon-to-be domino effect on the trillion-dollar digital economy
which is underpinned by data privacy commitments
The EU-US Data Privacy Framework (DPF) is one such transatlantic data privacy agreement
designed to streamline data flows across the Atlantic
from “mom-and-pop” to unicorn-sized
by allowing those entities that adhere to the framework to certify that they are meeting the data protection obligations on personal data transfers set forth by the European Commission and the US Department of Commerce
Given the sheer volume of companies participating in the DPF
of which 70% are classified as small-and-medium-sized
a transfer mechanism between the countries offers a competitive advantage
continuity and streamlined business operations
A bulk of both economies back digital data flows and a vast majority of the data flows are fueled by small or medium-sized businesses
If those businesses don’t have a low-cost and streamlined data transfer mechanism to depend on
This is not a future that is in either country’s best interest
recent actions by the new US administration have created uncertainty about the future of the DPF
and its adherence of US firms to the framework
still operating and a valid data transfer mechanism
are driving speculation that the US is shaking the tranquility of the transatlantic economic and trade relationships
the new Trump Administration has fired two Democratic Commissioners at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
the administrative agency that oversees and enforces consumer protection violations including the DPF principles
The FTC works with the EU to protect consumer privacy across jurisdictions
it creates a vacuum in the role of enforcement action on behalf of the FTC until the rest of the appointments are complete
President Trump terminated three Democratic members of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB)
an independent intelligence watchdog created in 2007 that provides the Executive branch with independence and oversight on national security interests
The PCLOB has been an integral part of the DPF, as it helps align the US signal intelligence practices to the EU legal standards by ensuring necessity and proportionality, which were challenges brought against the DPF’s predecessor, Privacy Shield
While mainstream focus remains on the US position on the DPF
it should not be forgotten that the ball remains in the EU’s court regarding the validity of the EU-US DPF
The European Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, and the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection, Michael McGrath, recently confirmed that DPF is a valid transfer mechanism
putting weight behind the continuity of the DPF
The Commissioner also recently met with newly appointed FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson
Based on the “one-year look back” that was published by the European Commission in cooperation with US authorities
there was clear data demonstrating the heightened structures
procedures and protections that are in place to back the DPF
The principles that back the EU-US DPF have been in place for decades
since the first Safe Harbor framework came into place in 2000
these frameworks had come under court challenges that required the US to strengthen its original framework to support an adequate level of privacy protection with the EU
the updates made from Privacy Shield to DPF left all seven principles (notice; choice; accountability for onward transfer; security; data integrity and purpose limitation; access; and recourse
enforcement and liability) perfectly intact
they focused on strengthening process-related elements (i.e.
adding a data protection review court to support a two-level redress mechanism for complaints)
Lessons learned from court challenges like the original Schrems case and Schrems II are that even with the invalidation of Safe Harbor and later Privacy Shield
many companies knew not to panic and leave
to remain in compliance with the principles even under uncertain times
The US Department of Commerce also continued in a status quo. At that time, BBB National Programs also continued to offer its services to provide transatlantic data transfer compliance and IRM accountability services
Because of the nature of independent accountability and its principles-based role
a framework to ensure they have a viable mechanism to transfer data – especially in uncertain times
Organizations may find it is better to wait things out and operate under their current commitments and compliance efforts
then course correcting if a new privacy framework comes into effect
After the DPF came into effect, more companies joined the DPF as compared to when it operated as Privacy Shield, up from 2400 companies to 2800
Perhaps the enforcement of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and an uptick in national privacy laws across global jurisdictions is prompting companies to fulfill fiduciary duty through privacy compliance to customers and key stakeholders
Regardless of the data transfer framework in place
organizations can and should continue to meet their business obligations with regard to transferring data overseas in a responsible manner
it is likely that the framework is not going away for good
will only be further strengthened through its next iteration
all while being tied to the same uniform foundational principles
as we all hold on to our hats and wait to see how the US will act next
we should know that the expectations to demonstrate robust data privacy commitments will remain the same to its core
especially if backed by accountable privacy practices – regardless of whether it is questioned in truth or dared to improve
