Please enable JS and disable any ad blocker
Ambassador Jamieson Greer issued the following statement in support of President Donald J
Trump invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose responsive tariffs to address the national emergency driven by the absence of reciprocity in our bilateral trade relationships
President Trump is taking urgent action to protect the national security and economy of the United States
has weakened our economic and national security
President Trump has prioritized swift action to bring reciprocity to our trade relations and reduce the trade deficit by leveling the playing field for American workers and manufacturers
and ensuring our defense-industrial base is not dependent on foreign adversaries—all leading to stronger economic and national security.”
To see the White House Fact Sheet on this action, click here
Trade Representative Jamieson Greer testifies before the Senate Finance Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s top trade negotiator came under fire Tuesday from senators unnerved by the president’s sweeping global tariffs
a market meltdown and the heightened risk of recession from an upended global trading order
“It seems like we’ve decided to begin a trade war on all fronts,″ said Republican Sen
He said he wanted to know who in the Trump administration he should hold responsible — and “choke″ — if the tariffs fail and Americans suffer from higher prices and slower economic growth
are getting jittery about Trump’s trade wars
especially since stocks collapsed after he announced broad tariffs last Wednesday
The market rebounded Tuesday on hopes that negotiations will convince the president to lower or suspend the tariffs
the biggest of which are set to take effect at midnight Wednesday
Several senators demanded that Greer explain what the administration was seeking to accomplish
Trump has said the tariffs were meant to raise money for the Treasury
bring manufacturing back to the United States
protect domestic industries and get other countries to make concessions
the White House has been all over the map when it comes to these tariffs
There is no clear message about how they were determined
whether they’re a negotiating tool or a move to try and cut the United States off from global trade and usher in a new era of 1870s-style protectionism.’’
said he would oppose the tariffs if they are intended only to raise revenue for the federal government
and not to open foreign markets to American exports
The Constitution gives Congress authority to set taxes
But lawmakers have gradually ceded that authority to the White House
Trump has been especially aggressive about using the powers of the presidency to impose his trade agenda
He claimed emergency authority to impose his massive tariffs last Wednesday
He earlier used the same powers to hit Chinese
Now lawmakers — including some Republicans — are suggesting that Congress needs to reassert its authority over trade
chaotic tariff spree has proven beyond a doubt that Congress has given far too much of its constitutional power over international trade to the executive branch,” Wyden said
Maria Cantwell of Washington last week introduced legislation that would require presidents to justify new tariffs to Congress
Lawmakers would then have 60 days to approve the tariffs
Senate Majority Leader John Thune showed no sign that he would allow a vote on a bipartisan bill that would exert congressional oversight of Trump’s tariffs
“I don’t think that has a future,” Thune said of a bill from Grassley and Cantwell
AP Writer Lisa Mascaro contributed to this report
This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks
The action you just performed triggered the security solution
There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase
You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked
Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page
Many were surprised Wednesday by Donald Trump’s decision to put a 90-day pause on a majority of his sweeping tariffs on other countries (with the exception of China)
but only one person was in the midst of defending those very tariffs to Congress
Trade Representative Jamieson Greer sat before the House Ways and Means Committee
where he’d been testifying for nearly four hours in defense of Trump’s “reciprocal tariff” policy
Democratic Representative Steven Horsford was the first to question Greer about the pause
and asked when exactly he had been made aware that Trump planned to walk back his sweeping tariffs
“I understood the decision was made a few minutes ago,” Greer said
“So did you know that this was ‘under discussion,’ and why did you not include this in your opening remarks?” Horsford said
Greer said he wouldn’t “divulge the contents” of his discussions with the president
but the trade representative couldn’t provide any information on the 90-day deadline
saying he didn’t know all the details because he’d been in the hearing all day
“So the trade representative hasn’t spoken to the president of the United States about a global reordering of trade
And yet he’s—but yet he announced it on a tweet!” Horsford said above Greer’s protests
“The president of the United States is in charge,” Greer replied
It looks like your boss just pulled out the rug from under you and paused the tariff—the taxes on the American people,” Horsford said
The Nevada Democrat continued to press Greer on his failure to disclose Trump’s plan at any point during the lengthy hearing
“If you came here knowing that these tariffs were going to be turned off
why didn’t you include that in your opening statement
why didn’t you reference that as part of your testimony?”
Greer repeated that he wouldn’t discuss his conversations with the president
These are real consequences for the American people and small businesses,” Horsford said
What does this even mean for your negotiating strategy
How are you in charge of negotiation if the president is tweeting about this
When Horsford asked Greer directly if he knew it was happening
Greer would only repeat that they’d been “discussing it.”
The president chose to take actions that he didn’t have the authority to take
He has put our economy in near collapse,” Horsford said
He then asked Greer about the issue on everyone’s mind. Earlier Wednesday, amid a roiling stock market, Trump had advised his followers on Truth Social that it was a “great time to buy.” After announcing the 90-day pause on tariffs
“Is this market manipulation?” Horsford asked
how is this not market manipulation?” Horsford asked
because it sure is not a strategy!” Horsford said
“We’re trying to reset the global trade system—” Greer said
But to enact enormous harm on the American people
which was our concern from the very beginning!” Horsford said
Horsford noted that all the Republican members of the committee had left “because they don’t want to defend this!”
On X, Horsford posted a picture of Greer conferring with his colleague
captioning it: “What it looks like when you’re the country’s trade representative testifying before Congress and you find out Trump changed his mind on tariffs.”
There is no strategy and it’s obvious this is amateur hour,” Horsford wrote
The Trump administration is now going to screen immigrants’ social media as grounds for denying immigration benefits
including international students and people applying for permanent residency
The Department of Homeland Security announced the move in a press release Wednesday afternoon
Citizenship and Immigration Services would be taking action
against “antisemitic activity on social media and the physical harassment of Jewish individuals.”
“DHS will enforce all relevant immigration laws to the maximum degree
to protect the homeland from extremists and terrorist aliens
including those who support antisemitic terrorism
violent antisemitic ideologies and antisemitic terrorist organizations such as Hamas
or Ansar Allah aka: ‘the Houthis,’” the statement read
the government made no indication that it has followed due process
and the two are not alone: Secretary of State Marco Rubio claims to have revoked the visas of over 300 students before Wednesday’s announcement
Now DHS will begin policing the opinions of anyone seeking to study in the United States
ostensibly on grounds of opposing “antisemitic terrorism.” In reality
or many other targeted students engaged in terrorism
the Trump administration has redefined terrorism to mean opposition to Israel’s brutal war in Gaza and support for Palestinian self-determination
the message is that immigrants and visitors to the U.S
Trump may have accidentally confessed to insider trading and market manipulation on Truth Social.
“THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT,” the president wrote on Wednesday, a mere four hours before announcing a 90-day pause on most retaliatory tariffs except for China
yet another market-shocking announcement that caused stocks to shoot up.
This is when an exclusive group of people with private knowledge do whatever they can to drive stock prices down—like announcing debilitating global tariffs—and then buy stocks up strategically before the price goes up again
the corruption is completely out in the open.
“Trump is creating giant market fluctuations with his on-again, off-again tariffs. These constant gyrations in policy provide dangerous opportunities for insider trading,” Senator Adam Schiff wrote on X
“Who in the administration knew about Trump’s latest tariff flip flop ahead of time
I’m writing to the White House—the public has a right to know.”
“Trump’s Truth Social now basically promotes veiled insider trading on upcoming announcements,” wrote health and economics expert Eric Feigl-Ding
“Trump’s benefactors are gleefully watching.”
The New York Times’ Andrew Ross Sorkin called it two days ago on CNBC
it would not shock me—and I hate to speculate—if we were to find out that a whole bunch of people who work in Washington as our elected leaders … ultimately sold stocks last week
The Trump administration—after crashing the global stock market and eroding U.S
legitimacy—is attempting to spin this as a win.
“Many of you in the media clearly missed The Art of the Deal,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said
* This article originally misstated Sorkin’s first name
Donald Trump is once again the laughingstock of the internet after his shocking decision Wednesday to issue a 90-day pause on some of his sweeping tariffs—with the exception of China—after the White House insisted for days that the president had no intention to hit the brakes.
“Many of you in the media clearly missed The Art of the Deal,” said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt
as she tried to spin Trump’s sudden reversal as part of a long-unfolding plan to either boost domestic manufacturing or something else entirely—actually
Online people were quick to make what have now become running jokes about Trump’s so-called “art,” and the Trump administration’s mind-boggling insistence that his tariffs are at once a brilliant negotiation tactic and a legitimate policy meant to bolster the U.S
“Oh my god she did the meme,” wrote Tahra Jirari
the director of economic analysis at the Chamber of Progress
“The Art of the Deal is panicking and reversing course less than 24 hours after tariffs go into effect?” wrote Aaron Reichlin-Melchick
a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council
Pod Save America host Jon Favreau also took aim at Trump’s deal-making prowess
“Art of the Deal: 1) Impose massive tariffs on nearly every country that crash the markets and create the conditions for global economic collapse 2) Make zero deals with zero countries 3) Pause tariffs 4) VICTORY!!”
While Trump bragged about the scores of foreign leaders who’d come to kiss the ring, many foreign officials said that they’d received no reply to their requests to make a deal with the Trump administration, according to Politico.
knowing he was about to rescind his tariffs
But Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz pointed out that there was likely no method to Trump’s madness at all.
“OUR PLAN IS WORKING PERFECTLY AND IS JUST A NEGOTIATING TACTIC BUT IT IS ALSO GOING TO BE PERMANENT AND WE WILL BE THE WORLD LEADER IN TEXTILES AND NOW THERE IS A PAUSE AND EVERYONE NEEDS TO CHILL BUT ALSO WE WILL NEVER BACK DOWN AAAAAAHHHHHH,” Schatz wrote in a hilariously candid post on X
Donald Trump’s reversal on tariffs Wednesday afternoon seems to have caught his administration off guard
The president announced on Truth Social that tariffs would return to a baseline 10 percent level in most countries, while staggering 125 percent duties would be imposed on China. But his own officials couldn’t explain why. When a reporter asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent if he could
President Trump created maximum leverage for himself,” Bessent said
overwhelmed by the response mostly from our allies who want to come and negotiate in good faith.”
REPORTER: Can you explain more of the decision making on what feels like a reversal here?BESSENT: No pic.twitter.com/PUCIY0QZkq
Press secretary Karoline Leavitt, as usual, took a combative approach, telling reporters
“Many of you in the media clearly missed The Art of the Deal
you clearly failed to see what President Trump is doing here.”