LOS ANGELES, May 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz reminds investors that class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies
Investors have until the deadlines listed below to file a lead plaintiff motion
Investors suffering losses on their investments are encouraged to contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz to discuss their legal rights in these class actions at 310-914-5007 or by email to fcruz@frankcruzlaw.com
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE: ELF)Class Period: May 25
The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period
Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements
as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business
Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) contrary to its representations to investors
the Company was experiencing rising inventory levels as a consequence of flagging sales; (2) Elf falsely attributed the rising inventory levels to
changes in its sourcing practices; (3) to maintain investor confidence
and inventory over several quarters; (4) accordingly
the Company’s business and/or financial prospects were overstated; (5) all of the foregoing
would likely have a material negative impact on the Company; and (6) as a result
Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business
and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times
If you are an Elf shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate
Fluence Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNC)Class Period: October 28
Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Fluence’s relationship with its founders and largest sources of revenue
had accused the Company of engineering failures and fraud; (3) Fluence’s margins and revenue growth were inflated as Siemens and AES were moving to divest; and (4) as a result
If you are a Fluence shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate
enCore Energy Corp. (NASDAQ: EU)Class Period: March 28
Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that enCore lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting; (2) that enCore could not capitalize certain exploratory and development costs under GAAP; (3) that
its net losses had substantially increased; and (4) that
and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis
If you are an enCore shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate
TFI International Inc. (NYSE: TFII)Class Period: April 26
Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that the Company was losing small and medium business customers; (2) that
the Company’s TForce revenue was declining; (3) that TFI was experiencing difficulties managing its costs; (4) that
the profitability of its largest business segment was declining; and (5) that
If you are a TFI International shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate
Follow us for updates on Twitter: twitter.com/FRC_LAW
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules
Ursula von der Leyen during the "Choose Europe for Science" conference in Paris
2025 at 6:25 AM EDTBookmarkSaveThe European Union will propose a €500 million ($566.9 million) package to attract scientists to Europe
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Monday in Paris
“Science is an investment – and we need to offer the right incentives,” the president of the bloc’s executive said during a speech at the “Choose Europe for Science” event at the Sorbonne university attended by French President Emmanuel Macron
is meant to “make Europe a magnet for researchers.”
Macron and von der Leyen expected to announce protections for researchers seeking to relocate amid Trump’s crackdown
France and the EU are to step up their efforts to attract US-based scientists hit by Donald Trump’s crackdown on academia, as they prepare announcements on incentives for researchers to settle in Europe
The event, bringing together European academics and European commissioners, is the latest push to open Europe’s doors to US-based academics and researchers who fear their work is threatened by federal spending cuts for universities and research bodies, as well as the targeting of US higher education institutions over diversity policies.
France is thought to be particularly keen to attract scientists working on health – particularly infectious diseases – as well as climate research and artificial intelligence
wrote to the European Commission urging it to move fast to attract academic talent
France launched its own Choose France for science initiative in April with a dedicated platform for applications to host international researchers.
The French research ministry told Agence France-Presse: “Some foreign researchers have already arrived in France to familiarise themselves with the infrastructure, waiting for the funds and platform to be set up.”
In recent days, France’s flagship scientific research centre CNRS launched a new initiative to attract foreign workers whose research is threatened, as well as French researchers working abroad, some of whom “don’t want to live and raise their children in Trump’s United States”, its president, Antoine Petit, told AFP.
In France, Aix-Marseille University launched its “Safe place for science” programme in March. It will receive its first foreign researchers in June.
In a letter to French universities in March, Philippe Baptiste, France’s minister for higher education and research, wrote: “Many well-known researchers are already questioning their future in the United States. We would naturally wish to welcome a certain number of them.”
Challenges remain because research investment in the US – including private-public partnerships – has for many years been greater than in Europe. For decades, Europe has lagged behind the US on investment in universities and research centres.