Karoline Leavitt: "Many of you in the media clearly missed The Art of the Deal."(They're panicking because they have no idea what they're doing.) pic.twitter.com/0sJxefmg2f
showing weakening confidence in the American economy
But Trump’s own sycophants aren’t going to admit that the president would ever back off
As Donald Trump’s tariff plan slams the stock market
investors are beginning to wonder if the president doesn’t have some broader economic agenda—but rather if he’s just mentally ill
“In the last few days, we have had many conversations with macro fund managers,” wrote Tom Lee, the head of research at the financial analysis firm FSInsights
“And their concern is that the White House is not acting rationally
And some even fear that this may not even be ideology,” Lee continued
“A few have quietly wondered if the President might be insane.”
Lee placed the blame for any economic fallout squarely in Trump’s lap
arguing that Trump’s decisions behind the Resolute Desk lead to a “binary outcome,” though they don’t always make sense
“Multiple officials have stated they do not want nor expect a recession
And there are enough economy-savvy advisors that they are aware of this
the two-to-three percent fiscal stimulus needed to reverse a recession would negate any promised cuts to government spending,” Lee wrote
underscoring that “this is a rational view
Trump’s reciprocal tariffs and unexpected tariff reversals gave the market whiplash on Wednesday. China and the U.S. volleyed for most of the day, with Trump eventually claiming that he would spike levies on the nation, one of America’s biggest trading partners, to 125 percent after China revealed its own reciprocal tariff rate at 84 percent on U.S
the White House announced that it would be instituting a pause on the majority of its tariffs (except on China)
lowering the tariffs to a universal baseline rate of 10 percent
with the S&P 500 spiking by 7 percent in a matter of minutes
Lee’s assessment—which was published early Wednesday
before the swing—argued that prolonged stock fluctuations would lead to “tightening financial conditions.”
the greater the risk the US and the world are getting pushed into a needless recession,” he warned
Other financial experts, including JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Diamond, have similarly assessed that Trump’s plan has pushed the U.S. to the brink of a recession
Donald Trump has placed a 90-day pause on most of his reciprocal tariffs
despite repeatedly insisting that no such pause would take place.
Trump refused to stop his trade war with China
declaring in the same announcement that tariffs on the country would rise even more
“Based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the World’s Markets
I am hereby raising the Tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125%
China will realize that the days of ripping off the U.S.A.
is no longer sustainable or acceptable,” Trump wrote in the same Truth Social post
While the 10 percent tariffs on remaining countries is a significant reduction
Trump’s decision to renege on his aggressive “Liberation Day” tariffs was almost immediately met with allegations of caving at best and market manipulation at worst.
“Wow. Trump just caved on the sweeping across-the-board tariffs, issuing a 90-day pause,” wrote Democratic strategist Sawyer Hackett
trillions of dollars evaporated—for nothing at all.”
how is this not market manipulation?
“It’s not market manipulation,” Greer insisted again.
there aren’t even any Republicans left in this hearing.”
Lawyers for a man mistakenly deported to El Salvador slammed the Department of Justice for trying to claim that the foreign country could have its own reasons for keeping him in prison
alleging that El Salvador’s government “may have its own compelling reasons to detain” Abrego Garcia
and “has its own legal rationales for detaining members of … foreign terrorist groups like MS-13”—which the U.S
government has yet to actually demonstrate that Abrego Garcia is
But, in an eight-page filing Wednesday
lawyers for Abrego Garcia shot down the DOJ’s attempt to “ominously” introduce a flimsy excuse for leaving him there
“These vague speculations are forfeited because they were never previously asserted and
devoid of factual support,” the lawyers wrote
“There is no actual evidence that any nation has a criminal charge against Abrego Garcia
The only evidence is that he has never been charged or convicted of a crime in any country
Abrego Garcia has not even lived in El Salvador since 2011—some 14 years ago—when he was 16 years old
rendering the Government’s claim implausible,” the lawyers wrote
“If the Government has evidence as to Abrego Garcia
“The Government’s retreat to innuendo cannot bear the weight of the extraordinary relief it seeks: to perpetuate an unlawful incarceration that the United States itself engineered,” the lawyers added
the White House has fractured some of the country’s longest-standing global alliances
and foreign nations are marking the end of American economic dominance
But speaking at the National Republican Congressional Committee dinner on Tuesday night
Donald Trump was apparently more interested in using the intraparty platform to slander and roast his first-term enemies than address or assuage concerns over America’s debilitating problems
The end result was a hodgepodge of some of Trump’s greatest hits
begging the question if Trump is attempting to redirect conservative attention toward the rhetoric that got his base jazzed to support him in the first place
The subjects of his insults included President Joe Biden
and several liberal lawmakers who’ve dared to speak out against the president’s agenda
Imploring Republicans to recenter their focus on winning their respective midterm elections
Trump warned that Democrats would “try to reverse all of the progress that we’ve made” should they retake the House in 2026
“The House will be run by the same band of radicals and lunatics,” Trump said, shouting out House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Pelosi, and “weird” Al Green, the last of whom offered the only disruptive protest during Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress last month
“He’s a weird dude,” the president continued
“He should have been treated very badly for the way he behaved that night.”
Trump also took time away from his speech to ask the crowd if they’d rather he refer to Biden as “Crooked Joe” or “Sleepy Joe.” After equally muted applause for both options
Trump also devoted some of the night to speaking about California Senator Adam Schiff
whom Trump has previously referred to as the “enemy from within” for serving as the lead prosecutor in the first impeachment trial against him
“Adam Schifty Schiff—can you believe this guy? He’s got the smallest neck I’ve ever seen,” the president said
“I’d say how can that big fat face stand on a neck that looked like this finger
nobody can understand it,” Trump continued
deriding Schiff as one of the “most dishonest human beings” he’d ever seen
“How we can allow people like that to run in office is a shame,” the orange-coded convicted felon added
He was in charge of the fake witch hunt with Russia
The lawyers tasked with defending the Trump administration at the Supreme Court are fleeing in droves
The Washington Post reports that half of the attorneys in the Office of the Solicitor General in the Department of Justice are either leaving their jobs or preparing to do so
for reasons including disagreements with directives handed down from the White House
Now at least eight of the office’s 16-member staff are leaving
whom the government mistakenly deported to El Salvador
“He was put on administrative leave by Todd Blanche on Saturday
I issued a memo that you are to vigorously advocate on behalf of the United States,” Bondi told Fox News on Sunday
“Our client in this matter was Homeland Security—is Homeland Security
Such actions have alienated some members of the solicitor general’s office
its hires have come from politically diverse backgrounds to broaden legal perspectives
who is left?” Georgetown University law professor Steve Vladeck said to the Post
“Who is going to argue against positions that might be good for team Trump but are inconsistent with the standards of the office—and potentially the long-term interests of the government?”
Trade Representative Jamieson Greer welcomed Vice President Vance and Prime Minister Modi’s statement reaffirming the importance of the India-U.S
COMPACT (Catalyzing Opportunities for Military Partnership
Accelerated Commerce & Technology) initiative and highlighting the progress in the negotiations for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA)
launched by President Trump and Prime Minister Modi in Washington on February 13
“I am pleased to confirm that USTR and India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry have finalized the Terms of Reference to lay down a roadmap for the negotiations on reciprocal trade,” said Ambassador Greer
“There is a serious lack of reciprocity in the trade relationship with India
These ongoing talks will help achieve balance and reciprocity by opening new markets for American goods and addressing unfair practices that harm American workers
India’s constructive engagement so far has been welcomed and I look forward to creating new opportunities for workers
To read the USTR Fact Sheet on trade negotiations with India, please click here
Leadership Greer Class 45
will celebrate the launch of its Healthy Kids program as part of its class project during a special ceremony May 4 at 1 p.m
The Healthy Kids program promotes healthy eating and active lifestyles among children by improving access to fresh
the first 50 children who visit the market will receive a $5 voucher
Healthy Kids empowers children to make choices that support personal and community wellness by making nutritious food both exciting and accessible
Greer Farmers Market runs from 11 a.m
every Sunday from May through August at Greer City Park
Input your search keywords and press Enter
the redevelopment of County Square is one of the biggest — and the most important — developments in Greenville’s recent history
when you have a small piece of land and it doesn’t work out as intended
there’s a lot more at stake,” said Nancy Whitworth
the City of Greenville’s deputy city manager
“With this site and its sensitivity to the park and downtown
The county-owned property is more than 37 acres
equivalent in size to downtown Greenville’s core
and located within walking distance of Falls Park
and the Greenville Health System Swamp Rabbit Trail
Its redevelopment is expected to be a billion-dollar
the redevelopment of a block of South Main Street across from the Peace Center
the mixed-use development at the corner of North Main and Washington streets
the master planned urban community on Verdae Boulevard and Laurens Road on land once owned by the late reclusive textile magnate John D
at 1,100 acres and $1.5 billion when completed
and we’ve got to make sure to get it right,” said Greenville County Council Chairman Butch Kirven
County Square was not thought of as a part of Greenville’s downtown
But Falls Park opened in 2004 and Fluor Field two years later
planning started for the Swamp Rabbit Trail
a 22-mile multiuse trail that opened in 2009
Because the former mall that now houses county operations will be torn down
the developer and the county have a wonderful opportunity to design from the ground up
professor emeritus of city and regional planning at Clemson University and former member of the city’s planning commission and Design Review Board
“They have the opportunity to be creative and efficient
and make it an important part of Greenville
“Any time you double or triple the density of activities
it’s going to strain existing capacities,” he said
“They’ll have to have other ways to get there so you don’t have to get in a car
They’ll need to think carefully about the back streets
They need to make it attractive and feasible to walk with site lines and well-defined walking routes.”
who said the city hasn’t had discussions with the developer
said the city will be interested in how the development’s design will minimize impacts on traffic
The city will also look at other elements like parking
The development will likely require a zoning change
“There’s no opportunity to back-door anything.”
Kirven said County Square is more than an extension of downtown
“It’s a test bed to demonstrate how the future looks in an urban environment,” he said
“It’s a clean slate where we can design and create a smart urban environment for the future
Acceptable Copy Guidelines for the CJ Guaranteed Service
Before issuing a press release over the CJ Guaranteed service you will have to confirm that you have the right to do so and that you have read and understood the CJ Guaranteed terms and conditions
If you have any doubt on either of these points
Press releases that do not conform with the requirements set out below may not be distributed
Statements within a press release that include first person pronouns (I
we) require attribution and should appear in quotes
If you wish to send a press release that makes stock tips or recommendations you must be either a member of FINRA with a valid CID# or a nationally recognized publisher
Please read the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement very carefully before using the Service
Use of the Service indicates that you accept the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement
If you do not accept the terms and conditions of this Agreement
Community Journals facilities are governed by Federal and State regulations
in any format now known or hereafter developed
video and audio files and urls (collectively
You are responsible for payment of all fees associated with your use of the Service
You are responsible for the content and accuracy of all Content submitted through the Service
Because of the volume of information and copy submitted to Community Journals
Community Journals is not responsible for verifying any facts contained in the Content
You represent and warrant to Community Journals that (i) You have the right and authority to deliver to Community Journals all Content submitted
including for distribution through the Service
(ii) You will comply with all applicable laws
including but not limited to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 and laws relating to “spam”
(iii) You have obtained all required authorizations and consents with respect to any data that you provide concerning individuals and the use and transfer thereof
(iv) You will not submit Content that is obscene
false or misleading or which violates any copyright
right of privacy or publicity or other right of any person
(v) You are using the Service for a valid and legitimate business purpose
(vi) You will comply with all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement
(vii) the Content that You submit will conform to Community Journals CG Guaranteed Copy Acceptability Guidelines and will not
contain information related to threatened litigation
stock advice or recommendations or online gaming websites
and (viii) the Content will not contain any viruses
computer systems or data run through such computer systems
You agree to shall indemnify and hold harmless Community Journals
and those licensed or otherwise authorized by Community Journals to process
transmit or distribute Content from and against any and all claims
costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) arising out of or relating to any breach of any of the foregoing representations and warranties or otherwise arising out of or relating to the contents or nature of the Content
We reserve the right to reject or edit copy or other information when necessary in our judgment
provided that no material substantive edits will be made
We reserve the right to retract or withdraw your Content for any reason
You grant to Community Journals a royalty-free perpetual license and right to reproduce
archive and create derivative works of the processed Content
Community Journals does not warrant or ensure that the Service will be free from errors
Any errors by Community Journals will be corrected promptly upon discovery
and such obligation to correct shall constitute the sole liability of Community Journals in this regard
including but not limited to any warranties of merchantability or suitability for print or broadcast
The liability of Community Journals and its affiliates and agents to You shall be limited to the refund of the fees paid by You in connection with the item of Content at issue
and in no event will Community Journals or its affiliates or agents be liable for any indirect
exemplary or incidental damages regardless of the form of action
Community Journals shall not be liable for any delay or non-performance arising from any cause beyond its reasonable control
All news releases and other information transmitted by Community Journals must contain a clearly identifiable source
The source indicates the entity or individual that is responsible for the Content and cannot be the name of an agency issuing news on Your behalf
This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York
If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid
the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way
Any dispute arising under or related in any way to this Agreement shall be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of New York
Nearly two decades after the idea for a Cancer Survivors Park grew from a high school senior project to beautify an area outside a local cancer treatment center
Greenville Cancer Survivors Park will hold its grand opening this weekend
A public ribbon cutting will be held at 11 a.m
“The Dedication to a Vision of Hope and Healing” will feature community leaders sharing the story about the creation of the park and plans for the Center for Hope & Healing
a space for community celebrations and survivorship programs
The ceremony will include recognition of the Greenville Health System
and other contributors who made the park possible
“The Garden Party,” will be held from 6 p.m
The fundraising soiree will feature music by Trey Francis
Guests at the party will be able to walk through the park and hear stories about the design and meaning
Tickets are $125 and are available at cancersurvivorspark.org/the-garden-party.php
Proceeds will benefit the Cancer Survivors Park Alliance’s education programs
A free Cancer Survivors Day Celebration will be held at the park from 1 p.m
Activities include walking tours of the park
A survivors recognition ceremony and photo are set for 2:32 p.m
Registration is requested but not required
“We are excited to be celebrating a significant milestone — the transformation of a challenged piece of property into a beautiful park
We still have much to do as we transition from bricks and mortar to a focus on incorporating the creative features
and resources that are the essence of our vision — creating a space for hope and healing,” said Kay Roper
executive director of the Cancer Survivors Park Alliance
As the functions of parks grow more complex
public-private partnerships have increased as a funding source
Greenville’s Unity Park is an example of many of the current trends in building urban parks — a greater reliance on public-private partnerships
the conversion of postindustrial sites into green space
and construction of facilities that accommodate fluctuation in water levels to help water quality and flooding issues
“Parks are no longer simply places for recreation
That’s why public-private partnerships are so important,” said Catherine Nagel
“Really where public-private partnerships shine is that they bring in more resources and skills.”
While Greenville has been known for public-private partnerships for downtown development projects such as the Hyatt
Mayor Knox White said Unity Park is the city’s first example of a true public-private partnership on a park
The city has earmarked $20 million in hospitality tax revenue for the new park over 10 years and wants private partners to contribute another $20 million
Separate from the city’s fundraising efforts is one led by Community Journals’ chairman and co-founder Doug Greenlaw to raise money for a veterans memorial in the park
Greenlaw is a founder of the Upstate charter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart
“Public-private partnerships have become a critical funding tool in the toolbox,” said Kevin O’Hara
vice president of urban and government affairs for the National Recreation and Parks Association
public-private partnerships are good for parks.”
Chicago’s Millennium Park was a result of a public-private partnership
Mayor Richard Daley originally proposed construction of a parking garage with a landscaped greenroof on land that had been parkland
The original plan financing called for $120 million from parking revenue bonds and $30 million from private resources
plans for the park had changed drastically
A cycle center provides heated bicycle parking
There are outdoor art galleries and a promenade
and the Pritzker Pavilion that hosts the Grant Park Musical Festival
Underneath the park is a 4,000 space parking garage
the park was the Midwest’s most popular tourist attraction
There’s a wide range of how park public-private partnerships are structured
“There’s a real range of public-private partnership models to consider,” she said
“The key is to fit the model to your community
Some cities have a strong base of philanthropic organizations
City Park would also mirror the trend in other cities where postindustrial sites are turned into parks and green space
those sites are on waterfronts and riverfronts
areas that some cities turned their backs on and became nasty places to which people didn’t want to go
a waterfront cargo yard was turned into one of New York’s signature parks
The city redirects real estate taxes from residential and commercial developments in the project zone
creating a self-sustaining revenue stream that is far less dependent on concessions and permits for special events than signature parks in other major cities
“Parks are helping to revitalize cities and put them on the map,” Nagel said
“It’s exciting that those projects are not just happening in the largest cities but in medium and small cities as well.”
– The Florida Panthers will try to rebound from their first loss of the playoffs when they host the Tampa Bay Lightning for a rematch at Amerant Bank Arena on Monday
After winning the first two games of the Eastern Conference First Round on the road by a combined score of 8-2
the Panthers suffered a 5-1 loss in Game 3 in Sunrise on Saturday
Still in the driver’s seat with a 2-1 series lead
“Just get back to our own game,” forward Anton Lundell said
We know what the game’s going to look like
Finding the back of the net for the third time in the series
who missed the final 25 games of the regular season with a lower-body injury
stayed hot and opened the scoring for the Panthers in Game 3 with a tap-in goal just 2:43 into the first period
the next five goals would belong to the Lightning
the underlying numbers should pause any panic
the Panthers led 50-30 in shot attempts and 24-14 in scoring chances
the Panthers also endured a stellar showing from Andrei Vasilevskiy
who made 14 high-danger saves for Tampa Bay
With Aaron Ekblad returning from his 20-game suspension
Game 3 also marked the first time the Panthers had what they would essentially consider their full lineup for the first time
it’s a loaded group that should getting more comfortable each game
“We’ve kind of been building something all year,” forward Carter Verhaeghe said
“It’s good to get our whole group together
Having Ekky back is a huge boost for our group
I think we’re just playing it game by game
Notching at least one point in all three games of the series thus far for the Panthers
Sam Bennett is tied with Tkachuk for the team’s scoring lead with four points
Sam Reinhart and Aleksander Barkov have all tallied three points
the Panthers have been really clicking on both sides
In addition to converting on 30% of their power plays
they’ve gone 12-for-13 (92.3%) on the penalty kill
Greer will join the fourth line in place of rookie forward Mackie Samoskevich
Greer posted a career-high 17 points (six goals
17 assists) in 81 games during the regular season
he also racked up a career-high 130 penalty minutes
“Happy to join the group and be a part of it
As far as my part in injecting something into the series
it’s just how I played during the regular season – up and down
it’s been the duo of Jake Guentzel and Nikita Kucherov doing the damage
Tied for first on the team with four points each in the series
the two elite forwards each recorded three points in Game 3
Missing Game 3 after being suspended for a dangerous hit on Barkov in Game 2
Brandon Hagel will return to the lineup for the Lightning in Game 4
Appearing in all 82 games during the regular season
Hagel ranked fifth in the NHL with 32 even-strength goals in 2024-25
the Panthers believe a bounceback is in store for Game 4
“It’s finding a balance to stay even keel,” Verhaeghe said of managing the ebbs and flows of a series
“It’s never as bad as it seems and it’s never as good as it seems
I’m expecting to see that stuff.” – Anton Lundell on A.J
There’s a lot of nerves inside the building
“I'm a big fan of that young man." – Paul Maurice on Mackie Samoskevich
- Aleksander Barkov has a team-high three assists in Round 1
- Nate Schmidt leads Florida’s defensemen with three goals in Round 1
- Eetu Luostarinen led the Panthers with nine hits in Game 3
- Seth Jones has blocked a team-high seven shots in Round 1
the Panthers are 15-0-0 when leading after the first period in the playoffs
Carter Verhaeghe – Aleksander Barkov – Sam Reinhart
Evan Rodrigues – Sam Bennett – Matthew Tkachuk
Eetu Luostarinen – Anton Lundell – Brad Marchand
- April 25: F Jesse Puljujarvi assigned to Charlotte (AHL)
Radio: 790 WAXY (Dade/Broward); 92.1 WZZR-FM (Palm Beach); 100.3 WCTH (Florida Keys); Panthers App; SiriusXM Channel 91 / App & Streaming 931
Tickets: Click Here
There are no statistics available for this player
Thanks for visiting
The use of software that blocks ads hinders our ability to serve you the content you came here to enjoy
We ask that you consider turning off your ad blocker so we can deliver you the best experience possible while you are here
Please select what you would like included for printing:
Copy the text below and then paste that into your favorite email application
he was baptized at Faith Baptist Church by Rev
he sang in the church choir and competed in multiple sports
He graduated from the SUNY University at Albany
and had three children who he loved endlessly
He worked as a plumber for the State of New York for 30 years
where he rose to the position of supervisor
He also ran a successful business as a private contractor
He always had the right thing for you and he never let you leave empty handed
Stanley gave of himself in abundance as well
He gave his home to all who sought comfort
He gave his joy to anyone who needed laughter
He is also survived by his four sisters Betsy Watson
He was predeceased by his mother Katherleen Greer
and his brothers Bernard Greer and DeAngelo Greer
Friends may join the family Tuesday March 11th
calling hours from 4-6:30pm followed by a short service at New Comer Cremations and Funeral Home on 343 New Karner Road
Enter your phone number above to have directions sent via text
Click to watch
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply
Service map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
she was the daughter of the late Terry and Betty Kleckner
she is preceded in death by her sister Carol Fritch
Bonnie lived an incredible life of selfless service that impacted thousands of people throughout her community
at the age of 25 from the University of Oklahoma
Bonnie worked as a Professor of Special Education at the University of Memphis for over 30 years
She advocated for special needs students through her college classes
preparing thousands of special education teachers over the course of her career
Bonnie continued her service by volunteering as a “baby hugger” at Le Bonheur Children’s Medical Center in Memphis
she would spend several hours hugging babies in the NICU
giving parents respite from the stress of their child’s medical care while comforting babies with significant medical challenges
Her work was so notable that she was featured on the front page of the Sunday edition of the Memphis Commercial Appeal
which detailed the commitment and love she showed to hundreds of infants for over a decade
Bonnie was also a cherished wife and mother
When she wasn’t donating her time to others
visiting over 42 countries with her husband John
Some of Bonnie’s happiest moments were spent with her children and grandchildren
especially when they gathered every year in Perdido Key
Bonnie and John relocated to Athens to be closer to family
A memorial service will be held at Presbyterian Village
the family asks donations to be made to Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital in Memphis
Trade Representative Jamieson Greer shared the transformational and historic trade actions taken by the Trump Administration during its first 100 days and outlined its vision for an America First trade policy during a hearing with the Ways and Means Committee this week
More than 75 nations have already reached out to President Trump
seeking to reset their trade relationship and open discussions on tariff and non-tariff barriers that currently deny access to foreign markets for American goods and services.