French researchers have regularly raised the issue of the comparatively low salaries and precarious contracts for many researchers in France. On average, an academic researcher in the US is paid more than their French equivalent. Trade unions in France have called for better contracts, better salary provisions and better funding across the board at research institutions.
Some in France hoped the pay gap between scientists in France and the US would narrow, once the lower cost of education and health, and more generous social benefits in France were taken into account.
Germany’s incoming chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said last month: “The American government is currently using brute force against the universities in the US, so that researchers from America are now contacting Europe. This is a huge opportunity for us.”
Hawks Ursula Von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas tried to use an emergency bypass measure to fast-track part of a $900 billion plan. Luckily, it didn't work.
Amid questions of the over-militarization of U.S
foreign policy and the illusion of global primacy
the European Union is charging headlong in the opposite direction
appearing to be eagerly grasping for an American-esque primacist role
Not everybody in the EU is on board though. Countries like Hungary, Slovakia, Italy and Spain are known for their less than enthusiastic embrace of the rearmament fervor
a voice of dissent came from the European Parliament
elected directly by the EU citizens — unlike the Commission
As the foreign policy decisions are taken by consensus
the purpose of this maneuver is to eliminate potential vetoes from skeptical member countries
And Spain and Italy treat migration and failing states in the southern Mediterranean
Yet the Commission’s move represents a significant overreach
sidelining the Parliament and potentially some member states
the Commission seeks to fast-track SAFE without the scrutiny required for such a transformative shift
The Legal Committee’s rejection of that route highlights the Commission’s failure to justify this urgency or explain why alternative legal routes were ignored
currently the most popular party in France)
such as the foreign affairs and defense and security committees
have not so far addressed the issue with strategic clarity — such as asking questions about SAFE’s purpose
or why such a massive military buildup is necessary with such urgency
Even more worryingly, the EU’s militarization drive exacerbates the neglect of diplomacy. While the elites are indulging in these delusions, EU citizens seem to be much more skeptical about dramatic increase in defense spending
has neither the capability to sustain this path
like being buffered by two oceans and situated between unthreatening neighbors
A vote in the Legal Committee won’t address all these issues
allowing elected representatives and member states to scrutinize SAFE’s long-term ramifications
challenge the Commission’s fear-driven overreach
If the Commission persists in its power grab
by the European Parliament or member states
Today, there are only three global naval powers: the United States, China, and Russia
able occasionally to deploy further afield
If Donald Trump wants European states to look after their own collective security
Britain might be better off keeping its handful of ships in the Atlantic
although still able to inflict severe damage on Ukraine
few people talk about the real Russian naval capacity to challenge Western dominance
how this will increasingly come up against U.S
That is an incredible message to our adversaries
It is an incredible show of unity to our allies and our commitment to NATO.”
almost half of Britain’s fighting ships embarked from Portsmouth and Devonport to much fanfare
“the world’s most advanced air defense destroyer,” has been in the dry dock since 2017
I’ve just finished reading “The Royal and Russian Navies, Cooperation, Competition and Confrontation,”written by Britain’s former Naval Attache to Moscow
retired Principal Lecturer at the Defence Centre for Languages & Culture at the UK’s Defence Academy
The authors argue that while we have focused most of our attention on Russia’s army in Ukraine
And thinking about Russia as a relic of its Cold War self is a huge mistake
laboring under sanctions and the tight fiscal constraints of the war in Ukraine
Russia’s naval yards have built new vessels non-stop for the past decade
Russia has taken delivery of 27 submarines
Many more are under construction and will arrive by the end of this decade
The Royal Navy, on the other hand, has continued to shrink in the teeth of defense cuts, and each new efficiency drive makes it smaller. The two Albion-class landing vessels
and negotiations about their sale to Brazil are at an advanced stage
The increase in defense spending to 2.5% of GDP will mostly be swallowed by the MoD’s bloated procurement programs that are typically delayed and always over budget
It will not produce a rapid conveyor belt of ship-building that has seen Russia overtake Britain at a rapid pace since the Ukraine crisis started
The book also underlines the importance of dialogue as a key component of deterrence and reminds the reader of the significant naval cooperation that took place between the two navies after the Cold War
When HMS Battleaxe sailed into Baltiysk in 1992
the first Royal Navy ship visit to modern-day Russia
it discovered the remnants of the Soviet Navy
The Russian Navy had become the main beneficiary of Russia’s state armament program
and a Russian admiral was saying the UK’s decision to give up the Nimrod Maritime Patrol Aircraft in 2010 made his “life easier.”