Ambassador Greer said he was “losing count” of the number of nations willing to finally treat American exports to their country fairly as a condition for accessing the U.S
President Trump’s 90-day reciprocal tariff pause
creates an opportunity to level the playing field for U.S
businesses and farmers in foreign markets while maintaining the leverage offered by the Administration’s tariff actions.
“Fundamentally Unfair”: European Union Barriers Hurt American Farmers
the lack of market access resulted in a $32 billion agricultural trade deficit last year
with much of that shortfall attributed to the European Union (EU)
Trade Representative’s annual National Trade Estimate Report outlines the tariff and non-tariff barriers that American farmers face
The 2025 report indicates that the EU remains one of the worst offenders
erecting non-tariff barriers intentionally designed to impede American agricultural exports
American farmers and ranchers have nearly no access to the EU’s 450 million consumers
The Trump Administration is committed to tearing down tariff and non-tariff barriers that American agriculture faces around the world in order to restore the agricultural trade surplus
as was the case in President Trump’s first term.
Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08): “I have shared my opinion about the European Union and how disappointed I am of how they’ve taken advantage of U.S
I heard them say that they’re willing to lower their tariffs on industrial goods
They have to address their non-tariff barriers when it comes to agricultural goods
The country of Honduras purchases more pork than the entire European Union
There are 450 million people in the European Union
They purchased more chicken from us than the entire European Union
The European Union has a GDP 200 times that of Angola
This administration will continue to fight for the American farmer
that Missouri farmer who’s been screwed for such a long time by our friends
I want to thank you for continuing with it
Do you agree that there’s a serious trade problem when it comes to agriculture in the European Union?”
It has been for decades. I’ve been very clear with them that any kind of agreement or negotiation or anything
it has to have an ag component for all the reasons you described.”
Trump Trade Policies Brought Foreign Nations to Negotiating Table
More than 75 nations have reached out to the Trump Administration to discuss removing market barriers for U.S
The President’s 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs will provide additional time to rebalance U.S
trading relationships toward fairness for American workers and businesses
Ambassador Greer announced that he had already met with trade representatives from Mexico
and South Korea the day before to discuss fairer arrangements for U.S
Rep
Adrian Smith (NE-03): “How is USTR responding to the influx of requests and prioritizing negotiations?”
Trade Representative: “The other countries know what the trade barriers are that we’re talking about and we’re moving very quickly. We’re meeting every day with several trade ministers from other countries. The crack staff at USTR is working very hard as well to put together what would make sense in terms of near-term agreements with respect to reciprocal trade.”
Trump Trade Agenda Will Protect American Technological Leadership
The Biden Administration retreated from America’s leadership role in protecting digital trade and innovation on the global stage
The previous administration abandoned core bipartisan digital trade rules at the World Trade Organization
creating an opening for foreign competitors such as China and the EU
Ambassador Greer committed to protecting America’s digital innovators and competitive edge.
Rep
Darin LaHood (IL-16): “I believe we have a tremendous opportunity in digital trade and the United States must lead in setting global rules and standards
We can’t allow non-market adversaries like China
to set these standards and further manipulate the digital trade agenda
and we’ve seen the consequences of discriminatory policies hurting U.S
working with our like-minded partners and allies to build on the progress made during President Trump’s first administration
including the digital agreement with Japan and the robust standards set in the digital chapter of USMCA
kind of the gold standard for future trade agreements
What can you say about how you view the expanding U.S
leadership in digital trade moving forward in this administration?”
Trade Representative: “I think it’s a huge comparative advantage that we have. Our digital commerce companies and digital trade companies are the most competitive in the world
and they’re competing with ones from China
we have to win. If I have other countries discriminating against our champions
I know we’re having a national conversation politically on how to regulate digital tech
but in no case can we allow discrimination to undermine our competitive advantage here.”
Tariff Goal: “American Businesses Are Much More Competitive When They Have Open Markets Overseas”
President Trump’s tariff actions represent a meaningful change in the nation’s trade policy
Foreign competitors benefit from their protectionist tariffs
and state subsidies that distort foreign markets against American producers
the recent global and reciprocal tariffs incentivize foreign nations to offer fairer treatment to American businesses in those markets
fostering a “virtuous cycle” of investment and jobs to satisfy foreign demand for U.S
which in turn generates further investment and jobs in the United States.
Rep
Lloyd Smucker (PA-11): “We appreciate the work that the President did during his previous administration
We appreciate the work that he’s doing and that you’re doing on trade
It’s a refreshing change to what we’ve seen over the past four years
and we trust the President to get this right again
We’re seeing already the impact when you have…countries coming to the table that have for a long time had tariffs in place for our goods
The idea of reciprocal trade is a great one
I can tell you the American people in my district
and they support the goals of this administration to bring back manufacturing jobs to the country
to bring back that investment in the country
and then to open up markets to our great American businesses
many of those business owners who love what the President is trying to accomplish are feeling a little consternation
They’re concerned how we’re going to achieve what intent is here
They still believe in what the President is doing…I just wanted to give you an opportunity
to just sort of expand on some of the things that you said previously
but with that sort of audience in mind…What is the end goal?…What will success look like
How will that help every American business?”
Trade Representative: “Ithink we’ll find that American businesses are much more competitive when they have open markets overseas. People talk about the high cost of doing business in America and manufacturing in America and growing in America
but also all the non-tariff barriers that increase costs
and it makes it difficult to be competitive globally
we have foreign producers who receive subsidies
They have countries where economic policies depress domestic demand
They make more stuff than they can consume; they send it here. In the near term
we’re going to see a handful of partners who open their markets more to us
and it makes it much easier and much more competitive economically to have manufacturing here
and export them to the rest of the world…We have to reshore manufacturing
We can have tariff protection as we get rid of the trade deficit
they can potentially have a different arrangement that helps us as we try to have reciprocal trade and get rid of the deficit and get back to being a producing economy.”
The scheduled joint review process for USMCA begins next year
China and other nations have established manufacturing facilities in Canada and Mexico to export their goods into the United States without incurring any duties
trade rules and undercuts American products in the U.S
It will be a critical issue to examine during the review process.
Rep
Carol Miller (WV-01): “Looking to the very near future
the administration is required by statute to undertake the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement review process in 2026…I’m well aware that this agreement is not perfect and we are fortunate to have the review process in place in order to make the necessary improvements
what commitments can you make to us today in regard to the USMCA review
how will you use this opportunity to advance President Trump’s goals of promoting domestic manufacturing and how will you engage with Congress to facilitate this process?”
Trade Representative: “I’ll just note that goods coming from Canada and Mexico right now that comply with the rules of the agreement continue to enter duty free
I met with my Mexican counterpart last night
I have a meeting with my Canadian counterparts
and we expect that we will initiate the public consultation process that’s required by the statute at some point. With the USMCA
it’s important that Canada and Mexico not be used as an export platform for third countries. That’s not what we want
USMCA should be an agreement that promotes manufacturing in America and that we can rely on our partners to the north and south
if needed. It can’t be a situation where countries can just come in
assemble it with parts from there and send it across and get the benefit of an agreement where they’ve taken no obligations. So I want to make sure that it truly is an agreement that helps America first.”
Americans recognized the extent of the country’s dependence on foreign nations
The Biden Administration failed to take meaningful action to reshore the medical supply chain
leaving the nation vulnerable to another global crisis or the unpredictability of the Chinese Communist Party
the Trump Administration is focused on employing our trade tools to ensure a safe and reliable supply of drugs and medical devices for Americans.
Rep
Greg Murphy (NC-03): “One thing that happened in the pandemic…we saw that our supply chain for pharmaceuticals
If China were to shut off all its exports overnight
medical supply chains would be one of the industry’s hardest hit
and we would have American patients literally dying because they could not get medicines or other type of devices
Can you discuss how the Trump administration’s trade [agenda] is helping to secure our health supply chain?”
we have to reshore pharmaceutical production to avoid the very situation you talked about
We can’t wait for the next conflict. We have to do it now
I understand the Commerce Department will be undertaking an investigation of the pharmaceutical supply chain to assess what tools we can use
The President has talked about tariffs that might apply to certain things to incentivize reshoring
I assume that investigation will also have other ideas as well.”
Trump Tariffs Already Keeping Jobs In America
President Trump’s trade agenda promotes investment and job creation in the United States
even more companies announced new investment and jobs into the United States that would have otherwise been sent to a foreign country
Businesses have pledged $7 trillion in new investments in the U.S
Rep
Greg Steube (FL-17): “What evidence have you seen that President Trump’s tariffs are driving jobs back to the United States and helping to rebuild our manufacturing base?”
the auto tariffs that were imposed; we’ve already seen that one company is increasing employment
there was a shift that was going to go down to another country
They kept that shift in America. Everyone knows
you build in America and you use American labor.”
Ambassador Jamieson Greer was confirmed by the U.S
Senate as the 20th United States Trade Representative on February 27
As a key member of President Trump’s cabinet
Ambassador Greer has made it a priority to put America First on trade by combating unfair foreign trade practices
expanding market access for Made in America products
and ensuring the United States has balance and reciprocity in its trading relationships
Ambassador Greer returns to USTR after previously serving as Chief of Staff to Ambassador Robert Lighthizer during President Trump’s first term
he was deeply involved in the Administration’s implementation of tariffs on China and subsequent negotiation of the U.S.-China Phase One Agreement
He also was a critical part of USTR’s efforts to negotiate
Ambassador Greer was a partner at a Washington law firm where his practice focused on international trade and national security issues
from the University of Virginia School of Law and a joint Master in Global Business Law from l’Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po) and l’Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
in International Studies from Brigham Young University
the United States Senate voted to confirm Jamieson Greer as United States Trade Representative in a vote of 56-43
“It is my honor to be confirmed by the Senate to serve as President Trump’s US Trade Representative,” said Ambassador Greer
“President Trump recognizes the role unfair trade practices have played in offshoring American jobs and harming our national security
I will work strategically to address unfair trade practices
and restore America’s ability to become a country of producers
I look forward to building off the many successes from President Trump’s first term to lead USTR in executing a robust trade agenda that puts America First.”
We have the address for the funeral home & the family on file
If you're not happy with your card we'll send a replacement or refund your money
The family of Paula Tate Brown created this Life Tributes page to make it easy to share your memories
Made with love by funeralOne
Log in to comment on videos and join in on the fun
Watch the live stream of Fox News and full episodes
Reduce eye strain and focus on the content that matters
Receive emails when new obituariesare published to our website
Welcome to Meierhoffer Funeral Home & Crematory
When you have experienced the loss of a loved one
you can trust us to guide you through the arrangements necessary to create a meaningful ceremony that celebrates the unique life being honored
Our staff is committed to providing your family with the highest quality care and service in your time of need
and we take pride in our responsibility to lighten your burden as you take the first steps toward healing.
At Meierhoffer Funeral Home & Crematory
we want to relieve you of the stress of funeral planning
Whether you choose a full-service funeral or a budget-friendly direct cremation
Funeral services can include a viewing or open-casket optional service
Cremation services can be affordable and straightforward with a direct cremation without a service
you can arrange cremation with a memorial ceremony
our team can help you without the urgency of time
You can plan ahead instead of forcing your family to make dozens of decisions regarding caskets
when you choose our facility with an on-site crematory and a reception center
your loved ones only have to make one stop
Our Meierhoffer Funeral Home & Crematory team serves St. Joseph, Savannah, Avenue City, Agency, Clarksdale, Faucett
Our permanent memorialization options will help you honor your loved ones in the way they would have wanted
Meet with a member of our team at Meierhoffer Funeral Home & Crematory to tour the facility and get to know our staff. Visit our funeral home in Saint Joseph, MO, to see the beautiful facility and learn more about the services. You can call to ask any questions as well: (816) 232-3366
Click here to go to the Obituary page or Click the Obituary button above
When finances are a concern we guarantee that we will take care of your family
Permanent memorialization allows the healing process to begin
We offer a full range of gifts to help comfort and support those who need it the most delivered direct from your local florist
Our extensive collection of cremation urns and jewelry keepsakes is available on our online Urn Store
For engraved or personalized options please contact one of our funeral directors for assistance
Copyright © 2016 Meierhoffer Funeral Home & Crematory | Website Design by Frazer Consultants & TA
Your browser may not work with certain site. Upgrade now.
a devoted father and beloved figure in the food service industry
he was the son of Barbara Jeanette (née Coates) Greer and the late Charles Roller Greer
where he attended Lower Merion Township schools and graduated from Harriton High School
He had a passion for music – and in particular all things Barry Manilow – learning to play the piano and later working as a DJ upon the completion of his bachelor’s from West Chester University in 1984
He would go on to serve as a customer service representative for nearly two decades at QVC; participated in the gig economy as an Uber driver; and
most recently became a member of the McDonald’s “McFamily” as a dedicated employee loved by his coworkers for his humility
Those fortunate enough to be in his presence knew him not only as a professional but as a friend
Peter is survived by his loving sons
and dear brothers David Greer and Thomas Greer
as well as many caring friends and acquaintances.
Peter’s presence will be profoundly missed
but his spirit will continue to live on in the hearts of those he touched
let us celebrate the beautiful life he lived and the positive impact he had on the world around him
Services and interment for Peter will be held privately
Contributions in Peter’s memory would be appreciated to Autism Speaks, https://www.autismspeaks.org/.
US President Donald Trump’s administration expects to conclude initial tariff deals with some US trading partners within weeks
but negotiations with India are not “finish-line close” and no official talks with China are under way
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Wednesday
Greer told Fox News that the Trump administration is focused on “targeted” deals aimed at increased market access for US exports
reducing tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers
but I will say we’re talking about a matter of weeks and not months
Asked whether a deal with India was imminent
but I have a standing call with India’s trade minister.”
He also cited frequent US-India meetings in recent days
Greer said he would meet with representatives from Japan
Guyana and Saudi Arabia yesterday and the Philippines today
and is working closely with South Korea and the UK
there were no official talks with China taking place
although he held a call with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) announcing the steep “reciprocal” tariffs on April 2
The Trump administration wants fair trade with China
“Instead of having an economy that’s financed by the government
and it means we have to deal with foreign trade practices that are harmful
Trump reiterated there was a “very good chance we’re going to make a deal” with China
“But we’re going to make it on our terms and it’s got to be fair,” Trump told a NewsNation “town hall.”
a social media account affiliated with Chinese state media said yesterday that the US has approached China seeking talks over Trump’s 145 percent tariffs
“The US has proactively reached out to China through multiple channels
hoping to hold discussions on the tariff issue,” Yuyuan Tantian (玉淵譚天) said in a post published on its official Weibo social media account
Yuyuan Tantian is not among China’s most authoritative state media outlets
which is owned by the newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party
has often been first to report China’s next steps in trade disagreements over the past few years
In loving memory of the Beloved Dianne Greer Crow
and enjoyed her clothes and keeping her home tidy.
for many years before relocating to Cowpens
Crow graduated from Rock Hill High School and Cecil’s Business College
Crow is survived by her loving husband James “Kenneth” Crow
two nieces who will honor her memory and carry on her legacy.
“I give everything to God and am forever thankful for my years with my loving wife
UPDATE: Trump backs down on most tariffs for 90 days but raises rate on Chinese imports to 125%
WASHINGTON (AP) — Manufacturers struggling to make long-term plans
Farmers facing retaliation from Chinese buyers
Republican senators are confronting the Trump administration with those worries and many more as they fret about the economic impact of the president’s sweeping tariff strategy that went into effect Wednesday
In a Senate hearing and interviews with reporters this week
Republican skepticism of President Donald Trump’s policies ran unusually high
While GOP lawmakers made sure to direct their concern at Trump’s aides and advisers — particularly U.S
who appeared before the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday — it still amounted to a rare Republican break from a president they have otherwise championed
WATCH: ‘This is amateur hour.’ Rep. Horsford blasts U.S. trade rep after Trump tariff pause
Lawmakers had reason to worry: the stock market has been in a volatile tumble for days and economists are warning that the plans could lead to a recession
“Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?” Republican Sen
Thom Tillis told Greer as he pressed for an answer on which Trump aide to hold accountable if there is an economic downturn
Tillis’ frustration was aimed at the across-the-board tariff strategy that could potentially hamstring U.S
manufacturers who are currently dependent on materials like aluminum and steel from China
has attracted thousands of foreign firms looking to invest in the state’s manufacturing industries
Republicans engaged in a delicate two-step of criticizing the rollout of the tariffs then shifting to praise for the president’s economic vision
Tillis in a Senate floor speech said that the “president is right in challenging other nations who have for decades abused their relationship with the United States,” yet went on to question who in the White House was thinking through the long-term economic effects of the sweeping tariffs
Tillis even allowed that Trump’s trade strategy could still turn out to be effective
but said there is a short window to show that it is worth the higher prices and layoffs that will burden workers
Greer emphasized to the committee that the U.S
was engaged in negotiations with other countries but that “the trade deficit has been decades in the making
and it’s not going to be solved overnight.”
have emphasized that Trump needs time to implement his strategy
They’ve mostly rejected the idea of putting a check on Trump’s tariff power
but it is clear that anxiety is growing among rank-and-file Republicans about what’s ahead
said there is a company in his state that had spent “millions of dollars” moving its parts production from China to Vietnam
But now that Vietnam is facing steep tariffs
the business is unable to move forward with negotiating prices with retailers
Lankford pressed Greer for a timeline for negotiations
“We don’t have any particular timeline
The outcome is more important than setting something artificially for us.”
Trade agreements between countries typically take months or even years to work out and often require the parties to navigate through a host of legal
Republicans said they were encouraged by the indications that Trump is entering into negotiations with other nations
said at the committee hearing that he was “very encouraged” by news of trade negotiations and attributed a momentary upward tick in the stock market to “hope that these tariffs are a means and not solely an end.”
I’m worried about the inflationary effect
I’m worried if there is a trade war that we’re going to have markets shutting down for American farmers
Other GOP lawmakers contended that the pain was worth bearing
a member of the conservative Freedom Caucus
but it’s going to be,” he said
“The president will make the right call
traditional Republicans were looking for ways to push back on Trump’s tariff plan
has introduced a bipartisan bill to give Congress the power to review and approve of new tariffs
and Republican members in the House were also working to gain support for a similar bill
Such legislation would allow Congress to claw back some of its constitutional power over tariff policy
which has been almost completely handed over to the president in recent decades through legislation
But the White House has already indicated that Trump would veto the bill
and both Senate Majority Leader John Thune
have said they are not interested in bringing it up for a vote
said on social media that the bill was a bad idea because “Congress moves at the pace of a tortoise running a race.”
“The reason why Congress gave this authority to the president to begin with is because the ability to pivot,” he added
But the president’s unclear messaging has also left lawmakers only guessing as they try to decipher which advisers and aides hold sway in the White House
said that as he’s received calls from the business community in his state
he’s had no answers for them besides telling them the prospects for the economy are uncertain
The communication from the president’s aides has often been conflicting
Kennedy said even as he voiced support for Trump’s long-term goals
“I don’t think there’s any way to double or triple your tariffs on the world when you’re the wealthiest country in all of human history without being somewhat shambolic.”