practically all direct engagement between the Royal and Russian navies was cut at the instigation of the UK government
the UK and Russia have no serving military attachés in their respective embassies in London and Moscow for the first time since 1941
Our modern generation of seafarers are now only able to view Russians through binoculars
Britain has literally watched a modernizing Russian navy sail off into a distant horizon as we’ve criticized Russia from an ivory conning tower
From his ridiculous photo op on the deck of HMS The Prince of Wales, it’s not clear that Keir Starmer has understood that the world now contains just three global naval powers: the United States of America
Russian naval ambitions have now grown in the High North (Arctic) and in the Pacific
While Britain’s modest Carrier Strike Group steams east, Russia has already been active in joint naval exercises with China and Iran
as well as ship visits to Myanmar and other locations
Britain has practically no scope to control Russia’s increasingly assertive naval posture in Asia
This decade-long lack of engagement — not just by Britain but by America pre-Trump — has left us sailing blind on how Russian doctrine and tactics have shifted in the forge of war in Ukraine
It's clear to me that in this new world order of military burden sharing between America and Europe
Britain would be better placed keeping its handful of ships in the Atlantic
while America increasingly comes into contact with the Russian Navy in the Pacific
In President Donald Trump’s first 100 days
his administration has arrested and detained
visa holders and other non-citizens in the U.S
for speaking out against Israel’s military actions in Gaza
That’s not how the administration frames it
but that is the connective tissue in each of the cases
“We’re either a free society governed by the Constitution
Paul was specifically addressing the Antisemitism Awareness Act which would codify a Trump-era executive order declaring that antisemitism is a prohibited form of discrimination in schools and universities
and would use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism in assessing cases of antisemitic discrimination through the Department of Education
Critics say that it would allow the government to conflate criticism of Zionism and the Israeli government with antisemitism and serve as a dangerous tool to shut down free speech
Paul wondered aloud if campus police would be used in enforcing new speech rules
As The Jewish Chronicle reported after the vote was postponed
Paul was part of “a testy hearing on Wednesday that covered objections to the bill ranging from whether a Christian would be barred from saying that Jews killed Jesus
to the acceptability of making contemporary political allusions to Nazi Germany and even the comedy of Jerry Seinfeld and Joan Rivers.”
Paul cited the landmark 1969 Brandenburg v. Ohio case
in which Ku Klux Klan member Clarence Brandenburg was convicted under two Ohio laws of allegedly inciting violence against Jews and African-Americans with his speech
Brandenburg claimed that his punishment violated the First Amendment
“Brandenburg was a Nazi and an antisemite and he said horrible things,” Paul said
the Supreme Court ruled that you can say terrible things.”
The senator compared the American concept of free speech with Europe’s recent crackdowns on speech
“That’s unique about our country,” Paul said. “In Europe
if you call a boy who thinks he’s a girl a boy
If you say something about the Holocaust in Europe
Do we want to replicate Europe’s speech laws in the U.S.
“We’re codifying what Europe did to speech
The Congressional debate is taking place as non-citizen students have been snatched away ostensibly for what they said or wrote about Israel
the former co-president of Columbia University’s Palestinian Student Union
of using “threatening rhetoric and intimidation” against Jewish students during a protest on campus in 2024
A 34-year-old permanent resident of the U.S
who was born and raised in a Palestinian refugee camp in the West Bank before moving to the U.S
Mahdawi was detained by ICE agents while at his naturalization hearing in Vermont on April 14
He was never formally charged with a crime
We don't know if the other non-citizen students detained by immigration authorities in the last month have actually been involved in threats or intimidation
because the administration has been deliberately vague about its reasons for detaining them
Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the administration has the right to deport non-citizens when their "presence and activities in the United States would have serious adverse foreign policy consequences and would compromise a compelling U.S
He is invoking a little-used clause in the Immigration and Nationality Act
which stipulates that the Secretary of State can determine what kind of activity rises to the level of having “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences” for the country
Others are still in detention awaiting hearings
Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil claims he was arrested on March 8 for a speech he gave during campus protests, though he too was never charged with anything. A judge has said the administration’s attempt to deport him will be decided in court
He has been accused by Department of Homeland Security officials of spreading Hamas propaganda
something his family and supporters vehemently deny
the detainees’ support for the Palestinians’ plight and criticism of Israel’s war in Gaza appear to be the primary reasons behind their arrests
But if America did ignore the First Amendment and allowed rigid UK-style speech laws instead
Do the purveyors of the new antisemitism speech legislation on Capitol Hill know that this could boomerang on them when their ideological opponents someday get back into power
As journalist Glenn Greenwald observed about the antisemitism legislation
“this is not a hate speech code applying to foreign nationals
It's a hate speech code that applies to American citizens
where people can be punished for the expression of ideas on college campuses cheered for by the right wing faction that has long claimed there's nothing worse than hate speech codes and other forms of suppression of ideas on college campuses.”
Carving out one country in the world and making it forbidden to criticize its government is the complete antithesis of the Constitution’s protections and a betrayal of the American tradition
The First Amendment allows anyone on American soil to critique the U.S
but now condemning a foreign government could land you in jail or deported to another country
One would think that putting America first might include putting its First Amendment first
The U.S.-Ukraine minerals agreement is not a diplomatic breakthrough and will not end the war
but it is a significant success for Ukraine
both in the short term and — if it is ever in fact implemented — in the longer term
It reportedly does not get Ukraine the security “guarantees” that Kyiv has been asking for. It does not commit the U.S. to fight for Ukraine, or to back up a European “reassurance force” for Ukraine. And NATO membership remains off the table. Given its basic positions, there is no chance of the Trump administration shifting on these points
But since the Ukraine peace process appeared to run out of steam
and Trump threatened to “walk away” from the talks
Kyiv and Moscow have been engaged in an elaborate diplomatic dance of semi-proposals and hints to try to ensure that if Trump does walk away
he will blame the other side for the talks’ failure
This agreement makes it far more likely that he will blame Russia, and therefore that he will continue military and intelligence aid to Ukraine. He may also, as threatened, try to impose additional sanctions on Russia — though given the resistance of most of the world to these sanctions, and tensions over tariffs between the U.S. and Europe
it is not at all clear how effective new sanctions would be
military and intelligence aid will not win the war for Ukraine
nor allow it to drive the Russians from occupied territory
It will however help the Ukrainian army to slow down Russia’s advance on the ground and impose heavy casualties on the Russian army
This should not be taken by the Ukrainians or their European supporters as an excuse to maintain impossible conditions for peace that will make a settlement impossible; because the military and economic odds are still strongly against Ukraine
and a collapse of Ukraine’s exhausted troops is a real possibility
it will make it more likely that Russia will abandon or heavily qualify its impossible demands
for example for Ukrainian disarmament and withdrawal from additional territory
it is clearly far more favorable for Ukraine than Trump’s original — and grotesque — proposal that Ukraine should essentially hand its entire reserves of minerals to the U.S
the profits of mineral extraction will be equally shared
As Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said: “This agreement signals clearly to Russia that the Trump administration is committed to a peace process centered on a free
… President Trump envisioned this partnership between the American people and the Ukrainian people to show both sides’ commitment to lasting peace and prosperity in Ukraine
no state or person who financed or supplied the Russian war machine will be allowed to benefit from the reconstruction of Ukraine.”
money go to develop mineral extraction in the Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine
keep a lot of bad actors out of the country or certainly out of the area where we’re doing the digging."