© 1996 - 2025 NewsHour Productions LLC
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization
Subscribe to Here's the Deal with Lisa Desjardins
She was a member of Boiling Springs Baptist Church and had retired from Beaumont Mills
After deciding that retirement was not for her
with her last job being Spartanburg Regional Hospital Gift Shop.
and Logan Solesbee (JD); two great grandchildren
Thank you to all of her friends and family that have kept in touch with cards
Private services will be held at a later date
donations may be sent to the following:
https://www.stjude.org/donate
Shriners Hospital – Greenville
https://donate.lovetotherescue.org/give/119312/#!/donation/checkout
Men's Basketball Inks Hudson Greer11/13/2024 12:15:00 PM | Men's Basketball
former chief of Orthopaedic Surgery at Penn State College of Medicine and one of the last remaining foundational leaders of the medical institution
Greer was recruited to the College of Medicine in 1971 by Dr
Waldhausen as the first chief of the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
serving in this role until his retirement in 1992
the residency program gained national recognition
and he also helped shape the education mission as associate dean of medical education at the College of Medicine from 1987 to 1992
serving as president of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery and editor-in-chief of The American Journal of Orthopedics
faculty and the Waldhausen family established the Robert B
MD Professorship in Orthopaedic Surgery in 2015
he was further recognized with the Cheston M
He was an Emeritus Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
Greer will be remembered for his myriad accomplishments across the spectrum of academic orthopaedics,” said Dr
an orthopaedic surgeon at Penn State Health Milton S
interim vice dean for educational affairs at the College of Medicine and a former chair of the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation
“As the founding chief of Orthopaedic Surgery at Penn State College of Medicine
he advanced the profession and our college in countless ways
The residents who were fortunate to learn from him continued to express their admiration for him throughout their careers
The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation was built on his legacy and leadership.”
For those who wish to honor Greer’s legacy, contributions may be made to support Orthopaedic Resident Education at Penn State through the Orthopaedic Global Mission Endowment. More details can be found here
If you're having trouble accessing this content, or would like it in another format, please email Penn State Health Marketing & Communications
© 2025 Penn State College of Medicine
Have questions, or suggestions for missing content? Email us at comweb@pennstatehealth.psu.edu
Irene Mae Brown Greer passed away in her home peacefully on February 6
Missouri on November 16,1939 to Emily Jane and Elmont W
Irene always dreamed of having a big family
She met and married the love of her life Blaine on October 15,1957 lasting 46 years until his passing
She raised six children in a home filled with warmth
Her greatest joy was being a mother and grandmother
She embraced every moment with an open heart and an unforgettable
She also enjoyed having family over for roast dinner on Sundays
whether it was a word of encouragement or a sharp-witted joke
she had a way of bringing light into every room she entered
and all those whose lives she impacted with her love and generosity
as well as 12 grandchildren and 19 great-grandchildren
Jeff Greer and Becky (Trent) DeVries; and her parents
The family would like to thank all the caretakers and hospice workers for all their kindness and support
Friends may visit with family on Thursday from 6 to 8 p.m
Lindquist’s Washington Heights Memorial Park,
ORDER VIDEOS
Lindquist's Washington Heights Memorial Park
Thanks for visiting
Photo by: Brock BusickGreer Named to AAC Weekly Honor Roll Apr 14
On3 is a registered trademark of On3 Media
It is a battle royale on this week’s GeriPal podcast
well known for heavy hits of bedside assessments
and a knockout punch of interdisciplinary collaboration
we have in-person palliative care consults
Travel time can leave this champ vulnerable to fatigue and no-shows
able to reach patients across vast distances when delivering palliative care
we have telehealth delivered palliative care
lack of physical presence may make this contender struggle to land the emotional support punch that is at the very heart of palliative care
Will in-person palliative care use its experience and bedside manner to overwhelm telehealth palliative care
or will telehealth deliver the knockout blow of efficiency and accessibility
Find out on this week’s podcast where we invite Joseph Greer, Simone Rinaldi, and Vicki Jackson to talk about their recent JAMA article on “Telehealth vs In-Person Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer – A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial.”
here are some of the resources we talked about during the podcast:
Lastly, don’t forget about attending some of the sessions Vicki mentioned at the end of the podcast during the HPNA/AAHPM annual meeting in Denver, as well as the GeriPal #HPMParty Pub Crawl!
** This podcast is not CME eligible. To learn more about CME for other GeriPal episodes, click here
Eric 00:00
Alex 00:45
Eric 00:46
today is a battle royale on the GeriPal Podcast
known for heavy hits of bedside assessments
and a knockout punch of interprofessional collaboration
Alex 01:06
Eric 01:08
we have the young upstart telehealth delivered palliative care
We have telehealth delivered palliative care
Alex 01:32
who’s a psychologist and associate professor of psychology at MGH and Harvard Medical School
Joe 01:42
Alex 01:43
who’s a palliative care nurse practitioner and director of nursing for the MGH Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric medicine
Simone 01:54
Alex 01:56
chief of the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine at MGH
and co director of the Harvard Medical School center for Palliative Care
Vicki 02:10
Alex 02:11
who’s an outpatient palliative care doc
and professor at UCSF in the Division of Geriatrics
Lynn 02:20
Eric 02:21
and Vicki were all authors of a great telehealth versus in-person palliative care study published in JAMA New England journal
Before we get into the results of those studies and what they did
Joe 02:43
We thought Hello by Adele would be thematic for our conversation today
Eric 02:48
is it just because it sounds like a telephone call
Joe 02:54
There’s layers of meaning in those lyrics
Eric 02:58
Alex 03:05
Alex 04:44
Lynn 04:46
Alex 04:48
Have you seen the Saturday Night Live where the family’s arguing and one is
but then somebody plays Adele and everybody hello
Eric 05:07
One day Zoom will get it so we can all sing together
Alex 05:11
Eric 05:11
let’s talk about who is victorious in person
but you published a great JAMA paper on this big study
why did you and your colleagues decide to do this study
Joe 05:46
when we were originally conceiving of the study
before the pandemic and before pretty much most of us were doing anything related to Zoom or telehealth via video visits
Eric 06:01
Joe 06:04
Eric 06:07
Alex 06:09
Joe 06:10
it was like the Flintstones version of video visits
Vicki and other leaders in palliative care and Dr
we’ve been testing the early integration of palliative care in clinic through several studies
actually a number of groups across the world
were running these types of trials and all demonstrating really decent efficacy for improving quality of life for patients with advanced cancer and in particular for patients with advanced lung cancer
And so we were celebrating the great model that this was and how it was improving patient and caregiver experience and hoping that that would translate into practice
Change got adopted by ASCO’s Quality Initiatives and guidelines and others like the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and other societies had recommended this care model as standard of care for this population
given workforce shortages and just the challenges and the resources necessary to be able to provide early integrated palliative care from the time of diagnosis of advanced cancer
at least not in our current state with our available infrastructure and resources
We were moving from this thought of we know it works
but how do we get it out there in a way that people can actually do it
The scalability question is really what was driving us to think creatively about improving access and efficiency and care in delivering this model of care
And so that’s how we landed on telehealth as one potential option
but one option to really improve that scalability and improve that access
so we were just very pleased and excited that ultimately some funding organization agreed with us and gave us about $10 million 20 to run this study across different sites
And here we are seven years later with a JAMA publication
Eric 08:20
But before we actually talk about what you did
I think we asked you this question the last time too
How important is it that we dissect all of these different ways we can deliver palliative care
telehealth versus in person physician NP versus physician social worker
How important is it that we really drill down into how we’re delivering that palliative care syringe
Vicki 08:50
I think one thing that was humbling in a study
the follow up study we did to the New England Journal study
which was expanding a monthly in person model into a GI population
we saw differences in how that intervention impacted the Patient’s experience and their quality of life
We replicated the findings in the lung cancer population and it wasn’t until 24 weeks with the GI cancer population
So I think what I love about our field is we are really early on in understanding what is it that really makes a big difference
What do different patient populations need
But how do we think about the right outcomes and the right intervention frequency and structure in heart failure
I think it’s really important that we understand and we can maybe at some point talk about
One of the things that is most interesting to me is what we have really understood
is really mediating what we’re seeing in all these patient reported outcomes
I think we have a whole host of different models
We could think about different ways that different clinicians who might be able to provide different parts of the model and allow this work that we’re doing that we know now is really effective and helps patients to be more scalable
Eric 10:25
Joe 10:32
Essentially we’re testing the early integrated palliative care model
which is monthly visits with a specialty trained palliative care physician or advanced practice provider for patients who are diagnosed with advanced non small cell lung cancer
So they had to be within three months of diagnosis and they were going to be randomly assigned to either the traditional model that we’ve been testing
So delivering those month visits in clinic
often in tandem with their other oncology appointments
And I give a huge shout out to all the clinicians who are on this study
the 100 plus clinicians who like bend over backwards to work with their schedules and see those patients in clinic
Eric 11:13
And you tried to see them in the same day that they were seeing oncology
Joe 11:17
And that’s why this study was successful
because of their tremendous flexibility and generosity
So comparing that to the same dose in frequency and focus of conversations
in terms of what is key and critical to the early palliative care intervention
those monthly video visits versus in person care
The only thing we were Varying was just whether it was in clinic or delivered over video
And the sample size was roughly 1,250 patients
So a pretty definitive and robust study to answer that question
Eric 12:22
We just had Jennifer Tamel on a couple months ago and others to talk about stepped palliative care
And she talked a little bit about the difference between non inferiority efficacy and superiority trials
And it sounded like big difference was the power and the sample size calculation
Why did you pick an equivalence study instead of a non inferiority study versus superiority
Joe 12:58
So I would say in terms of the question around superiority
we didn’t have any particular data where we thought this particular modality
either video or in person care would be superior
Alex 13:12
Joe 13:13
We didn’t think that there was something unique to the modality delivery in which palliative care was providing that care
And having these types of conversations that are so meaningful
especially from the onset of an advanced diagnosis like that
that we thought theoretically or empirically one would be better than the other
Really this was just an open question for us
Like when we pit these two modalities against each other
are they able to perform at a decent similar level
Was the question the stats question and the methods question you’re asking is like really
should this been a non inferiority versus an equivalent study
And in retrospect it probably would have made sense to have this been a non inferiority study
Meaning that video visits were just as good as in person visits is kind of really the question
Whereas an equivalence is saying are these two modalities really within the same band of improvement
not one being less or one being higher than the other
And you could make the argument like if one beats out the other one
especially if video visits did better than in person visits
we didn’t have a hypothesis that that would be the case
that would obviously be picked up from a non inferiority study just as good as or even better
But we were really kind of hemming ourselves in saying that they had to be within a certain range to be equivalent
And that’s not really the question actually
We’re really just more curious if they were comparable
Eric 14:43
but that did mean you had a big sample size
Joe 14:47
Vicki 14:50
Joe 14:53
Eric 14:53
Lynn 14:54
Vicki 14:56
Every site had different things that were struggles
Simone 15:15