absolute Western security guarantees for Ukraine after a peace settlement have never really been on offer
because the Biden administration and almost every other NATO government stated repeatedly that they would not fight to defend Ukraine
will however ensure a strong continued U.S
It greatly reduces the risk that in the event of future Russian aggression
would simply look away and not respond as it has in this war
with military supplies and extreme sanctions
But the deal won’t be implemented until the war comes to an end. Thereafter, it will depend on the willingness of U.S
private companies to invest in this sector — and that will depend on their assessment of both the risks and the profits involved
For it is vital to note that this agreement does not commit the U.S
government to invest in Ukraine; and to judge by the present profitability of minerals extraction in the world
it is not certain that private investors will see major benefits from doing so
China has developed its rare-earth sector on such a scale mainly through huge state-directed investment; and no-one has so far done a thorough analysis of the actual profitability and scale of most of these Ukrainian resources. So, only a tactical success for Ukraine and one over which there hang many questions; but nonetheless one that hopefully will lead Moscow to respond with some serious and acceptable peace proposals of its own.
About UsPrivacy PolicyPitchRS@quincyinst.org©2025 Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
©2025 Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters
Ireland's Data Protection Commission (DPC) on Friday fined popular video-sharing platform TikTok €530 million ($601 million) for infringing data protection regulations in the region by transferring European users' data to China
"TikTok infringed the GDPR regarding its transfers of EEA [European Economic Area] User Data to China and its transparency requirements," the DPC said in a statement
"The decision includes administrative fines totaling €530 million and an order requiring TikTok to bring its processing into compliance within 6 months."
requires the company to suspend data transfers to China within the time period
The penalty is the result of an investigation that was launched in September 2021 that probed the company's transfer of personal data to China and its compliance with stringent data protection laws regarding data transfers to third countries
DPC Deputy Commissioner Graham Doyle said TikTok's personal data transfers to China went against Article 46(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) because it failed to verify and guarantee that the personal data of EEA users was given equivalent privacy protections to that afforded within the bloc
Doyle further added that TikTok did not address concerns arising from potential access by Chinese authorities under anti-terrorism and counter-espionage laws in the country that were identified as "materially" diverging from European Union standards
The DPC also faulted TikTok for providing erroneous information during the inquiry to the effect that it did not store EEA users' data in Chinese servers
only to disclose to the watchdog last month that it identified an issue in its systems in February 2025
as a result of which limited EEA data had indeed been stored on servers in China
"Whilst TikTok has informed the DPC that the data has now been deleted
we are considering what further regulatory action may be warranted
Christine Grahn, TikTok's head of public policy and government relations for Europe, said the decision failed to take into account Project Clover
a data security initiative aimed at protecting European user data
and that the ruling does not reflect the current safeguards put in place
"The DPC itself recorded in its report what TikTok has consistently said: it has never received a request for European user data from the Chinese authorities, and has never provided European user data to them," Grahn said
This is the second fine levied by the DPC against the ByteDance-owned company. In September 2023, TikTok was handed a €345 million (then about $368 million) fine for violating GDPR laws in relation to its handling of children's data
and SOC security to respond quicker and stop breaches early
AI agents boost business—but create risks
and strategies from industry leaders – all for free
Marcel Ciolacu quits after coalition candidate fails to make it to run-off against nationalist George Simion
Romania’s pro-EU prime minister, Marcel Ciolacu, has resigned after his ruling coalition’s candidate crashed out of a presidential election rerun decisively won by a far-right Trump admirer
dramatically deepening the country’s political turmoil
“Rather than let the future president replace me
told reporters after a meeting at the headquarters of his Social Democratic party (PSD)
Ciolacu said the PSD would withdraw from the pro-western coalition – effectively ending it – while cabinet ministers will stay on in an interim capacity until a new majority can be negotiated after the presidential run-off on 18 May
Sunday’s first-round vote was convincingly won by ultranationalist George Simion, 38, who sports Maga caps, pushes a socially conservative agenda and has called for the “Melonisation” – referring to Italy’s far-right prime minister – of Europe
Simion’s score of 40.96% was almost double that of the second-placed finisher
The two will face each other in a runoff that raises the prospect of another disruptive nationalist joining the EU leaders’ club
The coalition candidate, Crin Antonescu, finished third in a bitter blow to the government, formed after December elections by the leftist PSD, the centrist Liberals and ethnic Hungarian UDMR to keep the EU and Nato member on a pro-western track
Simion’s Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR) and two other sovereignist parties won more than a third of parliamentary seats
and forming a new majority without the far-right bloc will be hard – even more so if Simion is elected president
A Simion victory – and a likely change of government – could lead to Romania, which shares a border with Ukraine
veering away from the mainstream and becoming another disruptive force within the EU alongside Hungary and Slovakia
It would also be welcomed by conservative nationalists in Europe and beyond – including senior Trump administration figures such as the US vice-president
JD Vance – who accused Bucharest of denying democracy after the original ballot was cancelled
“The problem now isn’t that Romania is in a hard place
should George Simion win,” said the political scientist Cristian Pîrvulescu
“The anti-European group within the EU will become more substantial.”
View image in fullscreenGeorge Simion
socially conservative agenda and has called for the ‘Melonisation’ of Europe
Photograph: Action Press/Rex/ShutterstockThe French far-right leader Marine Le Pen said Romania’s voters had sent “a very nice boomerang” to the European Commission president
echoing claims Brussels was behind the cancellation of the original vote last year
Simion said after the result that his win was “not just an electoral victory
It is the victory of those who have not lost hope
The far-right candidate added: “I am here to serve Romanians
He said he believed in an EU “that thrives as a nest for its diverse and sovereign nations – not as a rigid system enforcing one-size-fits-all policies”
whose AUR has grown from an anti-vax movement into the country’s second-largest party
finished first in 36 of 47 electoral districts and secured 61% of the large overseas vote
a 55-year-old mathematician who founded the Save Romania Union party (USR) and campaigned as a pro-EU
called the runoff a battle “to convince Romanians that Romania needs its pro-western direction”
He said the two weeks leading up to the runoff would be “difficult against this isolationist candidate … It will not be a debate between individuals
it will be a debate between a pro-western direction for Romania and an anti-western direction”
View image in fullscreenExperts say Nicuşor Dan may struggle to beat George Simion in the run-off vote
Photograph: Mihai Barbu/AFP/Getty ImagesExperts have said Dan may struggle to beat Simion in the runoff because of disagreements between the independent candidate and the mainstream PSD and Liberal parties that could easily deter their voters from switching allegiance
Romania’s president has a semi-executive role with considerable powers over foreign policy
defence spending and judicial appointments
They also represent the country on the international stage and can veto important EU votes
Simion promised on Sunday to make Georgescu prime minister
early elections or forming a new government coalition
Simion denies his policies are far-right but has described his party as “natural allies” of Trump and promised an alliance of EU countries “in the spirit of Maga”
but consistently opposed military aid to Ukraine
2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A class-action lawsuit has been filed against enCore Energy Corp
a uranium exploration and development company
alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
represents investors who purchased enCore securities between March 28
Hagens Berman is investigating the claims and urges investors who purchased enCore Energy shares and suffered substantial losses to submit your losses now
The firm also encourages persons with knowledge that may assist the firm’s investigation to contact its attorneys
The complaint accuses enCore Energy and certain executives of issuing misleading statements and failing to disclose critical financial weaknesses during the class period
it alleges that the company lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting and could not capitalize certain exploratory and development costs under U.S
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
These issues reportedly led to a substantial increase in net losses
enCore disclosed its fiscal 2024 financial results
revealing a net loss of $61.3 million—more than double the $25.6 million loss reported in the previous fiscal year
The company attributed this increase to its inability to capitalize certain costs under GAAP
which would have been permissible under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
enCore acknowledged identifying a "material weakness" in its internal controls over financial reporting in 2024
citing deficiencies in risk assessment and monitoring processes
The financial turmoil coincided with a leadership shake-up at the company
enCore announced that Paul Goranson had stepped down as CEO and board member
was appointed Acting Chief Executive Officer by the board of directors
enCore's stock price plummeted by more than 46%
The lawsuit seeks damages for investors who suffered losses during the class period as a result of Defendants’ alleged wrongdoing
An investigation has been launched by prominent investor rights firm Hagens Berman into the company’s financial reporting practices
a partner at Hagens Berman leading the investigation
commented on the allegations: “Investors rely on accurate financial reporting to make informed decisions
enCore’s alleged failure to disclose material weaknesses in its internal controls and the impact of improper cost capitalization raises serious questions about whether shareholders were misled about the company’s financial health.”