And I think that that was the power of having
We had monthly meetings with all the centers across the country to be able to talk about
where things were going well and where the challenges were
was learning from each other about strategies for where things weren’t going well
because we all got stuck in being able to move forward with recruitment and kind of operational and implementational issues
Eric 15:42
Did you make sure everybody was delivering the same type of palliative care intervention
or did everybody just do what they do in their palliative care clinics and just saw what happened
Lynn 15:55
Vicki 15:56
So part of what we did was have all the sites trained up front
And I would say we weren’t doing training on symptom management
seeing patients so upstream that they didn’t have symptoms
We sort of had this language that we talked about with the sites of
Because there’s actually work to be done there
But so then it was really helping them think through a framing for the work
And part of the way we framed it was that because we’ve known from our previous studies that how patients cope when they see palliative care early is really driving a lot of these outcomes
We really spent a lot of time helping the clinicians see that a patient’s illness
understanding and prognostic awareness was just as important as their pain scale
And that they actually had to see that as a clinical domain that they addressed in each visit and subsequently over time
that when we’re talking about these things
it might seem like we’re just being really nice
This is actually a skill and helping the Clinicians think about it as a skill was really important
And so we reinforced that over time in yearly trainings
That got reinforced in these monthly meetings where
what was great about these monthly meetings with each of these sites is they would bring not only their concerns about recruitment or something related to the study
The patient refuses to ever talk about the fact that this illness could take their life
It actually allowed for really rich discussion of if you get to care for someone over the course of one or two years
how do we titrate our intervention to really help them live Well
Lynn 18:25
Vicki 18:31
Lynn 18:32
Eric 18:34
Lynn 18:36
Eric 18:37
Why did the telehealth get an in person initial visit
Was it for opioids so you can prescribe them
Joe 18:44
this is before the pandemic and people had a lot of hesitation about video visits and
and could you establish a relationship over video from
And so when we were conceiving of the study
we had various stakeholders and constituents that were serving in an advisory capacity for us and both our patient and caregiver collaborators and our clinician collaborators all unison agreement to say you need an in person visit to establish rapport before transitioning to video visits
And I’m not sure we would say that today
but at the time that was super meaningful and
and so we modified the protocol based on those recommendations
Eric 19:29
let’s say imagine the study didn’t happen
Do you feel like you would need to have that in person first visit in the television
Simone 19:41
I think that that’s part of the wonderful outcome of this study
I think we were very concerned about it at the start of the study and everybody was on the same page that we would have an in person visit because we were so concerned about the ability to establish rapport
we’ve been able to see that threat of coping
I think we’ve also been able to see the thread of rapport building and that the essential piece of rapport building and relationship as something that allows for everything that comes after
And so at the start of the study we were so concerned about can we really establish the same kinds of rapport and relationship with patients using this modality
Eric 20:31
before we get into the answer I got another question
I want to just highlight that I loved the supplement
it actually breaks down based on initial visit follow up visits
And at the end like end of life care was not talked about at every starting of every palliative care clinic is that may be discussed but the heart of the initial visit it sounded like was relationship and rapport building
And then there was a lot of stuff on coping and symptom management
I think for me it just highlights a lot of kind of what we do
But I also thought this was mainly delivered right by
Joe 21:16
Eric 21:18
But what about the social workers and the chaplains
Vicki 21:23
so like our site at mgh we have cancer center social workers who are very engaged
find themselves very well versed in palliative care and really want to be the primary people supporting patients in the thoracic clinic
We would make referrals to psycho oncology
I would make referrals to Joe as well as part of the team
But there were some sites where social work would be really in a more embedded a palliative care social worker more embedded in the model
Joe 22:08
the protocol stipulated that the monthly visits would be administered by either
board certified specialty training palliative care physician or an advanced practice provider
But that did not limit those clinicians from making referrals
And to pick up on your prior question about how did we know what they were doing
I mean another measure of fidelity is that at the end of every encounter
the clinician completed a standardized form indicating this is where you were talking about the supplement
Eric 22:47
Joe 22:49
Especially the hours I slaved over that supplement
But when you look at those actual graphs of the topics being discussed and it’s actually not Just the initial visits
Over the course of all the visits that we had
5,000 plus clinician forms that were filled out
these conversations are remarkably similar regardless the frequency and the topics were remarkably similar regardless of the modality
But we do have the information about referrals to other ancillary providers as part of that multidisciplinary team
It’s just what was required per protocol versus kind of like what is patient specific
Eric 23:47
yourself as a physician for social work needs and then making a PRN referral versus having a social worker integrated near your clinic where they’re seeing the patients doing their assessments
Do you feel like that that’s true for sure
Lynn 24:07
I think we try to do visits together with a social worker in our first assessment
the social worker is usually able to do more integrated follow up over time
even if we don’t go on to see people together over time
I think what’s coming home to me is how every single place has its own sort of model
And that kind of speaks to the studies to look at
How do we disseminate this scarce resource
Because nobody has a perfect full team to implement
Vicki 24:48
Lynn 24:49
Vicki 24:51
the other thing that I love is that our previous studies were R1 site
This is a palliative care is effective in improving quality of life for patients
Because even though the models are different and maybe there’s an embedded social worker or maybe the social worker sees patients at different times and the structure isn’t exactly the same
what is essentially in our common syringe works
Eric 25:31
I’m going to play devil’s advocate
I’m going to pull back to what I remember from the stepped palliative care trial
And Alex asked the question there’s no usual care group here
The usual palliative care would be just as needed
Should there have been a third PRN group or third control or usual care group
Vicki 26:02
Eric 26:03
Weren’t you gonna debate this with Vicki in Montreal
Alex 26:07
but I was waiting for the results first so that we could debate
Lynn 26:10
Alex 26:11
Eric 26:13
Vicki 26:13
Speaker 8 26:14
Eric 26:15
But mostly you may not get consults on a lot of these people
Alex 26:24
I guess I’ll weigh in now since you’ve called me out on this
If you look at the population who was studied in this study and the popula
let me just reflect on what you’ve been saying
And it sounds like they got so much out of this
And that part of the intervention that maybe goes unrecognized in the article
the way in which it built community and the way in which you helped each other and helped clinicians and really like
So that is a really interesting model for how to improve and do palliative care nationally as part of a study or maybe outside of a study
The point I think we’re getting to here is that palliative care has changed a lot since that original study in New England Journal that you’re all part of that
If you look back at that population then and the treatments they received
I was doing a visiting professor thing recently in Cleveland
now we’re not called the palliative care team
what’s happening in outpatient palliative care
Can we really say have to have the goalposts moved
are we the reason that the quality of life is getting better or is it something else
I’m talking about palliative care because I firmly have drunk the Kool Aid
Joe 28:17
Clearly I have two thoughts about that and I’m not going to
one thing that we were appreciative of seeing is that in both arms
the improvement in quality of life did mirror what we saw in our early palliative care studies prior
And so it was a clinically meaningful improvement on the functional assessment of cancer therapy lung
It’s the same measure we used in the New England journal article
cancer therapies have been changing dramatically since that original paper came out
And so how do we think about that attribution
In preparation for the plenary that we gave on this study at the annual meeting for ASCO last year at the American Society of Clinical Oncology
did a bit of a deep dive into therapeutic trials for lung cancer just to see what they were showing with respect to quality of life improvements
what we are seeing is not a dramatic increase in quality of life per se based on those trials
but buffering a decrease in quality of life relative to the control groups
whereas we are seeing an actual increase in quality of life in this current trial
but in terms of some of the data I was looking at from those different novel therapeutic trials
that’s what I was sort of gleaning is that it’s more of a buffering effect versus a dramatic improvement in quality of life
You could probably make an argument maybe we still need an usual care in these future studies that this next generation of studies we’re doing
It will be a little challenging and hard pressed to get it through an IRB when the standard of care recommendation is early palliative care
So you’d have to make a solid argument to get it through a review board
Eric 30:15
I think we’ve been dancing around the results
Joe 30:28
Eric 30:29
Joe 30:35
There was an equivalent effect on quality of life at 24 weeks
We had to run a bunch of different sensitivity analyses because the rate of attrition was a bit higher than we anticipated
we did have some video visits in the in person arm
So we had to run some sensitivity analyses to control for that
whether it was either equivalence in all these sensitivities or at least non inferiority
So I think we can walk away saying we feel pretty good that these two modalities match up
Alex 31:19
And can you say more about the magnitude of the quality of life improvement and how it was measured
Joe 31:25
a minimal clinically meaningful difference is roughly six points
And so for both the in person group and the video group
the improvement from baseline to 24 weeks was in excess of six points
Eric 31:44
Joe 31:55
Lynn 31:56
was that caregivers were actually less present during visits in the video visits
Eric 32:06
Lynn 32:07
Eric 32:17
Alex 32:19
Lynn 32:21
I think it has to do with the respond that the video visit provides
it’s sort of just the natural course of things that they’ll walk into the room with the patient
Whereas many times I see caregivers kind of running around doing the dishes and stuff in the background
Simone 32:43
I think another thing that I would add to that is that it does give the opportunity
for patients to be able to have meetings with their palliative care clinician privately in a way that is often not possible when they are in person
But also just to have that private space to be with your clinician
And I think that really matters for folks to be able to talk about their experience sometimes without having to worry about the impact on the family member that’s standing next to them
So I think that that is one of the benefits
Lynn 33:21
Of why also the portability of video visits
like just yesterday I saw somebody while they were in their hotel room taking a trip
which is like what we want people to be able to do
Alex 33:33
Can I just say we’re probably all relieved to find that there was equivalence
like because the caregiver is not there as often and
maybe that allows for more conversations that wouldn’t happen otherwise about things like sexual intimacy
please listen to what I’m saying now
So we would expect there to be some differences
although they weren’t necessarily picked up in this study or were they
Joe 34:26
what I find fascinating about this is the fact that caregivers attended fewer visits in the video arm versus the in person arm
you could make the argument that with the caregiver not being present
perhaps there’s a breakdown in communication
People aren’t on the same page about the goals of treatment or how they’re supporting each other in moving through the treatments
or just even caregiver understanding or awareness of everything that’s going on
which is that perhaps it gives the patient and caregiver just more autonomy to decide when to have a joint visit
And that autonomy allows for different types of conversations and frankly
maybe just a more reprieve and less burden on the caregiver
I was reassured by the fact that we did also measure the outcomes from the caregiver perspective
So we did measure their quality of life and we did measure their coping and their distress
despite the fact that their participation was lower in the video visit group
their outcomes were not different across the two groups
Not only were their outcomes not different with respect to their own quality of life and distress