If you invested in enCore and have substantial losses, or have knowledge that may assist the firm’s investigation, submit your losses now »
Latest data show dwindling river flows and worsening drought: these conditions are triggered by warmer-than-average weather and lower precipitation across much of the continent since the beginning of the year, according to the Drought in Europe – April 2025 report
With forecasts up to June showing drier-than-average conditions in northern and western Europe
there are growing concerns about the impact on agriculture river transport
Driven by a lack of rainfall and above-average temperatures
Similar conditions are emerging in north-western Europe
This analysis by JRC scientists also points out that large parts of the Mediterranean and the Middle East remain under warning and alert drought conditions
western and central France experienced a rainy winter
with northern Italy having a wetter start of the spring
affected vegetation and damaged infrastructures
Copernicus emergency maps were sent to first responders and regional authorities to help them manage the crises
most of Europe experienced warmer-than-average conditions
and northern Scandinavia mean temperatures were more than 3°C above normal
Scarce rainfall and intense heat dried out the land
leaving soils in the eastern Mediterranean and northern Africa significantly depleted of moisture
Drought effects became more evident across European rivers by early April
Large areas in northern Europe and parts of the western Alps are currently the most affected regions
Eastern Mediterranean countries and western Russia are also showing signs of hydrological stress
It is worth to highlight how in just a few weeks the conditions along the Rhine River changed significantly
with water levels dropping sharply in early April
reduced discharge is already impacting river navigation in the Middle Rhine
and much of the UK and Ireland recorded very dry conditions in March
Similar patterns were seen in southern Ukraine and central-to-eastern Türkiye
Compounded with dry conditions in the previous months
these trends raise concerns on how the situation may evolve later in spring and summer
While vegetation across most of Europe appeared healthy by the end of March
stress signs are already visible in parts of northern Africa
Early plant development may be masking vulnerabilities that could surface if drought conditions persist into the growing season
Forecasts from April to June 2025 point to drier-than-average conditions in northern and western Europe
Wetter than average conditions are expected over the Iberian Peninsula
There is however some uncertainty in the forecast due to the variability of different modelling systems used
Rivers are likely to remain unusually low across eastern Europe through May
Across many areas low river flow is already affecting farming
The Drought in Europe – April 2025 is based on the latest analysis from the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) and uses data from the European and Global Drought Observatories, components of the Copernicus Emergency Management Service
The information is complemented with data from other climate and drought monitoring tools
Drought in Europe– April 2025
Current drought situation in Europe
Faster progress needed to protect waters and better manage flood risks
World Drought Atlas
'#' : location.hash;window._cf_chl_opt.cOgUQuery = location.search === '' && location.href.slice(0
location.href.length - window._cf_chl_opt.cOgUHash.length).indexOf('?') !== -1
'?' : location.search;if (window.history && window.history.replaceState) {var ogU = location.pathname + window._cf_chl_opt.cOgUQuery + window._cf_chl_opt.cOgUHash;history.replaceState(null
"\/liveblog_entry\/eu-calls-for-utmost-restraint-after-israel-approves-plans-to-widen-gaza-offensive\/?__cf_chl_rt_tk=HQgmEDP0T0La29rLxzgp3u4JSjmwv7crmCcbkI_Bgg4-1746521381-1.0.1.1-L1vser.lohC6GCrtRx4BcNUnyiY1M2.DGDKHpqWbhgw" + window._cf_chl_opt.cOgUHash);cpo.onload = function() {history.replaceState(null
ogU);}}document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(cpo);}());