but also their perceptions of the patient’s curability of their cancer or the goal of treatment where you would think that communication would be a major issue
There were no differences between groups there either in terms of their knowledge and understanding
satisfaction with care for the caregivers and for the patients
Vicki 36:06
I do think it’s also interesting what as clinicians we’ve learned that we ended up doing during the study
And the sites would say this for different patient populations
I would need to be intentional when I wanted the spouse to come in
it’s always probably the child from Boston
it’s always the child from California
can you have your daughter from California join
but we would actually plan it ahead versus it being whenever
I think the other piece we found was there were times when
either oncology or palliative care could say
And there would be times that that would happen when I couldn’t get my arms around what was happening because there’d be a caregiver who I’d be like
And we would do an in person visit to get our arms around what that was
or if I was worried that there were issues with technology or other kinds of things
Eric 37:16
how many of the video visit folks were actually being seen in person or the opposite
Vicki 37:26
Eric 37:27
Lynn 37:35
Eric 37:37
Lynn 37:39
Eric 37:42
Lynn 37:47
I couldn’t get there today because there’s a snowstorm
Joe 37:53
Vicki 38:00
Joe 38:03
If you could design a study for which this type of pandemic would be the worst
But the worst threat to the validity of your study
Simone 38:17
Eric 38:19
But how many people switched from one group to the other
Or I guess they didn’t switch groups
Joe 38:26
we halted recruitment during the first few months of the pandemic so that people weren’t being enrolled and randomly assigned to the in person group knowing that they were going to get video visits because there
So among the enrolled people who were in the in person group
we were able to keep their video visits down to less than 6%.6 percentage
And so that level of contamination was not a threat
We were able to do enough per protocol and sensitivity analysis to show that that level of contamination did not threaten the validity of the study and was still confirmatory for equivalence
Eric 39:05
So they’re equivalent as far as outcomes
you don’t have to beg and borrow and steal rooms
those rooms could be managed by oncology or somebody else who needs to see people in person
Should we just give up on in person palliative care consultations in the outpatient setting
Because they are equivalent from an outcomes perspective
but they’re not equivalent from just the sheer amount of time efficiency perspective
I’m going to ask you first your thoughts
Simone 39:51
I was hoping that you were going to ask Joe
But I think two things just off the top I can’t imagine
although I have no evidence to base this on
that the models that we create aren’t going to include both
And that that is also going to be some of this work that we have to do in the future is to try to figure that out
how to kind of figure out not only that by population
But I think in terms of thinking about how to be implementing and delivering palliative care in this changing landscape
particularly in the changing landscape of cancer care
and thinking about the different populations in terms of low or greater symptom burden
in terms of thinking about how we’re using our resources
I think ultimately we will be needing to figure out models that are individualized and that kind of pull these things together
Like maybe we have kind of high touch palliative care in certain situations
we’re using both in person and telemedicine visits in folks perhaps that are not needing quite the kind of heavy touch because perhaps they’re in the beginning of their disease and they are going to need kind of a lighter touch for a period
Eric 41:14
I love that because I think that’s also what Eduardo Barrera said in the editorial that’s attached to it
And he did this wonderful author in the room for JAMA about the editorial
But it really does need some individualizing
Joe 41:30
Eric 41:31
Joe 41:33
I think the good news is we’re going to continue to learn from this
we talked about the community that we established over the last seven years with this study
Now we’re kind of moving into additional analyses to answer some of these important questions
So one of the palliative care investigator clinicians from Dana Farber
he is really interested in doing some interviews with the clinicians to figure out exactly what Simone was just saying
When did the clinicians feel like in the video visit group that they just had to see the person in clinic
Like what were the indicators for that and are there some
is there guidance that we can put out there given just the sheer volume of data and sheer number of clinicians we have in this study that we can contribute to offer those who are now training in the video visit world
And so I think there’s so much more to come in answering this question
but I don’t think there’s ever going to be a scenario where it’s exclusively video visits that just won’t exist
Simone 42:32
I think also that it would be helpful to be looking at to some of the care that gets delivered that is indirect and outside of the clinic visit that helps to stitch these clinic visits together
I think that that is an area and I think that that is often app and or nursing run care and I think that that is an area to think about in terms of how does that contribute to what we’re seeing here and how does that contribute to what is in that palliative care syringe
Vicki 43:02
It’s not even what happens only with the patients
It’s when the oncologists are popping in the office where the NPs are and saying hey can I talk to you about Mr
And it changes the way they think about how they should be thinking about oncology care for that patient
Lynn 43:21
I was just going to bring us back to our battle in the beginning
Alex 43:24
Eric 43:25
Alex 43:27
Lynn 43:29
When we talked in the very beginning about the in person visit that the stakeholders all said we got to do that first
we said clinicians nowadays they probably would be fine with doing away with that
But I really wonder what the patient and family perspective is now
And it may have changed in a different way
So I’m going to go on the side of we need in person presence
I actually do my video visits here from the office
And I think we need an in person presence in the medical center
we need to sort of be here to be at the table
So I’m going to go on the side of in person
Eric 44:14
Lynn 44:18
what’s best for the patient in terms of how I see the patient
But I think having a presence is super important
Eric 44:25
you’re in a huge leadership position
Vicki 44:29
So one thing I think that we have not done as much
and maybe we will in the future in our studies is actually
the palliative care doctor and the nurse practitioner and the patient
And it’s the palliative care clinician and the oncology team relationship
If we’re only at home in our jammies
we’re not there when they knock on the door to say
I’m on the fence about whether I should give this third line of chemotherapy or not
Eric 45:19
I also noticed on page 23 in the supplement that was actually part of it
like the interaction between the palliative care team and the oncologist
Vicki 45:29
Eric 45:38
because we’re coming close to the hour
you mentioned that there was this guide that you created with your co authors
Have you ever thought about publishing it so people really understand what was actually in that syringe that you taught all these 22 sites or you told them that these are the important things to do besides page 23 in the supplement
Joe 46:07
Eric 46:18
Vicki 46:25
Looked at our manuals that we’ve developed for all these studies
and then tried to help clinicians think about what the tasks are that they’re doing with patients over time
Eric 46:44
Vicki 46:46
Alex 46:48
Vicki 46:50
Eric 46:53
It’s actually called What’s in the Syringe
So we will have links to the book in our show notes and we’ll have a bunch of other links to the show notes to all of our listeners
maybe we can get a little bit more of Adele
Alex 47:14
Eric 48:52
Lynn 48:55
Vicki 49:00
Eric 49:01
So this podcast is being published the week before AAHPM and HPNA
Eric 49:10
What else is happening during the HPNA AAHPM meeting
Vicki 49:15
Can I tell you how excited I am about this year’s annual assembly in Denver
The first one on Thursday is actually going to be Krista Tippett and Lucas Johnson from on being
And Friday reach and step are going to be highlighted with our very own Joe Greer and Jennifer Temel and Simone Rinaldi and Laura Hansen from UNC
Toby Campbell from University of Wisconsin is going to be our MC
And we’re going to actually have a patient talking about her experience being in the video arm
So I think that’s going to be awesome
Alex 49:55
Vicki 49:55
it’s going to be the top three scientific abstracts submitted to HPM
Alex 50:01
Vicki 50:02
Eric 50:04
And don’t forget about the GeriPal Pub crawl Thursday night
Alex 50:09
we are going to be doing a podcast with the abstract presenters
Eric 50:21
Great work on the studies that you’re putting out there
Vicki 50:26
Simone 50:28
Eric 50:29
And thank you to all of our listeners for your continued support
“doing their own research.” Self-identified…
I read Farah Stockman’s article in the NYT on why…
We invite the brightest minds in geriatrics, hospice, and palliative care to talk about the topics that you care most about, ranging from recently published research in the field to controversies that keep us up at night. You’ll laugh, learn and maybe sing along. Hosted by Eric Widera and Alex Smith. Learn more
Greer reiterated President Trump's recent comments that he is “happy to engage in negotiations immediately with countries that believe that they can help us reduce our deficit and get rid of non-tariff barriers...” Further
Greer noted that tariff negotiations will happen “country by country.”
Video and excerpts of Grassley’s questions follow
VIDEO
On U.S. Trade with China:
“I support President Trump's agenda to lower tariffs and non-tariff barriers other countries impose on American goods
I support President Trump's agenda to get a better deal from China and other countries for our farmers and manufacturers
“In fact, even back in 2003, I sent a letter to the Chinese Minister of Commerce at that time pointing out China's failure to live up to its World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations
I went further in 2018 when I was on Senator Daines’ CODEL
I told top Chinese leaders I made a mistake supporting China in the WTO.”
On Goals for Tariffs:
with some countries already retaliating [against] agriculture
I have been very vocal in my wait-and-see approach to these tariffs because I believe President Trump and you
are using them to get fairer trade for Americans with many countries
do you plan to turn these tariffs into trade deals to reduce tariffs and non-tariff barriers
if the purpose is to stall on negotiations in order to keep tariffs high for the sole purpose of feeding the U.S
On Support for Farmers:
“We all know agriculture is usually the first place of retaliation
In response to Chinese retaliation to tariffs
the first Trump administration set up the Market Facilitation Program for farmers
which gave direct payments to farmers affected by the tariffs
This helped farmers weather the short-term impact of trade retaliation
farmers still overwhelmingly want to get their money from the marketplace and not from a government check.”
On Restoring Integrity to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS):
instead of relying on payments from the government
I'm going to give a suggestion … The administration could move very quickly to increase RVOs on the Renewable Fuel Standard so that farmers get more robust domestic markets for their crops
And one place to start would be where the Biden administration came up short with RVOs
only three and 1/10th billion over a three-year period of time on biodiesel
to make that 5.3 [billion] as far as you can see into the future
And that would very dramatically increase soybean prices.”
On Congress’ Authority to Regulate Interstate and Foreign Commerce:
“I made very clear throughout my public service that I'm a free and fair trader. The Constitution gives Congress the authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. I believe that Congress delegated too much authority to the president in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and Trade Act of 1974.”
Back to Calendar
Mitchem Fellow in the College of Education
will deliver the Mitchem Lecture on Monday
Greer will speak on “Youth Activism & Possibilities in the Heartland: Lessons From A Milwaukee Community-Based Education Space.”
The lecture is free and open to all; no RSVP is required
While research highlights the significance of Community-Based Education Spaces for youth and their activism
there is limited focus on Milwaukee’s rich history of youth-led social justice education activism
Much of the scholarship on Midwestern CBES centers on cities like Chicago and Detroit
to combat racial discrimination in education
ExaminingMilwaukee provides crucial insights into how CBES can support youth activism
particularly in response to anti-social justice legislation and policy shifts
like the reinstatement of police in Milwaukee Public Schools
this study examines and illustrates the social practices
youth development and knowledge found within a Milwaukee Black-led CBES
Greer is a graduate student at UW–Madison pursuing a Ph.D
in the Department of Educational Policy and Leadership
with a doctoral minor in qualitative research methodology in education
The Mitchem Fellowship is named in honor of Dr
who earned his doctorate from Marquette in 1981 and is an internationally recognized champion of educational opportunity
Mitchem founded Marquette’s Educational OpportunityProgram and served as its director from 1969–86
School of Dentistry Golden Apple Award Celebration
Jean Dole retirement celebration
Focusing K-12 education reform on teaching efforts